Home/Federal/Federal Register/2021-24099

Rule2021-24099

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks, Surface Coating of Metal Cans, Boat Manufacturing, and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing; Technical Correction

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published

November 19, 2021

Effective

November 19, 2021

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

In this action, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making technical corrections to four regulations under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) program. Specifically, the rules to be amended by this action include the following: The NESHAP for Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks, promulgated on July 8, 2020; the NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal Cans, promulgated on February 25, 2020; the NESHAP for Boat Manufacturing, promulgated on March 20, 2020; and the NESHAP for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, promulgated on November 1, 2019. Following signature of each of these final rules, the EPA discovered inadvertent minor errors and is correcting these errors in this action.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 221 (Friday, November 19, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 221 (Friday, November 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66038-66044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24099]

[[Page 66037]]

Vol. 86

Friday,

No. 221

November 19, 2021

Part III

Environmental Protection Agency

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

40 CFR Part 63

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface
Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks, Surface Coating of Metal
Cans, Boat Manufacturing, and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing; Technical
Correction; National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Refractory Products Manufacturing Residual Risk and Technology Review;
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Carbon Black
Production and Cyanide Chemicals Manufacturing Residual Risk and
Technology Reviews, and Carbon Black Production Area Source Technology
Review; National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paint
Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources
Technology Review; Final Rules and Proposed Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 86 , No. 221 / Friday, November 19, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 66038]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0314, EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0684, EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0447, EPA-
HQ-OAR-2013-0290; FRL-8472-01-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT49, 2060-AT51, 2060-AT12, and 2060-AT25

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this action, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is making technical corrections to four regulations under the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) program.
Specifically, the rules to be amended by this action include the
following: The NESHAP for Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks, promulgated on July 8, 2020; the NESHAP for Surface Coating of
Metal Cans, promulgated on February 25, 2020; the NESHAP for Boat
Manufacturing, promulgated on March 20, 2020; and the NESHAP for Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing, promulgated on November 1, 2019. Following
signature of each of these final rules, the EPA discovered inadvertent
minor errors and is correcting these errors in this action.

DATES: This final rule is effective on November 19, 2021. The
incorporation by reference (IBR) of certain publications listed in the
rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of November
19, 2021. The incorporation by reference of certain other publications
listed in the rule was approved by the Director of the Federal Register
as of June 25, 2004 and July 8, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for each rule included in
this action under the following: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0314
(NESHAP for Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks),
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0684 (NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal
Cans), Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0447 (NESHAP for Boat
Manufacturing), and Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0290 (NESHAP for Clay
Ceramic Manufacturing). All documents in each docket are listed on the
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a> website. Although listed, some information
is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a>. Out of an abundance of caution
for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Docket Center and
Reading Room are closed to the public, with limited exceptions, to
reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will
continue to provide remote customer service via email, phone, and
webform. For further information on EPA Docket Center services and the
current status, please visit us online at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this final action,
contact Mr. Brian Storey, Sector Policies and Programs Division (D243-
04), Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541-1103; fax number: (919) 541-4991; and email
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7b4b3a8b5a2bee9a5b5aea6a987a2b7a6e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4437302b36213d6a26362d252a042134256a232b32">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Summary of This Action

Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. The EPA has determined
that for this action, there is good cause for making these technical
corrections final without a prior proposal and the opportunity for
comment because the Agency is correcting minor errors that do not
substantially change the Agency action taken in each of the four final
rules discussed. These technical corrections will ensure that the
regulatory text agrees with the description of the rule that the EPA
provided in the final rule preamble for each of the four rules
discussed in this action. Thus, notice and comment public procedures
are unnecessary. The Agency finds that this constitutes a good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). See also the final sentence of section
307(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 307(d)(1), indicating
that the good cause provisions in subsection 553(b) of the APA continue
to apply to this type of rulemaking under section 307(d) of the CAA.
Refer to sections I.A through I.D of this preamble for a more detailed
discussion of the goof cause rationale for each rule.

