Notice2021-22534
City Utilities of Springfield, Mo.-Acquisition Exemption-Line of BNSF Railway Company in Greene County, Mo.
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 15, 2021
Issuing agencies
Surface Transportation Board
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 197 (Friday, October 15, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 197 (Friday, October 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57470-57471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22534]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36543]
City Utilities of Springfield, Mo.--Acquisition Exemption--Line
of BNSF Railway Company in Greene County, Mo.
City Utilities of Springfield, Mo. (City Utilities) has filed a
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from BNSF
Railway Company approximately 1.24 miles of rail line extending from
approximately milepost 248.86 to approximately milepost 250.1, in
Greene County, Mo. (the Line).
City Utilities states that it acquired title to the Line and other
track from the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN) through deeds
dated January 15, 1986, and July 21, 1987, and that BN, and
subsequently BNSF Railway Company, provided rail operations over the
Line to deliver coal to City Utilities' James River Power Station
(JRPS) until that facility ceased burning coal in 2015.\1\ City
Utilities states that it recently discovered, as part of its due
diligence in converting the right-of-way into a multi-use recreational
trail, that it inadvertently neglected to seek acquisition authority
for the Line from the ICC when it acquired the Line from BN. City
Utilities now seeks after-the-fact Board authorization for its prior
acquisition of the Line.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ According to City Utilities, in 1983, BN abandoned a portion
of rail line that extended between milepost 250.1 and milepost 257.6
but did not remove the tracks beyond milepost 250.83. See Burlington
N. R.R.--Aban.--in Christian & Greene Cntys., Mo., AB 6 (Sub-No.
148) (ICC served July 15, 1983). City Utilities states that,
consequently, the track it acquired from BN consisted of both
abandoned track and track--i.e., the Line--that was still subject to
the jurisdiction of the Board's predecessor, the Interstate Commerce
Commission (ICC).
\2\ Citing Cattaraugus Local Development Corp.--Abandonment
Exemption--in Cattaraugus County, N.Y., AB 1300X et al. (STB served
Aug. 5, 2020), City Utilities states that it intends to seek
authorization from the Board to abandon the Line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
City Utilities certifies that there will be no rail operations over
the Line and, as such, annual revenues generated by City Utilities from
the Line will not exceed levels that would result in City Utilities
becoming a rail carrier under any of the thresholds set forth in 49 CFR
part 1201. Also, City Utilities certifies that no agreements conveying
the Line from BN to City Utilities involved any provisions that limited
future interchange with a third-party connecting carrier.
The transaction will become effective on October 30, 2021 (30 days
after the verified notice of exemption was filed).
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption
[[Page 57471]]
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.
10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke
will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption.
Petitions to stay must be filed no later than October 22, 2021 (at
least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 36543, should be filed
with the Surface Transportation Board via e-filing on the Board's
website. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on City
Utilities' representative, Thomas W. Wilcox, Law Office of Thomas W.
Wilcox, LLC, 1629 K Street NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20006.
According to City Utilities, this action is categorically excluded
from environmental review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c) and from historic
preservation reporting requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b)(1).
Board decisions and notices are available at <a href="http://www.stb.gov">www.stb.gov</a>.
Decided: October 12, 2021.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2021-22534 Filed 10-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 15, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.