Notice2021-21814
Bonneville Power Administration; Order Approving Rates on An Interim Basis and Providing Opportunity for Additional Comments
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 6, 2021
Issuing agencies
Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 191 (Wednesday, October 6, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55597-55599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21814]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EF21-3-000]
Bonneville Power Administration; Order Approving Rates on An
Interim Basis and Providing Opportunity for Additional Comments
1. In this order, we approve Bonneville Power Administration's
(Bonneville) proposed fiscal years 2022-2023 wholesale power and
transmission rates on an interim basis, pending our further review. We
also provide an additional period of time for the parties to file
comments.
I. Background
2. On July 30, 2021, as supplemented on August 2, 2021, Bonneville
filed a request for interim and final approval of its proposed
wholesale power \1\ and transmission rates \2\ in accordance with the
Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act
(Northwest Power Act) \3\ and Subpart B of Part 300 of the Commission's
regulations.\4\ Bonneville projects that the filed rates will produce
average annual power revenues of $2.774 billion and average annual
transmission revenues of $1.151 billion. Bonneville asserts that this
level of annual revenues is sufficient to recover its costs for the
2022-2023 rate approval period, while providing cash flow to assure at
least a 95% probability of making all payments to the United States
Treasury in full and on time for each year of the 2022-2023 rate
approval period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The proposed wholesale power rates for which Bonneville
seeks approval for the fiscal years 2022-2023, which is the period
October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2023, are: Priority Firm
Power Rate (PF-22); New Resource Firm Power Rate (NR-22); Industrial
Firm Power Rate (IP-22); Firm Power and Surplus Products and
Services Rate (FPS-22). Bonneville also seeks approval of related
General Rates Schedule Provisions for the same period.
\2\ The proposed transmission and ancillary services rates
(referred to collectively as transmission rates) for which
Bonneville seeks approval for the period October 1, 2021, through
September 30, 2023, are: Formula Power Transmission Rate (FPT-22.1);
Formula Power Transmission Rate (FPT-22.3); Network Integration Rate
(NT-22); Point-to-Point Rate (PTP-22); Southern Intertie Rate (IS-
22); Montana Intertie Rate (IM-22); Use-of-Facilities Transmission
Rate (UFT-22); Advance Funding Rate (AF-22); Townsend-Garrison
Transmission Rate (TGT-22); Regional Compliance Enforcement and
Regional Coordinator Rates (RC-22); Oversupply Rate (OS-22); Eastern
Intertie Rate (IE-22); and Ancillary and Control Area Services Rates
(ACS-22). Bonneville also seeks approval of related General Rates
Schedule Provisions for the same period.
\3\ 16 U.S.C. 839e(i).
\4\ 18 CFR 300.10-300.14 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. On August 12, 2021, Bonneville submitted an erratum to its July
30
[[Page 55598]]
Filing to correct certain errors in the final documents for the power
and transmission rates from the BP-22 rate proceeding (August 12
Erratum). Bonneville asserts that its corrections do not affect its
cost recovery under the 2022-2023 rate approval period or the
conclusions in its repayment studies. For power rates, Bonneville
states that it corrected an error in a summary table in the power rates
study. For transmission rates, Bonneville states that it corrected a
forecast error that affected the allocation of costs among certain
ancillary and control area services rates. Bonneville acknowledges
that, although correcting the error has resulted in a change to certain
ancillary and control area services rates in its filing, the change has
no material impact on the transmission revenue forecast. Bonneville
also states that this change in projected revenues has no material
impact on Bonneville's recovery of costs during the 2022-2023 rate
approval period or on the risk-adjusted expected value of transmission
reserves for risk at the end of fiscal years 2022 or 2023.
4. On August 26, 2021, Bonneville submitted an additional erratum
(August 26 Erratum) to its July 30 Filing to correct certain errors to
loads submitted by Portland General Electric (Portland General) that
were used to calculate Portland General's allocation of benefits under
the Residential Exchange Program (REP). According to Bonneville,
Portland General informed Bonneville on August 12, 2021, that the
exchange loads it submitted for calendar year 2020 contained erroneous
data. Bonneville reports that the error roughly doubled Portland
General's exchange load, resulting in a significant increase in
Portland General's REP benefits and a concomitant reduction to other
investor-owned utility REP participant benefits and the consumer-owned
utility REP participant's benefits. The August 26 Erratum revised power
rate schedules, a study, and study documentation to correct those
errors.
