Rule2021-22611
Denial of Petition for Reconsideration and Administrative Stay: “Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR): Project Emissions Accounting”
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 18, 2021
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice that it has responded to a petition for reconsideration and administrative stay of a final action under the Clean Air Act (CAA) published in the Federal Register on November 24, 2020, titled, "Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR): Project Emissions Accounting," ("Project Emissions Accounting rule"). On January 22, 2021, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), the Sierra Club, and the Adirondack Council ("petitioners") submitted a petition requesting that the EPA reconsider and stay the effective date of the Project Emissions Accounting rule. The EPA has denied this petition in a letter to the petitioners for the reasons that the EPA explains in that letter. The EPA is not taking action at this time on the petitioners' additional request to withdraw the memorandum titled "Project Emissions Accounting Under the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program" (March 13, 2018) ("March 2018 Memorandum").
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 198 (Monday, October 18, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 198 (Monday, October 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57585-57586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22611]
[[Page 57585]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51 and 52
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0464; FRL-8992-01-OAR]
Denial of Petition for Reconsideration and Administrative Stay:
``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New
Source Review (NNSR): Project Emissions Accounting''
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notification of action denying petition for reconsideration and
administrative stay.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice
that it has responded to a petition for reconsideration and
administrative stay of a final action under the Clean Air Act (CAA)
published in the Federal Register on November 24, 2020, titled,
``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New
Source Review (NNSR): Project Emissions Accounting,'' (``Project
Emissions Accounting rule''). On January 22, 2021, the Environmental
Defense Fund (EDF), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the
Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), the Sierra Club, and the
Adirondack Council (``petitioners'') submitted a petition requesting
that the EPA reconsider and stay the effective date of the Project
Emissions Accounting rule. The EPA has denied this petition in a letter
to the petitioners for the reasons that the EPA explains in that
letter. The EPA is not taking action at this time on the petitioners'
additional request to withdraw the memorandum titled ``Project
Emissions Accounting Under the New Source Review Preconstruction
Permitting Program'' (March 13, 2018) (``March 2018 Memorandum'').
DATES: October 18, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tanya Abrahamian, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail
Code C539-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; phone number: (919)
541-5690; email address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcdddeceddd4ddd1d5ddd292c8ddd2c5ddfcd9ccdd92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d0c0f1f0c050c00040c0343190c03140c2d081d0c430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Where can I get copies of this document and other related
information?
This Federal Register document, the petition for reconsideration
and administrative stay, and the response letter to the petitioners are
available in the docket that the EPA established for the Project
Emissions Accounting rulemaking, under Docket ID NO. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-
0048.
All documents in the docket are listed in the index at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Although listed in the index, some information may
not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Due to public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA Docket
Center and Reading Room are open to the public by appointment only. Our
Docket Center staff also continues to provide remote customer service
via email, phone, and webform. Hand deliveries or couriers will be
received by scheduled appointment only. For further information and
updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us online at
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area
health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond
rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.
In addition, the EPA has established a website for the New Source
Review permitting program, including New Source Review rulemakings, at:
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/nsr">https://www.epa.gov/nsr</a>. This Federal Register document, the petition
for reconsideration and administrative stay, and the response letter
denying the petition are also available on this website along with
other information.
II. Judicial Review
Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA governs judicial review of final
actions by the EPA. This section provides, in part, that petitions for
review must be filed in the Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit: (i) When the agency action consists of ``nationally
applicable regulations promulgated, or final actions taken, by the
Administrator,'' or (ii) when such action is locally or regionally
applicable, if ``such action is based on a determination of nationwide
scope or effect and if in taking such action the Administrator finds
and publishes that such action is based on such a determination.''
Judicial challenges to the EPA's denials of petitions for
reconsideration of CAA actions belong in the same venue as any
challenge to the action that such petitions request the agency to
reconsider.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Cf. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Thomas, 838 F.2d
1224, 1249 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (the clause in CAA section 307(b)
governing ``nationally applicable regulations'' provides
jurisdiction over both the direct challenge to the regulations and
the petition for reconsideration).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 19, 2021, the States of New Jersey, Maryland, Minnesota,
Oregon, and Washington, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia filed a
petition for review of the Project Emissions Accounting rule in the
D.C. Circuit. On January 22, 2021, EDF, NRDC, EIP, the Sierra Club, and
the Adirondack Council filed a petition for review on the same action
in the D.C. Circuit. Those cases have been consolidated and are
temporarily being held in abeyance.
