Notice2021-27013
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for Canelo Hills Ladies-Tresses
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 14, 2021
Issuing agencies
Interior DepartmentFish and Wildlife Service
Abstract
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the availability of our draft recovery plan for Canelo Hills ladies-tresses (Spiranthes delitescens), an endangered orchid that occurs in desert wetland habitats in southern Arizona. We request review and comment on this draft recovery plan from local, State, and Federal agencies; Tribal governments; nongovernmental organizations; and the public.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 237 (Tuesday, December 14, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71075-71077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27013]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2021-0135; FXES11130200000-212-FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery
Plan for Canelo Hills Ladies-Tresses
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan for Canelo Hills ladies-tresses
(Spiranthes delitescens), an endangered orchid that occurs in desert
wetland habitats in southern Arizona. We request review and comment on
this draft recovery plan from local, State, and Federal agencies;
Tribal governments; nongovernmental organizations; and the public.
DATES: We must receive any comments on or before February 14, 2022.
Comments submitted online at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> (see ADDRESSES)
must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2022.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may obtain a copy of the draft recovery
plan, recovery implementation strategy, and species status assessment
for review at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> in Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2021-
0135.
Submitting Comments: Submit your comments in writing by one of the
following methods:
<bullet> Internet: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Search for and
submit comments on Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2021-0135.
<bullet> U.S. mail: Public Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
FWS-R2-ES-2021-0135, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS:
PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
For additional information about submitting comments, see Request
for Public Comments and Public Availability of Comments under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
[[Page 71076]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Humphrey, Field Supervisor, at
928-556-2157 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#69230c0f0f36211c0419011b0c10290f1e1a470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e547b787841566b736e766c7b675e78696d30797168">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals who are
hearing or speech impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-
877-8339 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), announce the availability of our draft recovery plan for
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses (Spiranthes delitescens), which we listed
as endangered in 1997 (62 FR 665) under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). This orchid species is
restricted to four populations in ci[eacute]negas (desert wetlands) in
Cochise and Santa Cruz Counties in southern Arizona. The draft recovery
plan includes specific goals, objectives, and criteria that may help to
inform our consideration of whether to reclassify the species as
threatened (i.e., ``downlist'') or remove the species from the Federal
List of Endangered and Threatened Plants (i.e., ``delist''). We request
review of and comment on the draft recovery plan from local, State, and
Federal agencies; Tribal governments; nongovernmental organizations;
and the public.
Recovery Planning and Implementation
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires the development of recovery plans
for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote the
conservation of a particular species. Also pursuant to section 4(f) of
the ESA, a recovery plan must, to the maximum extent practicable,
include:
(1) A description of site-specific management actions as may be
necessary to achieve the plan's goals for the conservation and survival
of the species;
(2) Objective, measurable criteria that, when met, would support a
determination under the ESA's section 4(a)(1) that the species should
be delisted; and
(3) Estimates of the time and costs required to carry out those
measures needed to achieve the plan's goal and to achieve intermediate
steps toward that goal.
In 2016 the USFWS revised its approach to recovery planning, and is
now using a process termed recovery planning and implementation (RPI)
(see <a href="https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/RPI.pdf">https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/RPI.pdf</a>). The RPI
approach is intended to reduce the time needed to develop and implement
recovery plans, increase recovery plan relevance over a longer
timeframe, and add flexibility to recovery plans so they can be
adjusted to new information or circumstances. Under RPI, a recovery
plan addresses the statutorily required elements under section 4(f) of
the ESA, including site-specific management actions, objective and
measurable recovery criteria, and the estimated time and cost to
recovery. The RPI recovery plan is supported by two supplementary
documents: A species status assessment (SSA), which describes the best
available scientific information related to the biological needs of the
species and assessment of threats, and the recovery implementation
strategy (RIS), which details the particular near-term activities
needed to implement the recovery actions identified in the recovery
plan. Under this approach, we can more nimbly incorporate new
information on species biology or details of recovery implementation by
updating these supplementary documents without concurrent revision of
the entire recovery plan, unless changes to statutorily required
elements are necessary.
Species Background
On January 6, 1997, we published a final rule (62 FR 665) to list
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses as endangered without critical habitat.
The species is known to occur in four populations in southern
Arizona: (1) Canelo Hills, with one subpopulation on land owned and
managed by The Nature Conservancy and another on U.S. Forest Service
land; the most recent observation of the species here included 5
individuals counted in 2002; (2) Turkey Creek, on private lands, where
6 individuals were counted in 2021; (3) San Rafael Valley, on private
lands, where 80 plants were counted in 2021; and (4) Babocomari, on
private lands, where the species was last observed in 2008.
There are no plants at botanical gardens; however, in 2016 seed
from a single population was preserved, and in late 2020 a proposal was
funded to begin in vitro propagation and cultivation at the Desert
Botanical Garden in Phoenix, Arizona.
The primary ongoing threats to Canelo Hills ladies-tresses include
loss or reduction of ci[eacute]nega (desert wetland) habitat, herbivory
or seed predation by vertebrates and invertebrates, pollinator decline,
low numbers and limited distribution, and drought and climate change.
Recovery Criteria
The draft recovery criteria are summarized below. For a complete
description of the rationale behind the criteria, the recovery
strategy, management actions, and estimated time and costs associated
with recovery, refer to the draft recovery plan for Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses (see ADDRESSES, above, for document availability).
The ultimate recovery goal is to delist Canelo Hills ladies-tresses
by ensuring the long-term viability of the species in the wild. In the
recovery plan, we define the following criteria for delisting (i.e.,
removal of the species from the List of Endangered and Threatened
Plants).