II. Notice of Filing
5. Notices of Bonneville's July 30, 2021 application and August 2,
2021 supplement were published in the Federal Register, 86 FR 43,651
(Aug. 10, 2021); 86 FR 48,132 (Aug. 27, 2021). Protests and motions to
intervene were due on or before August 30, 2021, and September 1, 2021,
respectively. Timely motions to intervene were filed by Pacific
Northwest Generating Cooperative, Avangrid Renewables, LLC, Northwest
Requirements Utilities, Public Power Council, Powerex Corp., M-S-R
Public Power Agency, and Idaho Conservation League, Great Old Broads
for Wilderness, and Idaho Rivers United (collectively, Environmental
Parties). Environmental Parties filed a protest opposing the
confirmation and approval of Bonneville's proposed power and
transmission rates for the 2022-2023 rate period. On September 7, 2021,
Bonneville filed a request for leave to answer and an answer to
Environmental Parties' protest.
6. Environmental Parties assert that Bonneville has a statutory
obligation to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected
by the federal hydropower system,\5\ and that Bonneville violated its
statutory obligation by underfunding or failing to fund much-needed
fish mitigation and enhancement projects.\6\ Further, Environmental
Parties assert that Bonneville violated the Northwest Power Act and the
Administrative Procedure Act by failing to demonstrate ``equitable
treatment'' for fish and wildlife in its final rate determination.\7\
Finally, Environmental Parties aver that Bonneville is obligated to
comply with the Administrative Procedure Act's requirement of reasoned
decision-making \8\ and that by failing to consider important aspects
of the issues before it--namely, Environmental Parties' previous
comments during Bonneville's environmental review--Bonneville
disregarded this obligation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 16 U.S.C. 839b(h)(11)(A)(i).
\6\ Envtl. Parties August 27 Protest at 1.
\7\ Id. at 2.
\8\ Id. at 11 (citing Golden Nw. Aluminum, Inc. v. Bonneville
Power Admin., 501 F.3d 1037, 1045, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. In response, Bonneville asserts that the protesters' arguments
fall outside the Commission's limited jurisdiction over Bonneville's
power and transmission rates established by section 7(a)(2) of the
Northwest Power Act.\9\ Bonneville states that Bonneville's compliance
with its environmental review and fish and wildlife protection
obligations are outside the scope of section 7(a)(2) and thus are not
within the scope of the Commission's review.\10\ Bonneville argues
that, even though it complied with section 4(h)(11)(A) of the
Administrative Procedure Act, the Commission's scope of review is
limited to section 7(a)(2) of the Northwest Power Act, which does not
extend to Bonneville's obligations under the Administrative Procedure
Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Bonneville September 7 Answer at 3 (citing 16 U.S.C.
839e(a)(2)).
\10\ Id. at 4 (citing U.S. Dep't of Energy--Bonneville Power
Admin., 32 FERC ] 61,014 (1985)).
\11\ Id. at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
A. Procedural Matters
8. Pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214 (2020), the timely, unopposed motions to
intervene serve to make the entities that filed them parties to this
proceeding.
B. Standard of Review
9. Under the Northwest Power Act, the Commission's review of
Bonneville's regional power and transmission rates is limited to
determining whether Bonneville's proposed rates meet the three specific
requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Northwest Power Act: \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 16 U.S.C. 839e(a)(2). Bonneville also must comply with the
financial, accounting, and ratemaking requirements in Department of
Energy Order No. RA 6120.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) They must be sufficient to assure repayment of the Federal
investment in the Federal Columbia River Power System over a reasonable
number of years after first meeting Bonneville's other costs;
(B) they must be based upon Bonneville's total system costs; and
(C) insofar as transmission rates are concerned, they must
equitably allocate the costs of the Federal transmission system between
Federal and non-Federal power.
