Proposed Rule2021-18467
Anchorage Regulations; Mississippi River, Mile Markers 12 to 85 Above Head of Passes
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 30, 2021
Issuing agencies
Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
Abstract
The Coast Guard proposes to amend anchorage regulations for the Lower Mississippi River (LMR) between mile markers (MM) 12 and 85 Above Head of Passes (AHP). This action would modify nine anchorages and establish one new anchorage grounds. The rule would increase the available anchorage areas necessary to accommodate vessel traffic, promote navigational safety, provide for the overall safe and efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce, and bolster the economy through increased anchorage capacity. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 165 (Monday, August 30, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 165 (Monday, August 30, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48354-48357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18467]
[[Page 48354]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG-2020-0154]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations; Mississippi River, Mile Markers 12 to 85
Above Head of Passes
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend anchorage regulations for
the Lower Mississippi River (LMR) between mile markers (MM) 12 and 85
Above Head of Passes (AHP). This action would modify nine anchorages
and establish one new anchorage grounds. The rule would increase the
available anchorage areas necessary to accommodate vessel traffic,
promote navigational safety, provide for the overall safe and efficient
flow of vessel traffic and commerce, and bolster the economy through
increased anchorage capacity. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2020-0154 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander Thao Nguyen,
Sector New Orleans, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504-365-2231, email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37635f56581961197950424e52597742445450195a5e5b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a3e020b05443c44240d1f130f042a1f19090d44070306">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
AHP Above Head of Passes
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans
CPRA Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
CRPPA Crescent River Port Pilots' Association
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LDB Left Descending Bank
LMR Lower Mississippi River
MM Mile Marker
MNSA Maritime Navigation Safety Association
NOI Notice of Inquiry
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
RDB Right Descending Bank
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The legal basis and authorities for this notice of proposed
rulemaking are found in 46 U.S.C. 70006, 33 CFR 109.05, 33 CFR 1.05-1,
and DHS Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to propose, establish, and define regulatory anchorage grounds.
Under Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Sec. 109.05,
U.S. Coast Guard District Commanders are delegated the authority to
establish anchorage grounds by the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard.
The Coast Guard established Anchorage Grounds under Title 33 CFR
110.1(b), Subpart B (32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by 52 FR
33811, Sept. 8, 1987; 63 FR 5526, June 30, 1998).
The Coast Guard proposes to amend nine existing anchorage grounds;
Boothville Anchorage (33 CFR 110.195(a)(4)), Magnolia Anchorage (33 CFR
110.195(a)(7)), Davant Anchorage (33 CFR 110.195(a)(9)), Wills Point
Anchorage (33 CFR 110.195(a)(11)), Cedar Grove Anchorage (33 CFR
110.195(a)(12)), Belle Chasse Anchorage (33 CFR 110.195(a)(13)), Lower
12 Mile Point Anchorage (33 CFR 110.195(a)(14)), Lower 9 Mile Anchorage
(33 CFR 110.195(a)(15)), Point Michel Anchorage (33 CFR
110.195(a)(35)), and to establish one new anchorage grounds--Phoenix
Anchorage at 33 CFR 110.195(a)(37).
The project to modify or establish multiple anchorage grounds along
the LMR was initiated in 2019. From 2019 through 2021, certain port
stakeholders, (including Crescent River Port Pilots' Association
(CRPPA), Maritime Navigation Safety Association (MNSA), Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA) and United States Coast
Guard (USCG)) worked to determine if the proposed modifications were
necessary and in suitable locations with consideration given to, among
other things, environmental factors.
The Coast Guard published a Notice of Inquiry (NOI), 85 FR 61671,
on September 30, 2020. The NOI solicited comments from maritime
stakeholders on the proposal to amend ten existing anchorage grounds
and to establish two new anchorage grounds. At the end of the comment
period, ending on November 30, 2020, we received a total of nine
comments. The Coast Guard addresses the comments below.
Seven of the nine comments supported the proposed modifications of
existing or establishment of new anchorage grounds along the Lower
Mississippi River (LMR); one comment opposed several of the proposed
modifications of existing or establishment of new anchorage grounds
along the LMR (detailed below), and one comment was outside of the
scope of the NOI as it related to change in presidency.
One commenter objected to the following modifications/new
anchorages:
(1) 0.6 miles establishment of Phoenix Anchorage located at Mile
Marker (MM) 57.82-58.42. The justification provided was that the
anchorage could conflict with a borrow source identified for marsh
restoration.
The Coast Guard does not agree with this objection. Operations
routinely occur along the Mississippi River in and around anchorage
grounds and impacts to navigation and work-sites, such as the borrow
site, are minimal.
(2) 0.3 miles expansion of Davant Anchorage located at MM 52.8-
53.9. The justification was that the anchorage could conflict with a
borrow source identified for marsh restoration.