A. Summary of Technical Corrections to the NESHAP for Surface Coating
of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks and Incorporation by Reference

In the July 8, 2020, final rule (85 FR 41100) the EPA included
reference to the document, Protocol for Determining the Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Topcoat, published December 1988 (EPA-450/3-88-018). This document was
found to be out-of-date. In this action, the EPA is amending the rule
to refer to the document, Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat, published September 2008 (EPA-453/R-08-
002). This protocol determines the daily VOC emission rate (pounds of
VOC per gallon of coating solids deposited) for a complete auto and
light duty truck topcoat operation. The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, the EPA document generally available electronically through
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov/">https://www.regulations.gov/</a> and at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). A copy of the
red line version of the corrected rule language is available in Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0314. The intent of the rule remains unchanged
by correcting the reference. The protocols provided by the revised
September 2008 document (EPA-453/R-08-002) are consistent with the
protocols of the December 1988 document (EPA-450/3-88-018); therefore,
the EPA finds good cause to make the correction in this direct final
action.

B. Summary of Technical Corrections to the NESHAP for Surface Coating
of Metal Cans

The publication of the February 25, 2020, final rule (85 FR 10828)
inadvertently deleted Equation 1 of the rule from the text of the Code
of Federal Regulations. This equation was not intended to be deleted.
In this action, the EPA is restoring the deleted equation and the
associated definitions to Sec. 63.3541(h). A red line version of the
corrected rule language is available in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-
0684. Equation 1 is used to calculate organic HAP emission reductions
from controlled coating operations not using

[[Page 66039]]

liquid-liquid material balances. Equation 1 was not part of the 2020
final rule amendments and was already in the rule prior to the
amendments. Section 63.3541(h) of the rule references Equation 1, and
without the equation, the reference is incomplete; therefore, the EPA
finds good cause to make the correction in this direct final action.

C. Summary of Technical Corrections to the NESHAP for Boat
Manufacturing

Table 8 of the March 20, 2020, final rule (85 FR 15960) included
specific references to the general provisions of 40 CFR part 63,
subpart A. After promulgation, the EPA found that Table 8 indicates
that 40 CFR 63.6(f) applies to the rule, but, in fact, section
63.6(f)(1) includes start-up, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) language
that has been vacated by the D.C. Circuit and the EPA stated in the
preamble the Agency intended to remove from the Boat Manufacturing
NESHAP (85 FR at 15963 and 15967-68). In this action, the EPA is
revising Table 8 to indicate Sec. 63.6(f)(1) does not apply. A red
line version of the corrected rule language is available in Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0447. The correction to the reference in Table 8
only corrects the reference to subpart A and does not change the
requirement to comply with emission limits of the rule at all times, as
addressed in the proposed and final rule preamble. These corrections
will ensure that the regulatory text agrees with the description of the
rule that was provided in the final rule preamble; therefore, the EPA
finds good cause to make the correction in this direct final action.

D. Summary of Technical Corrections to the NESHAP for Clay Ceramic
Manufacturing

Following signature of the November 1, 2019, final rule (84 FR
58601), the EPA discovered inadvertent errors in Table 2 of the rule.
In several instances, the rows of the table were misaligned when
published. Table 2 of the rule provides operating limits for regulated
emission sources and their various control technology configurations
and includes three columns. As a result of the error in publication,
several of the control technologies identified in the rightmost column
(column 3) were misaligned with the sources identified in the leftmost
column (column 1), so that they no longer were appropriate or relevant.
In this action, the EPA is correcting the table to ensure the control
technology information is relevant to the appropriate source. In
addition, the EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) URL included a
typographical error rendering the weblink, as written in the rule text,
inoperable. This action corrects the URL of the weblink to ensure
accessibility of the tool. A red line version of the corrected rule
language is available in Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0290. The
corrections to Table 8 and to the URL do not affect the standards of
the rule, and only ensure the information provided is accurate and
relevant; therefore, the EPA finds good cause to make the correction in
this direct final action.

II. Summary of Cost, Environmental, and Economic Impacts

This action will have no cost, environmental, energy, or economic
impacts beyond those impacts presented in the July 8, 2020, NESHAP for
Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks final rule (85 FR
41100), the February 25, 2020, NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal Cans
final rule (85 FR 10828), the March 20, 2020, NESHAP for Boat
Manufacturing final rule (85 FR 15960), and the October 26, 2015 NESHAP
for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing final rule (84 FR 58601). The technical
corrections are cost neutral.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

Environmental protection, Administrative practices and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

Joseph Goffman,
Office of Air and Radiation, Acting Assistant Administrator.

