Safety Zone; Explosives arc at Military Ocean Terminal Concord, Suisun Bay, Concord, CA
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the navigable waters of the Suisun Bay, off Concord, CA, in support of explosive off and on-loading to Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO). This safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential explosion within the explosive arc. Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port San Francisco or a designated representative.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50998-51000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0732]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Explosives arc at Military Ocean Terminal Concord,
Suisun Bay, Concord, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of the Suisun Bay, off Concord, CA, in support of
explosive off and on-loading to Military Ocean Terminal Concord
(MOTCO). This safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from potential explosion within the
explosive arc. Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone
without the permission of the Captain of the Port San Francisco or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from September 14,
2021 through 11:59 p.m. September 18, 2021. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from September 13, 2021 until
September 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-
2021-0732 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade William Harris, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (415) 399-7443, email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82d1c4d5e3f6e7f0f5e3fbf1c2f7f1e1e5acefebee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3e0f5e4d2c7d6c1c4d2cac0f3c6c0d0d49ddedadf">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impractical. The Coast Guard
received the initial report of larger explosives arc on September 8,
2021. It is impractical to go through the full notice and comment rule
making process because the Coast Guard must establish this temporary
safety zone by September 13, 2021 and lacks sufficient time to provide
a reasonable comment period and to consider those comments before
issuing the rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public interest because immediate action
is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters around the potentially hazardous explosive off and
on-loading.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port San
Francisco (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with
the explosive off and on-loading will exist between September 13, 2021
and September 18, 2021. There will be a safety concern for anyone
within a 4,500-foot radius of the explosive off and on-load. For this
reason, this temporary safety zone is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters surrounding
the potentially hazardous off and on-loading operations.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary safety zone in the navigable
waters around the explosives off and on-loading occurring at MOTCO off
Concord, CA for a five-day cargo operation period conducted between
September 13, 2021 and September 18, 2021. The temporary safety zone
will encompass the navigable waters of Suisun Bay, from surface to
bottom, within a circle formed by connecting all points 4,500 feet out
from the location of the explosive material at approximate position
38[deg]3.54'' N, 122[deg]0.82'' W or as announced via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners. The projected explosive arc presents the need for a 4,500
foot radius, which is larger than the safety zone already established
in 33 CFR 165.1198.
This regulation is necessary to keep persons and vessels away from
the immediate vicinity of the explosive materials during cargo
operations, and to ensure the safety of personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment. Except for persons or vessels authorized by the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the restricted area. A ``designated representative''
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel or a
Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the COTP in
the enforcement of the safety zone.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the limited
duration and narrowly tailored geographic area of the safety zone.
Although this rule restricts access to the water encompassed by the
safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant because
the local waterways users will be notified to ensure the safety zone
will result in minimum impact. The vessels desiring to transit through
or around the temporary safety zone may do so upon express permission
from the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
[[Page 50999]]
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section V.A. above, this rule rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone in the navigable waters around the explosives off
and on-loading occurring at Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO),
off Concord, CA. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on
locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-066 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-066 Safety Zone; Explosive arc at Military Ocean
Terminal Concord, Suisun Bay, Concord, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of Suisun Bay, from surface to bottom, within a circle formed by
connecting all points 4,500 feet out from the location of the explosive
material at approximate position 38[deg]3.54'' N, 122[deg]0.82'' W or
as announced via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative. Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the
safety zone on VHF-23A or through
[[Page 51000]]
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from
September 13, 2021 at 12:01 a.m. until September 18, 2021 at 11:59 p.m.
or as announced via marine information broadcast.
(e) Information broadcasts. The COTP or the COTP's designated
representative will notify the maritime community of periods during
which this zone will be enforced in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
Dated: September 9, 2021.
Jordan M. Baldueza,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate Captain of the Port, Sector San
Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2021-19901 Filed 9-10-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.