Delisting Criteria
Criterion 1: All four existing populations (Canelo Hills, Turkey
Creek, San Rafael Valley, and Babocomari) are viable, and at least
three new viable populations are established in strategic sites. To be
considered viable, all seven populations must contain a minimum of 100
individuals each, for a total of 25 years over a 35-year period, as
indicated by annual monitoring, including during the last two
monitoring events. At least three of these populations must contain a
minimum of two subpopulations separated by less than 960 meters (the
distance a primary pollinator can travel). In addition, two of the
seven populations must each contain a minimum of 650 individuals on at
least two occasions during the 35-year period mentioned above. Existing
or newly established populations may be augmented for 5 out of the
first 25 years to achieve these numbers; no augmentation can occur in
the last 10 years of the 35-year period. All populations must have
documented natural recruitment and not show more than 10 percent loss
of seed production to herbivory or predation during two or more
monitoring events within the last 10 years of the 35-year period.
Criterion 2: A collection of seed representing the geographical,
morphological, and genetic diversity of Canelo Hills ladies-tresses is
maintained in multiple Center for Plant Conservation partner botanical
or seed storage institutions for conservation purposes.
Criterion 3: A living collection of plants representing the
geographical, morphological, and genetic diversity of Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses is established within 10 years and maintained in
perpetuity in multiple botanical institutions for educational and
conservation purposes.
Criterion 4: Ci[eacute]negas supporting the four populations of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses (Canelo Hills, Turkey Creek, San Rafael
Valley, and Babocomari), plus those ci[eacute]negas supporting at least
three newly established populations, are protected in perpetuity
through a conservation easement, habitat
[[Page 71077]]
conservation plan, or other conservation mechanism appropriate to the
land status. In addition, conservation easements or other conservation
mechanisms appropriate to the land status are held on neighboring
lands, such that new developments (e.g., residential, agricultural, and
commercial) are minimized and do not impact groundwater availability in
the ci[eacute]negas supporting Canelo Hills ladies-tresses populations.
Criterion 5: In fulfillment of Criterion 4, above, conservation and
management programs and plans address the threats of ci[eacute]nega
habitat loss, direct loss of Canelo Hills ladies-tresses, and
pollinator decline to ensure continued existence of the species. The
following requirements must be met: (a) Site-specific plans are
developed and fully implemented, such that competing native and
nonnative vegetation is reduced to a level that ensures Canelo Hills
ladies-tresses is not shaded and their vigor is not negatively
affected; a more natural fire or other disturbance regime is
maintained; natural spring flow supporting cienegas is increased by
reducing water loss and increasing water conservation and recharge;
moist soil ci[eacute]nega habitat is increased; predation and herbivory
are minimized; and native plant diversity is maintained, thus promoting
native pollinators; and (b) data on the conservation and management of
Canelo Hills ladies-tresses are collected and shared between land
managers and researchers.
Peer Review
In accordance with our policy, ``Notice of Interagency Cooperative
Policy for Peer Review in Endangered Species Act Activities,'' which we
published on July 1, 1994 (59 FR 34270), and our August 22, 2016,
Memorandum, ``Peer Review Process,'' we have sought the expert opinion
of at least three appropriate and independent specialists regarding
scientific data and interpretations contained in the species biological
report and the draft recovery plan. We have ensured that the opinions
of peer reviewers were objective and unbiased by following the
guidelines set forth in the 2016 Memorandum, which updates and
clarifies our policy on peer review. The purpose of such review was to
ensure that our decisions are based on scientifically sound data,
assumptions, and analysis. We have addressed peer review comments and
incorporated changes in the publicly available version of the SSA and
this version of the draft recovery plan.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires us to provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and comment during recovery plan
development. Substantive comments may or may not result in changes to
the recovery plan. Comments regarding recovery plan implementation will
be forwarded as appropriate to Federal or other entities so that they
can be taken into account during the course of implementation of
recovery actions.
We invite written comments on this draft recovery plan. In
particular, we are interested in additional information regarding the
current threats to the species, ongoing beneficial management efforts,
and the costs associated with implementing the recommended recovery
actions. We are specifically seeking comments on the following
questions:
<bullet> Understanding that the time and cost presented in the
draft recovery plan will be fine-tuned as the RIS is implemented, are
the estimated time and cost to recovery presented here realistic? Is
the estimate reflective of the time and cost of actions that may have
already been implemented by Federal, State, county, or other agencies?
If not, please provide suggestions or methods for determining a more
accurate estimation.
<bullet> Do the draft recovery criteria provide clear direction to
partners on what is needed to recover Canelo Hills ladies-tresses? How
could they be improved for clarity?
<bullet> Are the draft recovery criteria both objective and
measurable given the information available for Canelo Hills ladies-
tresses? Please provide suggestions.
<bullet> Understanding that specific, detailed, and area-specific
recovery activities have been developed in the RIS, do the draft
recovery actions presented in the draft recovery plan generally cover
the types of actions necessary to meet the recovery criteria? If not,
what general actions are missing? Are any of the draft recovery actions
unnecessary for achieving recovery? Have we prioritized the actions
appropriately?
The SSA is available as a supporting document for the draft
recovery plan, but we are not seeking comments on that document. We
will consider all comments we receive by the date specified in DATES,
above, prior to final approval of the plan.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments we receive, including names and addresses, will become
part of the administrative record and will be available to the public.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--will be publicly available. While you may request in your
comment that we withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan and publish this notice under
the authority of section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Amy Lueders,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-27013 Filed 12-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 14, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.