For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 63 is
corrected as follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
2. Section 63.14 is amended by revising paragraph (n)(1) to read as
follows:

Sec. 63.14 Incorporations by reference.

* * * * *
(n) * * *
(1) EPA-453/R-08-002, Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat, published September 2008, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 63.3130(c), 63.3161(d) and (g), 63.3165(e), and appendix A
to subpart IIII.
* * * * *

Subpart IIII--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks

0
3. Section 63.3130 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(4) and (5) to
read as follows:

Sec. 63.3130 What records must I keep?

* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) A record of the calculation of the organic HAP emission rate
for electrodeposition primer, primer-surfacer, topcoat, final repair,
glass bonding primer, and glass bonding adhesive plus all coatings and
thinners, except for deadener materials and for adhesive and sealer
materials that are not components of glass bonding systems, used in
coating operations added to the affected source pursuant to Sec.
63.3082(c) for each month if subject to the emission limit of Sec.
63.3090(a) or Sec. 63.3091(a). This record must include all raw data,
algorithms, and intermediate calculations. If the guidelines presented
in the ``Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound
Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-Surfacer and
Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
63.14), are used, you must keep records of all data input to this
protocol. If these data are maintained as electronic files, the
electronic files, as well as any paper copies must be maintained. These
data must be provided to the permitting authority on request on paper,
and in (if calculations are done electronically) electronic form.
(5) A record of the calculation of the organic HAP emission rate
for primer-surfacer, topcoat, final repair, glass bonding primer, and
glass bonding adhesive plus all coatings and thinners, except for
deadener materials and for adhesive and sealer materials that are not
components of glass bonding systems, used in coating operations added
to the affected source pursuant to Sec. 63.3082(c) for each month if
subject to the emission limit of Sec. 63.3090(b) or Sec. 63.3091(b),
and a record of the weight fraction of each organic HAP in each
material added to the electrodeposition primer system if subject to the
limitations of Sec. 63.3092(a). This record

[[Page 66040]]

must include all raw data, algorithms, and intermediate calculations.
If the guidelines presented in the ``Protocol for Determining the Daily
Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty
Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14), are used, you must keep records of all
data input to this protocol. If these data are maintained as electronic
files, the electronic files, as well as any paper copies must be
maintained. These data must be provided to the permitting authority on
request on paper, and in (if calculations are done electronically)
electronic form.
* * * * *

0
4. Section 63.3161 is amended by revising paragraphs (d) and (g) to
read as follows:

Sec. 63.3161 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?

* * * * *
(d) Compliance with emission limits. You must follow the procedures
in paragraphs (e) through (o) of this section to demonstrate compliance
with the applicable emission limit in Sec. 63.3090(a) or Sec.
63.3091(a). You may also use the guidelines presented in ``Protocol for
Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/
R-08-002 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14) in making this
demonstration.
* * * * *
(g) Determine the transfer efficiency for each coating. You must
determine the transfer efficiency for each primer-surfacer and topcoat
coating, and for all coatings, except for deadener and for adhesive and
sealer that are not components of glass bonding systems, used in
coating operations added to the affected source pursuant to Sec.
63.3082(c) using ASTM Method D5066-91 (Reapproved 2017), ``Standard
Test Method for Determination of the Transfer Efficiency
UnderProduction Conditions for Spray Application of Automotive Paints-
Weight Basis'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14), or the
guidelines presented in ``Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 63.14). You may conduct transfer efficiency
testing on representative coatings and for representative spray booths
as described in ``Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-
Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 63.14). You may assume 100 percent transfer efficiency for
electrodeposition primer coatings, glass bonding primers, and glass
bonding adhesives. For final repair coatings, you may assume 40 percent
transfer efficiency for air atomized spray and 55 percent transfer
efficiency for electrostatic spray and high volume, low pressure spray.
For blackout, chip resistant edge primer, interior color, inline
repair, lower body anti-chip coatings, or underbody anti-chip coatings,
you may assume 40 percent transfer efficiency for air atomized spray,
55 percent transfer efficiency for electrostatic spray and high volume-
low pressure spray, and 80 percent transfer efficiency for airless
spray.
* * * * *

0
5. Section 63.3165 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (e) introductory text, and
0
b. In Equation 6 of paragraph (e)(2), Equation 7 of paragraph (e)(3),
and Equation 8 of paragraph (e)(4) remove the text `Protocol for
Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations, EPA-450/3-88-018'',
and add, in its place, the text ``Protocol for Determining the Daily
Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty
Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat, EPA-453/R-08-002''.
The revision reads as follows:

Sec. 63.3165 How do I determine the emission capture system
efficiency?