The D.C. Circuit is the appropriate venue for challenges to the
final action titled, ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR): Project Emissions
Accounting,'' 85 FR 74890 (November 24, 2020), because it is nationally
applicable. See 85 FR 74908. Therefore, challenges to the action
denying the administrative petition on the Project Emissions Accounting
rule must also be filed in the D.C. Circuit.
Under CAA section 307(b), any petition for review of this action
denying the petitions for reconsideration and/or stay must be filed in
the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit within 60
days from the date this document is published in the Federal Register.
III. Description of Action
On November 24, 2020, the EPA finalized the Project Emissions
Accounting rule, which codified in the New Source Review (NSR)
regulations the EPA's interpretation of the NSR applicability test
contained in the March 2018 Memorandum.\2\ That memorandum and the
subsequent Project Emissions Accounting rule
[[Page 57586]]
clarified that both increases and decreases in emissions resulting from
a proposed project can be considered in Step 1 of the NSR major
modification applicability test.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Memorandum from E. Scott Pruitt, to Regional Administrators,
``Project Emissions Accounting Under the New Source Review
Preconstruction Permitting Program,'' March 13, 2018 available at:
<a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-03/documents/nsr_memo_03-13-2018.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-03/documents/nsr_memo_03-13-2018.pdf</a>. The March 2018 Memorandum explained that
``the EPA interpreted the current NSR regulations as providing that
emissions decreases as well as increases are to be considered in
Step 1 of the NSR applicability process, where those decreases and
increases are part of a single project.'' More specifically, in the
March 2018 Memorandum the EPA interpreted the major NSR regulations
to mean that emissions increases and decreases could be considered
in Step 1 for projects that involve multiple types of emissions
units in the same manner as they are considered for projects that
only involve new or only involve existing emissions units.
\3\ An existing major stationary source triggers major NSR
permitting requirements when it undergoes a ``major modification.''
The EPA's implementing regulations for NSR establish a two-step
process for determining major NSR applicability for projects at
stationary sources. To be subject to major NSR requirements, the
project must result in both (1) a significant emissions increase
from the project (the determination of which is called ``Step 1'' of
the NSR applicability analysis); and (2) a significant net emissions
increase at the stationary source, taking account of emissions
increases and emissions decreases attributable to other projects
undertaken at the stationary source within a specific time frame
(called ``Step 2'' of the NSR applicability analysis, or
``contemporaneous netting''). For this two-step process, the NSR
regulations define what emissions rate constitutes ``significant''
for each NSR regulated pollutant. See 40 CFR 52.21(a)(2)(iv)(a); 40
CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v); 40 CFR 51.166(b)(2)(i); 40 CFR part 51,
appendix S, section II.A.5.(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 22, 2021, following promulgation of the final rule, the
EPA Administrator received a petition for reconsideration of the final
rule pursuant to CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). The petition for
reconsideration was filed by EDF, NRDC, EIP, the Sierra Club, and the
Adirondack Council. The petition for reconsideration requests that the
EPA (1) stay the effectiveness of the rule during reconsideration for
90 days; (2) conduct reconsideration proceedings and withdraw the
Project Emissions Accounting rule within the 90-day stay period; and,
(3) immediately withdraw the March 2018 Memorandum. CAA section
307(d)(7)(B) requires the EPA to convene a proceeding for
reconsideration of a rule if a party raising an objection to the rule
``can demonstrate to the Administrator that it was impracticable to
raise such objection within [the public comment period] or if the
grounds for such objection arose after the period for public comment
(but within the time specified for judicial review) and if such
objection is of central relevance to the outcome of the rule.'' The EPA
has carefully reviewed the petition for reconsideration and evaluated
all issues raised. The EPA has determined that they do not meet the CAA
section 307(d)(7)(B) criteria for mandatory reconsideration, and has
sent a letter to the petitioner denying the petition for
reconsideration and request for administrative stay of the Project
Emissions Accounting rule. The letter articulates the rationale for the
EPA's final response and is available in the docket for this action.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-22611 Filed 10-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 18, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.