Notice2021-19730
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend its Price List
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
September 14, 2021
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51201-51203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19730]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-92898; File No. SR-NYSE-2021-49]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend its Price List
September 8, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on August 31, 2021, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to eliminate the (1)
underutilized monthly rebate payable to Designated Market Makers
(``DMM'') with 750 or fewer assigned securities in the previous month,
and (2) underutilized Supplemental Liquidity Provider (``SLP'') Tier 5.
The Exchange proposes to implement the rule change on September 1,
2021. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website
at <a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a>, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to eliminate the (1)
underutilized monthly rebate payable to Designated Market Makers
(``DMM'') with 750 or fewer assigned securities in the previous month,
and (2) underutilized SLP Tier 5.
The Exchange proposes to implement the rule change on September 1,
2021.
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to eliminate an underutilized DMM rebate and
an underutilized adding tier for SLPs, as follows.
Underutilized DMM Rebate
Currently, the Exchange offers an additional per share credit to
DMMs in each eligible assigned More Active Security with a stock price
of at least $1.00 on current rebates of $0.0034 or less, i.e., adding
credits of $0.0015, $0.0027, $0.0031, and $0.0034 per share.
Specifically, DMMs are eligible for an incremental rebate $0.0002 per
share in each eligible assigned More
[[Page 51202]]
Active Security with a stock price of at least $1.00 where NYSE CADV is
equal to or greater than 4.0 billion shares, when adding liquidity with
orders, other than Mid-Point Liquidity (``MPL'') Orders, in such
securities and the DMM either:
1. Has providing liquidity in all assigned securities as a
percentage of NYSE CADV that is an increase of 0.30% more than the
DMM's April 2020 providing liquidity in all assigned securities as a
percentage of NYSE CADV, or
2. has providing liquidity in all assigned securities as a
percentage of NYSE CADV that is an increase of at least 40% more than
the DMM's April 2020 providing liquidity in all assigned securities as
a percentage of NYSE CADV for DMMs with 750 or fewer assigned
securities in the previous month.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate the second alternative way to
qualify for the incremental rebate in its entirety and to remove it
from the Price List. The second qualification method has been
underutilized by member organizations insofar as no DMMs with 750 or
fewer assigned securities has qualified for the incremental rebate in
the past six months. As such, Exchange does not anticipate any member
organization in the near future would qualify for the rebate that is
the subject of this proposed rule change.
Underutilized SLP Tier 5
Under current SLP Tier 5, an SLP adding liquidity in securities
with a per share price of $1.00 or more with orders, other than MPL
Orders, is eligible for a per share credit of $0.0031 (or $0.0012 if a
Non-Displayed Reserve Order) if the SLP: (1) Meets the 10% average or
more quoting requirement in an assigned security pursuant to Rule 107B;
(2) adds liquidity for all assigned SLP securities in the aggregate
(including shares of both an SLP-Prop and an SLMM of the same or an
affiliated member organization) of an average daily volume (``ADV'') of
more than 0.60%% of Tape A consolidated ADV (``CADV'') \4\ (for SLPs
that are also DMMs and subject to Rule 107B(i)(2)(A), more than 0.60%
after a discount of the percentage for the prior quarter of Tape A CADV
in DMM assigned securities as of the last business day of the prior
month); (3) has Adding ADV,\5\ including non-SLP Adding ADV but
excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, that is at least 0.80% of Tape
A CADV; and (4) executes an ADV, including non-SLP Adding ADV but
excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, of at least 250,000 shares in
Retail Price Improvements Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The terms ``ADV'' and ``CADV'' are defined in footnote * of
the Price List.
\5\ Footnote 2 to the Price List defines ``Adding ADV'' as ADV
that adds liquidity to the Exchange during the billing month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to eliminate SLP Tier 5 in its entirety and
to remove it from the Price List. The tier has been underutilized by
member organizations insofar as no SLP has qualified for the tiered
display or tiered non-display credit in the past two months. As such,
Exchange does not anticipate any member organization in the near future
would qualify for the rebate that is the subject of this proposed rule
change. As a result of the deletion of SLP Tier 5, the Exchange would
renumber the remaining SLP tiers as follows. Current SLP Tier 1A would
become new SLP Tier 2. Current SLP Tier 2 would become new SLP Tier 3.
Current SLP Tier 3 would become new SLP Tier 4. Finally, current SLP
Tier 4 would become new SLP Tier 5.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Change Is Reasonable
The Exchange believes that the proposed elimination of the
incremental rebate for DMMs with 750 or fewer assigned securities is
reasonable because DMMs have underutilized the alternative
qualification for this incentive. No DMM has qualified for the rebate
in the past six months. The Exchange does not anticipate any member
organization in the near future qualifying for the rebate that is the
subject of this proposed rule change. Similarly, the Exchange believes
that the proposed elimination of SLP Tier 5 is reasonable. No SLP has
qualified for the rebate in the past two months, and the Exchange does
not anticipate any member organization in the near future qualifying
for SLP Tier 5. The Exchange believes it is reasonable to eliminate
rebates and credits when such incentives become underutilized. The
Exchange also believes eliminating underutilized incentive programs
would also simplify the Price List. The Exchange further believes that
removing the alternative qualification for the incremental DMM rebate
and SLP Tier 5 from the Price List, as well as renumbering the
remaining SLP tiers, would add clarity and transparency to the Price
List.
The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees
The Exchange believes the proposal equitably allocates fees among
its market participants because the underutilized alternative
qualification for a DMM rebate and SLP tier the Exchange proposes to
eliminate would be eliminated in their entirety, and would no longer be
available to any member organization in any form. Similarly, the
Exchange believes the proposal equitably allocates fees among its
market participants because elimination of the underutilized rebate and
credits would apply to all similarly-situated member organizations on
an equal basis. All such member organizations would continue to be
subject to the same fee structure, and access to the Exchange's market
would continue to be offered on fair and nondiscriminatory terms.
The Proposal Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory. The proposal is not unfairly discriminatory because it
neither targets nor will it have a disparate impact on any particular
category of market participant. The Exchange believes that the proposal
is not unfairly discriminatory because the proposed elimination of the
alternative qualification for the incremental DMM rebate and SLP Tier 5
credits would affect all similarly-situated market participants on an
equal and non-discriminatory basis. The Exchange believes that
eliminating rebates and credits that are underutilized and ineffective
would no longer be available to any DMM or SLP, respectively, on an
equal basis. The Exchange also believes that the proposed change would
protect investors and the public interest because the deletion of
underutilized fees would make the Price List more accessible and
transparent and facilitate market participants' understanding of the
fees charged for services currently offered by the Exchange.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
[[Page 51203]]
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\8\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the proposal relates
solely to elimination of an underutilized DMM rebate and SLP tiered
credits and, as such, would not have any impact on intra- or inter-
market competition because the proposed change is solely designed to
accurately reflect the services that the Exchange currently offers,
thereby adding clarity to the Price List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \9\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \10\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \11\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aad8dfc6cf87c9c5c7c7cfc4ded9ead9cfc984cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0b2b5aca5eda3afadada5aeb4b380b3a5a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2021-49 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2021-49. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2021-49 and should be submitted on
or before October 5, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19730 Filed 9-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on September 14, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.