* * * * *
(e) Panel testing to determine the capture efficiency of flash-off
or bake oven emissions. You may conduct panel testing to determine the
capture efficiency of flash-off or bake oven emissions using ASTM
Method D5087-02, ``Standard Test Method for Determining Amount of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Solventborne Automotive
Coatings and Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device
(Abatement)'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14), ASTM Method
D6266-00a (2017), ``Test Method for Determining the Amount of Volatile
Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Waterborne Automotive Coatings and
Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device (Abatement)''
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14), or the guidelines
presented in ``Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-
Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 63.14). You may conduct panel testing on representative coatings
as described in ``Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-
Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 63.14).
* * * * *

0
6. Amend Appendix A to subpart IIII of part 63 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2 of section 2.0, and
0
b. In section 4.0:
0
i. Revising paragraph 4.1; and
0
ii. In section 4.2 Equation A-4, remove the text ``Protocol for
Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations, EPA-450/3-88-018'',
and add, in its place, the text ``Protocol for Determining the Daily
Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty
Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat,EPA-453/R-08-002''.
The revisions read as follows:

Appendix A to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Determination of Capture
Efficiency of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Spray Booth Emissions
From Solvent-Borne Coatings Using Panel Testing

* * * * *
2.1 You may conduct panel testing to determine the capture
efficiency of spray booth emissions. You must follow the
instructions and calculations in this appendix A, and use the panel
testing procedures in ASTM Method D5087-02, ``Standard Test Method
for Determining Amount of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released
from Solvent-borne Automotive Coatings and Available for Removal in
a VOC Control Device (Abatement)'' (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 63.14), or the guidelines presented in ``Protocol for
Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-
453/R-08-002 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14). You must
weigh panels at the points described in section 2.5 of this appendix
A and perform calculations as described in sections 3 and 4 of this
appendix A. You may conduct panel tests on the production paint line
in your facility or in a laboratory simulation of the production
paint line in your facility.
2.2 You may conduct panel testing on representative coatings as
described in ``Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-
Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002 (incorporated by reference,
see Sec. 63.14). If you panel test representative coatings, then
you may calculate either a unique percent

[[Page 66041]]

capture efficiency value for each coating grouped with that
representative coating, or a composite percent capture efficiency
value for the group of coatings. If you panel test each coating,
then you must convert the panel test result for each coating to a
unique percent capture efficiency value for that coating.
* * * * *
4.1 If you panel test representative coatings, then you may
convert the panel test result for each representative coating from
section 3.3 of this appendix A either to a unique percent capture
efficiency value for each coating grouped with that representative
coating by using coating specific values for the mass fraction
coating solids and mass fraction VOC in section 4.2 of this appendix
A, or to a composite percent capture efficiency value for the group
of coatings by using the average values for the group of coatings
for mass fraction coating solids and mass fraction VOC in section
4.2 of this appendix A. If you panel test each coating, then you
must convert the panel test result for each coating to a unique
percent capture efficiency value by using coating specific values
for the mass fraction coating solids and mass fraction VOC in
section 4.2 of this appendix A. The mass fraction of VOC in the
coating and the mass fraction of solids in the coating must be
determined by Method 24 (appendix A-7 to 40 CFR part 60) or by
following the guidelines for combining analytical VOC content and
formulation solvent content presented in ``Protocol for Determining
the Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and
Light-Duty Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat'' EPA-453/R-08-002
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14).
* * * * *

Subpart KKKK--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Surface Coating of Metal Cans

0
7. Section 63.3541 is amended by revising paragraph (h) to read as
follows:

Sec. 63.3541 How do I demonstrate initial compliance?