The Coast Guard does not agree with this objection. Operations
routinely occur along the Mississippi River in and around anchorage
grounds and impacts to navigation and work-sites, such as the borrow
site, are minimal.
(3) 0.1 miles expansion of Magnolia Anchorage located at MM 45.5-
47.6. The justification was that the anchorage could conflict with a
borrow source identified for marsh restoration.
The Coast Guard does not agree with this objection. Operations
routinely occur along the Mississippi River in and around anchorage
grounds and impacts to navigation and work-sites, such as the borrow
site, are minimal.
(4) 0.95 miles expansion of Boothville Anchorage located at MM
13.0-18.5. The justification was that the anchorage could conflict with
a borrow source identified for marsh restoration.
The Coast Guard does not agree with this objection. Operations
routinely occur along the Mississippi River in and around anchorage
grounds and impacts to navigation and work-sites, such as the borrow
site, are minimal.
(5) 0.2 miles expansion of Alliance Anchorage located at MM 63.8-
65.8. The justification was that the anchorage could conflict with a
borrow source identified for marsh restoration.
The Coast Guard does not agree with this objection. Operations
routinely
[[Page 48355]]
occur along the Mississippi River in and around anchorage grounds and
impacts to navigation and work-sites, such as the borrow site, are
minimal.
(6) 0.2 miles shift upriver and 0.15 miles expansion of Wills Point
Anchorage currently located at MM 66.5-67.6. The proposed location
would be MM 66.7-67.9. The provided justification was twofold. First,
the shift upriver would directly overlap with the footprint of the Mid-
Breton Sediment Diversion intake structure located at MM 68 that is
intended to convey sediment, fresh water, and nutrients from the
Mississippi River into Mid-Breton Sound Basin to reduce coastal land
loss and sustain surrounding wetlands. Second, the anchorage could
conflict with a borrow source for marsh restoration.
The Coast Guard agrees that the proposed shift upriver and
expansion of the anchorage could pose negative impacts to the Mid-
Breton sediment Diversion intake structure. The Coast Guard does not
agree with second part of the objection. Operations routinely occur
along the Mississippi River in and around anchorage grounds and impacts
to navigation and work-sites, such as the borrow site, are minimal.
(7) 0.5 miles establishment of Bertrandville Anchorage located at
MM 68.5-69.0. The justification was that the anchorage, being directly
upriver of the Mid-Breton Sediment Diversion intake structure, would
obstruct the intake flowline and could pose a navigational safety
concern.
The Coast Guard agrees that the proposed establishment of an
anchorage grounds at this location could pose negative impacts to the
Mid-Breton sediment Diversion intake structure.
Note: The following anchorages were mentioned in the opposition
comment but are not locations that are being considered for amendment
by this rulemaking at this time: Myrtle Grove anchorage and Point
Celeste Anchorage.
In March 2021, two additional comments were received from
stakeholders. Although these comments were received outside of the NOI
comment period, the Coast Guard chose to consider them. In one new
comment, the commenter that submitted the opposing comments above
withdrew their opposing comments on items 1-4 listed above (Phoenix,
Davant, Magnolia, and Boothville Anchorages), but maintained the
objections raised in items 5-7 to the expansions of Wills Point
Anchorage and Alliance Anchorage and the establishment of Bertrandville
Anchorage. The second new comment proposed to remove the establishment
of Bertrandville Anchorage from consideration to expand Wills Point
Anchorage from MM 66.5-67.9 and decrease the width of the anchorage to
500 feet.
After considering the stakeholder comments, the Coast Guard has
decided that: (1) The width reduction at Wills Point Anchorage will be
added to this proposed rulemaking, (2) the length expansions and shift
at Wills Point Anchorage and the length expansion at Alliance Anchorage
would not be further pursued at this time, and (3) the establishment of
a new anchorage ground at Bertrandville would not be further pursued at
this time.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to improve navigational
safety, providing for the overall safe and efficient flow of vessel
traffic and commerce, and bolster the economy through increased
anchorage capacity, thus streamlining vessel throughput and increasing
ship to port interactions.
The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70006.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Commander of Coast Guard District Eight proposes to establish
one new anchorage ground and amend nine existing anchorage grounds
along the LMR, ranging from MM 12 to MM 85 AHP. There are not currently
adequate anchorage grounds along the river system to facilitate the
safe anchorage of shallow and deep draft vessels along the LMR. This
proposed action would ensure the safety and efficiency of navigation of
vessels transiting in and out of the LMR. The specific anchorage
boundaries are described in detail in the proposed regulatory text at
the end of the document. In general, this proposed rule will have the
following effects:
1. Increase the length of the Boothville Anchorage from 5.5 miles
to 6.45 miles (33 CFR 110.195(a)(4)).
2. Increase the length of the Magnolia Anchorage from 2.1 miles to
2.2 miles (33 CFR 110.195(a)(7)).