10. Commission review of Bonneville's non-regional, non-firm rates
also is limited. Review is restricted to determining whether such rates
meet the requirements of section 7(k) of the Northwest Power Act,\13\
which requires that they comply with the Bonneville Project Act, the
Flood Control Act of 1944, and the Federal Columbia River Transmission
System Act. Taken together, those statutes require that Bonneville's
non-regional, non-firm rates:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Id. Sec. 839e(k).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Recover the cost of generation and transmission of such
electric energy, including the amortization of investments in the power
projects within a reasonable period;
(B) encourage the most widespread use of Bonneville power; and
(C) provide the lowest possible rates to consumers consistent with
sound business principles.
11. Unlike the Commission's statutory authority under the Federal
Power Act, the Commission's authority under sections 7(a) and 7(k) of
the Northwest Power Act does not include the power to modify the rates.
The responsibility for developing rates in the first instance is vested
with Bonneville's Administrator. The rates are then
[[Page 55599]]
submitted to the Commission for approval or disapproval. In this
regard, the Commission's role can be viewed as an appellate one: to
affirm or remand the rates submitted to it for review.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See, e.g., U.S. Dept. of Energy--Bonneville Power Admin.,
67 FERC ] 61,351, at 62,216-17 (1994); Aluminum Co. of Am. v.
Bonneville Power Admin., 903 F.2d 585, 592-93 (9th Cir. 1989).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Moreover, review at this interim stage is further limited. In
view of the volume and complexity of a Bonneville rate application,
such as the one now before the Commission in this filing, and the
limited period in advance of the requested effective date in which to
review the application,\15\ the Commission generally defers resolution
of issues on the merits of Bonneville's application until the order on
final confirmation. Thus, the proposed rates, if not patently
deficient, generally are approved on an interim basis and the parties
are afforded an additional opportunity in which to raise issues with
regard to Bonneville's filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See 18 CFR 300.10(a)(3)(ii).
\16\ See, e.g., U.S. Dept. of Energy--Bonneville Power Admin.,
168 FERC ] 62,178, at 4 (2019); U.S. Dept. of Energy--Bonneville
Power Admin., 160 FERC ] 61,113, at P 6 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. The Commission declines at this time to grant final
confirmation and approval of Bonneville's proposed wholesale power and
transmission rates. The Commission's preliminary review nevertheless
indicates that Bonneville's wholesale power and transmission rates
filing appears to meet the statutory standards and the minimum
threshold filing requirements of Part 300 of the Commission's
regulations.\17\ Moreover, the Commission's preliminary review of
Bonneville's submittal indicates that it does not contain any patent
deficiencies. The proposed rates therefore will be approved on an
interim basis pending full review for final approval. We note, as well,
that no one will be harmed by this decision because interim approval
allows Bonneville's rates to go into effect subject to refund with
interest; the Commission may order refunds with interest if the
Commission later determines in its final decision not to approve the
rates.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See, e.g., U.S. Dept. of Energy--Bonneville Power Admin.,
168 FERC ] 62,178 at P 4; U.S. Dept. of Energy--Bonneville Power
Admin., 160 FERC ] 61,113 at P 13.
\18\ 18 CFR 300.20(c) (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. In addition, we will provide an additional period of time for
parties to file comments and reply comments on issues related to final
confirmation and approval of Bonneville's proposed rates. This will
ensure that the record in this proceeding is complete and fully
developed.
The Commission orders:
(A) Interim approval of Bonneville's proposed wholesale power and
transmission rates is hereby granted, to become effective on October 1,
2021, through September 30, 2023, subject to refund with interest as
set forth in section 300.20(c) of the Commission's regulations,\19\
pending final action and either their approval or disapproval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Within 30 days of the date of this order, parties who wish to
do so may file additional comments regarding final confirmation and
approval of Bonneville's proposed rates. Parties who wish to do so may
file reply comments within 20 days thereafter.
(C) The Secretary shall promptly publish this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Issued: September 30, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-21814 Filed 10-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 6, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.