* * * * *
(h) Calculate the organic HAP emission reduction for each
controlled coating operation not using liquid-liquid material balances.
For each controlled coating operation using an emission capture system
and add-on control device, other than a solvent recovery system for
which you conduct liquid-liquid material balances, calculate the
organic HAP emission reduction, using Equation 1 of this section. The
calculation applies the emission capture system efficiency and add-on
control device efficiency to the mass of organic HAP contained in the
coatings and thinners that are used in the coating operation served by
the emission capture system and add-on control device during each
month. For any period of time a deviation specified in Sec. 63.3542(c)
or (d) occurs in the controlled coating operation, you must assume zero
efficiency for the emission capture system and add-on control device,
unless you have other data indicating the actual efficiency of the
emission capture system and add-on control device, and the use of these
data has been approved by the Administrator. Equation 1 of this section
treats the materials used during such a deviation as if they were used
on an uncontrolled coating operation for the time period of the
deviation.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR18NO21.081

Where:

H<INF>c</INF> = Mass of organic HAP emission reduction for the
controlled coating operation during the month, kg.
A<INF>c</INF> = Total mass of organic HAP in the coatings used in
the controlled coating operation during the month, kg, as calculated
in Equation 1A of this section.
B<INF>c</INF> = Total mass of organic HAP in the thinners used in
the controlled coating operation during the month, kg, as calculated
in Equation 1B of this section.
H<INF>unc</INF> = Total mass of organic HAP in the coatings and
thinners used during all deviations specified in Sec. 63.3542(c)
and (d) that occurred during the month in the controlled coating
operation, kg, as calculated in Equation 1C of this section.
CE = Capture efficiency of the emission capture system vented to the
add-on control device, percent. Use the test methods and procedures
specified in Sec. Sec. 63.3543 and 63.3544 to measure and record
capture efficiency.
DRE = Organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency of the add-on
control device, percent. Use the test methods and procedures in
Sec. Sec. 63.3543 and 63.3545 to measure and record the organic HAP
destruction or removal efficiency.
* * * * *

Subpart VVVV--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Boat Manufacturing

0
8. Table 8 to subpart VVVV of part 63 is revised to read as follows:

Table 8 to Subpart VVVV of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions
(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A) to Subpart VVVV

As specified in Sec. 63.5773, you must comply with the applicable
requirements of the General Provisions according to the following
table:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citation Requirement Applies to subpart VVVV Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 63.1(a).......................... General Applicability Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.1(b).......................... Initial Applicability Yes. .....................
Determination.
Sec. 63.1(c)(1)....................... Applicability After Yes. .....................
Standard Established.
Sec. 63.1(c)(2)....................... ..................... Yes..................... Area sources are not
regulated by subpart
VVVV.
Sec. 63.1(c)(3)....................... ..................... No...................... [Reserved].
Sec. 63.1(c)(4)-(5)................... ..................... Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.1(d).......................... ..................... No...................... [Reserved].
Sec. 63.1(e).......................... Applicability of Yes. .....................
Permit Program.
Sec. 63.2............................. Definitions.......... Yes..................... Additional
definitions are
found in Sec.
63.5779.
Sec. 63.3............................. Units and Yes. .....................
Abbreviations.
Sec. 63.4(a).......................... Prohibited Activities Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.4(b)-(c)...................... Circumvention/ Yes. .....................
Severability.
Sec. 63.5(a).......................... Construction/ Yes. .....................
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(b).......................... Requirements for Yes. .....................
Existing, Newly
Constructed, and
Reconstructed
Sources.

[[Page 66042]]

