Notice2021-19529
Carolinas Clean Energy Business Association v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Duke Energy Progress, LLC; Notice of Withdrawal
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
September 10, 2021
Issuing agencies
Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 50713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19529]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL21-92-000]
Carolinas Clean Energy Business Association v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. and Duke Energy Progress, LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal
September 3, 2021.
On August 25, 2021, pursuant to Rule 216 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure,\1\ the Carolinas Clean Energy Business
Association (CCEBA) filed a motion to withdraw its complaint against
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) and Duke Energy Progress, LLC (DEP),
requesting expedited treatment of the motion to withdraw. On August 31,
2021, the Commission issued a notice shortening the comment period on
the motion to withdraw to September 2, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 18 CFR 385.216(b) (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCEBA states that PJM and DEP have committed to work with CCEBA to
consider the issues raised in the complaint through settlement and to
file any resulting amendments to PJM and DEP's joint operating
agreement with the Commission under section 205 of the Federal Power
Act no later than mid-December 2021.\2\ CCEBA further states that such
settlement will most expeditiously resolve the issues identified in the
complaint, making withdrawal preferable. CCEBA asserts that its
withdrawal is without prejudice to CCEBA's right to re-file the
complaint. CCEBA also states that PJM and DEP have authorized CCEBA to
state that they do not oppose withdrawal of the complaint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ CCEBA Motion to Withdraw at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that CCEBA's requested
motion to withdraw is granted, effective as of the date of this notice.
Dated: September 3, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19529 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on September 10, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.