Sec. 63.5(c).......................... ..................... No...................... [Reserved].
Sec. 63.5(d).......................... Application for Yes. .....................
Approval of
Construction/
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(e).......................... Approval of Yes. .....................
Construction/
Reconstruction.
Sec. 63.5(f).......................... Approval of Yes. .....................
Construction/
Reconstruction Based
on prior State
Review.
Sec. 63.6(a).......................... Compliance with Yes. .....................
Standards and
Maintenance
Requirements--Applic
ability.
Sec. 63.6(b).......................... Compliance Dates for Yes..................... Sec. 63.695
New and specifies compliance
Reconstructed dates, including the
Sources. compliance date for
new area sources
that become major
sources after the
effective date of
the rule.
Sec. 63.6(c).......................... Compliance Dates for Yes..................... Sec. 63.5695
Existing Sources. specifies compliance
dates, including the
compliance date for
existing area
sources that become
major sources after
the effective date
of the rule.
Sec. 63.6(d).......................... ..................... No...................... [Reserved].
Sec. 63.6(e)(1)-(2)................... Operation and No...................... Operating
Maintenance requirements for
Requirements. open molding
operations with add-
on controls are
specified in Sec.
63.5725.
Sec. 63.6(e)(3)....................... Startup, Shut Down, No...................... Only sources with add-
and Malfunction on controls must
Plans. complete startup,
shutdown, and
malfunction plans.
Sec. 63.6(f)(1)....................... ..................... No. .....................
Sec. 63.6(f)(2)-(3)................... Compliance with Yes. .....................
Nonopacity Emission
Standards.
Sec. 63.6(g).......................... Use of an Alternative Yes. .....................
Nonopacity Emission
Standard.
Sec. 63.6(h).......................... Compliance with No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
Opacity/Visible specify opacity or
Emissions Standards. visible emission
standards.
Sec. 63.6(i).......................... Extension of Yes. .....................
Compliance with
Emission Standards.
Sec. 63.6(j).......................... Exemption from Yes. .....................
Compliance with
Emission Standards.
Sec. 63.7(a)(1)....................... Performance Test Yes. .....................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.7(a)(2)....................... Dates for performance No...................... Sec. 63.5716
tests. specifies
performance test
dates.
Sec. 63.7(a)(3)....................... Performance testing Yes. .....................
at other times.
Sec. 63.7(b)-(h)...................... Other performance Yes. .....................
testing requirements.
Sec. 63.8(a)(1)-(2)................... Monitoring Yes..................... All of Sec. 63.8
Requirements--Applic applies only to
ability. sources with add-on
controls. Additional
monitoring
requirements for
sources with add-on
controls are found
in Sec. 63.5725.
Sec. 63.8(a)(3)....................... ..................... No...................... [Reserved].
Sec. 63.8(a)(4)....................... ..................... No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
refer directly or
indirectly to Sec.
63.11.
Sec. 63.8(b)(1)....................... Conduct of Monitoring Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.8(b)(2)-(3)................... Multiple Effluents Yes..................... Applies to sources
and CMS. that use a CMS on
the control device
stack.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)(i) and (iii).......... CMS Operation and No...................... References to
Maintenance. startup, shutdown,
malfunction are not
applicable.
Sec. 63.8(c)(1)-(4)................... CMS Operation and Yes..................... Except those
Maintenance. provisions in Sec.
63.8(c)(1)(i) and
(iii) as noted
above.
Sec. 63.8(c)(5)....................... Continuous Opacity No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
Monitoring Systems have opacity or
(COMS). visible emission
standards.
Sec. 63.8(c)(6)-(8)................... CMS Calibration Yes. .....................
Checks and Out-of-
Control Periods.
Sec. 63.8(d).......................... Quality Control Yes..................... Except those
Program. provisions of Sec.
63.8(d)(3) regarding
a startup, shutdown,
malfunction plan as
noted below.
Sec. 63.8(d)(3)....................... Quality Control No...................... No requirement for a
Program. startup, shutdown,
malfunction plan.
Sec. 63.8(e).......................... CMS Performance Yes. .....................
Evaluation.
Sec. 63.8(f)(1)-(5)................... Use of an Alternative Yes. .....................
Monitoring Method.
Sec. 63.8(f)(6)....................... Alternative to Yes..................... Applies only to
Relative Accuracy sources that use
Test. continuous emission
monitoring systems
(CEMS).
Sec. 63.8(g).......................... Data Reduction....... Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.9(a).......................... Notification Yes. .....................
Requirements--Applic
ability.
Sec. 63.9(b).......................... Initial Notifications Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.9(c).......................... Request for Yes. .....................
Compliance Extension.
Sec. 63.9(d).......................... Notification That a Yes. .....................
New Source Is
Subject to Special
Compliance
Requirements.
Sec. 63.9(e).......................... Notification of Yes..................... Applies only to
Performance Test. sources with add-on
controls.

[[Page 66043]]

Sec. 63.9(f).......................... Notification of No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
Visible Emissions/ have opacity or
Opacity Test. visible emission
standards.
Sec. 63.9(g)(1)....................... Additional CMS Yes..................... Applies only to
Notifications--Date sources with add-on
of CMS Performance controls.
Evaluation.
Sec. 63.9(g)(2)....................... Use of COMS Data..... No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
require the use of
COMS.
Sec. 63.9(g)(3)....................... Alternative to Yes..................... Applies only to
Relative Accuracy sources with CEMS.
Testing.
Sec. 63.9(h).......................... Notification of Yes. .....................
Compliance Status.
Sec. 63.9(i).......................... Adjustment of Yes. .....................
Deadlines.
Sec. 63.9(j).......................... Change in Previous Yes. .....................
Information.
Sec. 63.10(a)......................... Recordkeeping/ Yes. .....................
Reporting--Applicabi
lity.
Sec. 63.10(b)(1)...................... General Recordkeeping Yes..................... Sec. Sec. 63.567
Requirements. and 63.5770 specify
additional
recordkeeping
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(i), (iii), (vi)-(xiv) General Recordkeeping Yes. .....................
Requirements.
Sec. 63.10(b)(2)(ii), (iv), (v)....... Recordkeeping No. .....................
Relevant to Startup,
Shutdown, and
Malfunction Periods.
Sec. 63.10(b)(3)...................... Recordkeeping Yes..................... Sec. 63.5686
Requirements for specifies
Applicability applicability
Determinations. determinations for
non-major sources.
Sec. 63.10(c)(1)-(14)................. Additional Yes..................... Applies only to
Recordkeeping for sources with add-on
Sources with CMS. controls.
Sec. 63.10(c)(15)..................... Additional No...................... No requirement for a
Recordkeeping for startup, shutdown,
Sources with CMS. malfunction plan.
Sec. 63.10(d)(1)...................... General Reporting Yes..................... Sec. 63.5764
Requirements. specifies additional
reporting
requirements.
Sec. 63.10(d)(2)...................... Performance Test Yes..................... Sec. 63.5764
Results. specifies additional
requirements for
reporting
performance test
results.
Sec. 63.10(d)(3)...................... Opacity or Visible No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
Emissions specify opacity or
Observations. visible emission
standards.
Sec. 63.10(d)(4)...................... Progress Reports for Yes. .....................
Sources with
Compliance
Extensions.
Sec. 63.10(d)(5)...................... Startup, Shutdown, No...................... Applies only to
and Malfunction sources with add-on
Reports. controls.
Sec. 63.10(e)(1)...................... Additional CMS Yes..................... Applies only to
Reports--General. sources with add-on
controls.
Sec. 63.10(e)(2)...................... Reporting Results of Yes..................... Applies only to
CMS Performance sources with add-on
Evaluations. controls.
Sec. 63.10(e)(3)...................... Excess Emissions/CMS Yes..................... Applies only to
Performance Reports. sources with add-on
controls.
Sec. 63.10(e)(4)...................... COMS Data Reports.... No...................... Subpart VVVV does not
specify opacity or
visible emission
standards.
Sec. 63.10(f)......................... Recordkeeping/ Yes. .....................
Reporting Waiver.
Sec. 63.11............................ Control Device No...................... Facilities subject to
Requirements--Applic subpart VVVV do not
ability. use flares as
control devices.
Sec. 63.12............................ State Authority and Yes..................... Sec. 63.5776 lists
Delegations. those sections of
subpart A that are
not delegated.
Sec. 63.13............................ Addresses............ Yes. .....................
Sec. 63.14............................ Incorporation by Yes. .....................
Reference.
Sec. 63.15............................ Availability of Yes. .....................
Information/
Confidentiality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subpart KKKKK--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Clay Ceramics Manufacturing

0
9. Section 63.8635 is amended by revising (g)(1) to read as follows:

Sec. 63.8635 What reports must I submit and when?

* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT website
(<a href="https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-reporting-tool-ert">https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-reporting-tool-ert</a>) at the time of the test, you must submit the
results of the performance test to the EPA via the Compliance and
Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can be accessed
through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (<a href="https://cdx.epa.gov/">https://cdx.epa.gov/</a>).)
Performance test data must be submitted in a file format generated
through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file format
consistent with the extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on
the EPA's ERT website. If you claim that some of the performance test
information being submitted is confidential business information (CBI),
you must submit a complete file generated through the use of the EPA's
ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema
listed on the EPA's ERT website, including information claimed to be
CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive, or other commonly used electronic
storage media to the EPA. The electronic media must be clearly marked
as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAPQS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group
Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd.,
Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI omitted
must be submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described earlier in
this paragraph (g)(1).
* * * * *

0
10. Table 2 to subpart KKKKK of part 63 is revised to read as follows:

Table 2 to Subpart KKKKK of Part 63--Operating Limits

As stated in Sec. 63.8555, you must meet each operating limit in
the following table that applies to you:

[[Page 66044]]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each . . . You must . . . Or you must . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Tunnel or roller kiln equipped with a. If you use a bag leak detection i. Maintain no VE from the
a DIFF or DLS/FF.. system, initiate corrective action DIFF or DLS/FF stack; or
within 1 hour of a bag leak detection ii. Maintain your kiln
system alarm and complete corrective operating temperature within
actions in accordance with your OM&M the range of acceptable
plan; operate and maintain the fabric temperatures (i.e.,
filter such that the alarm is not temperature profile)
engaged for more than 5 percent of the established for each kiln and
total operating time in a 6-month block product.
reporting period; and
b. Maintain free-flowing lime in the
feed hopper or silo and to the APCD at
all times for continuous injection
systems; maintain the feeder setting
(on a per ton of throughput basis) at
or above the level established during
the performance test for continuous
injection systems in which compliance
was demonstrated..
2. Tunnel or roller kiln equipped with a. Maintain the average scrubber liquid
a WS.. pH for each 3-hour block period at or
above the average scrubber liquid pH
established during the HF/HCl
performance test in which compliance
was demonstrated; and
b. Maintain the average scrubber liquid
flow rate for each 3-hour block period
at or above the highest average
scrubber liquid flow rate established
during the HF/HCl and PM performance
tests in which compliance was
demonstrated..
3. Tunnel or roller kiln equipped with Maintain the 3-hour block average carbon
an ACI system.. flow rate at or above the highest
average carbon flow rate established
during the Hg and dioxin/furan
performance tests in which compliance
was demonstrated.
4. Tunnel or roller kiln intending to Maintain the average operating
comply with dioxin/furan emission temperature for each 12-hour block
limit without an ACI system. period at or below the highest
operating temperature established
during the dioxin/furan performance
test in which compliance was
demonstrated
5. Tunnel or roller kiln with no add- a. Maintain no VE from the stack; and i. Maintain your kiln
on control. b. Maintain the kiln process rate at or operating temperature within
below the kiln process rate determined the range of acceptable
according to Sec. 63.8595(g)(1) if temperatures (i.e.,
your total facility maximum potential temperature profile)
HCl-equivalent emissions are greater established for each kiln and
than the HCl-equivalent limit in Table product.
1 to this subpart; and.
c. Maintain the average operating
temperature for each 12-hour block
period at or below the highest
operating temperature established
during the dioxin/furan performance
test in which compliance was
demonstrated..
6. Glaze spray operation equipped with a. If you use a bag leak detection i. Maintain no VE from the FF
a FF. system, initiate corrective action stack.
within 1 hour of a bag leak detection
system alarm and complete corrective
actions in accordance with your OM&M
plan; operate and maintain the fabric
filter such that the alarm is not
engaged for more than 5 percent of the
total operating time in a 6-month block
reporting period.
7. Glaze spray operation equipped with a. Maintain the average scrubber
a WS.. pressure drop for each 3-hour block
period at or above the average pressure
drop established during the PM
performance test in which compliance
was demonstrated; and
b. Maintain the average scrubber liquid
flow rate for each 3-hour block period
at or above the average scrubber liquid
flow rate established during the PM
performance test in which compliance
was demonstrated..
8. Glaze spray operation equipped with a. Conduct daily inspections to verify
a water curtain.. the presence of water flow to the wet
control system; and
b. Conduct annual inspections of the
interior of the control equipment (if
applicable) to determine the structural
integrity and condition of the control
equipment..
9. Glaze spray operation equipped with Conduct an annual visual inspection of
baffles. the baffles to confirm the baffles are
in place.
10. Spray dryer....................... Maintain the average operating
temperature for each 4-hour block
period at or above the average
temperature established during the
dioxin/furan performance test in which
compliance was demonstrated.
11. Floor tile press dryer............ Maintain the average operating
temperature for each 4-hour block
period at or below the average
temperature established during the
dioxin/furan performance test in which
compliance was demonstrated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-24099 Filed 11-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>

View on FederalRegister.gov →Plain-text source

Indexed from Federal Register on November 19, 2021.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.