3. Increase the lengh of the Davant Anchorage from 1.1 miles to 1.4
miles (33 CFR 110.195(a)(9)).
4. Decrease the width of the Wills Point Anchorage from 600 feet to
500 feet (33 CFR 110.195(a)(11)).
5. Add a note to the text of the Cedar Grove Anchorage (33 CFR
110.195(a)(12)).
6. Increase the length of the Belle Chasse Anchorage from 2.1 miles
to 2.15 miles, and decrease the width from 575 feet to 500 feet (33 CFR
110.195(a)(13)).
7. Add a Note to the text of the Lower 12 Mile Anchorage (33 CFR
110.195(a)(14)).
8. Increase the length of the Lower 9 Mile Anchorage from 2.3 miles
to 2.4 miles (33 CFR 110.195(a)(15)).
9. Increase the length of the Point Michel Anchorage from 1.4 miles
to 2.2 miles (33 CFR 110.195(a)(35)).
10. Add a new anchorage, the Phoenix Anchorage, to include the
area, 0.6 miles in length, along the left descending bank of the river
extending from mile 57.82 to mile 58.42 Above Head of Passes. The width
of the anchorage is 400 feet. The inner boundary of the anchorage is a
line parallel to the nearest bank 400 feet from the water's edge into
the river as measured from the LWRP. The outer boundary of the
anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest bank 800 feet from the
water's edge into the river as measured from the LWRP.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This proposed regulatory action is based on minimal impact to
routine navigation. The proposed anchorage areas would not restrict
traffic as they are located well outside the established navigation
channel. Vessels would still be able to maneuver in, around and through
the anchorages.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 48356]]
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
anchorage grounds may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of one new anchorage grounds and the modification of nine
existing anchorage grounds along the LMR. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. If your material cannot be
submitted using <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, call or email the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and public comments, will be in our online docket at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. We review all comments received, but we will only post
comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we
receive. If you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts,
you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is
published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE GROUNDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C 2071, 46 U.S.C. 70006, 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 110.195 by revising paragraphs (a)(4), (7), (9), (11)
through (15), and 35, and adding paragraph (a)(37) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.195 Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA, including South
and Southwest Passes.
(a) * * *
(4) Boothville Anchorage. An area, 6.45 miles in length, along the
right descending bank of the river extending from mile 12.05 to mile
18.5 Above Head of Passes. The width of the
[[Page 48357]]
anchorage is 750 feet. The inner boundary of the anchorage is a line
parallel to the nearest bank 250 feet from the water's edge into the
river as measured from the LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is
a line parallel to the nearest bank 1,000 feet from the water's edge
into the river as measured from the LWRP.
* * * * *
(7) Magnolia Anchorage. An area, 2.2 miles in length, along the
right descending bank of the river extending from mile 45.4 to mile
47.6 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 700 feet. The
inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest bank
400 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 1,100 feet from the water's edge into the river as
measured from the LWRP.
* * * * *
(9) Davant Anchorage. An area, 1.4 miles in length, along the left
descending bank of the river extending from mile 52.5 to mile 53.9
Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 800 feet.
* * * * *
(11) Wills Point Anchorage. An area, 1.1 miles in length, along the
left descending bank of the river extending from mile 66.5 to mile 67.6
Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 500 feet. The inner
boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest bank 200
feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the LWRP.
The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest
bank 700 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP.
(12) Cedar Grove Anchorage. An area, 1.34 miles in length, along
the right descending bank of the river extending from mile 69.56 to
mile 70.9 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 500 feet.
The inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest
bank 200 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 700 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP.
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(12): Jesuit Bend Revetment extends/runs
adjacent to the lower portion of this anchorage. Mariners are urged
to use caution in this anchorage.
(13) Belle Chasse Anchorage. An area, 2.15 miles in length, along
the right descending bank of the river extending from mile 73.05 to
mile 75.2 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 500 feet.
The inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest
bank 375 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 875 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP.
(14) Lower 12 Mile Point Anchorage. An area, 2.2 miles in length,
along the right descending bank of the river extending from mile 78.6
to mile 80.8 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 500
feet. The inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 300 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel
to the nearest bank 800 feet from the water's edge into the river as
measured from the LWRP.
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(14): English Turn Revetment extends/
runs adjacent to the lower portion of this anchorage. Mariners are
urged to use caution in this anchorage.
(15) Lower 9 Mile Anchorage. An area, 2.4 miles in length, along
the right descending bank of the river extending from mile 82.6 to mile
85.0 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 500 feet. The
inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest bank
300 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 800 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP.
* * * * *
(35) Point Michel Anchorage. An area, 2.2 miles in length, along
the right descending bank of the river extending from mile 40.0 to mile
42.2 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 500 feet. The
inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest bank
325 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 825 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP.
* * * * *
(37) Phoenix Anchorage. An area, 0.6 miles in length, along the
left descending bank of the river extending from mile 57.82 to mile
58.42 Above Head of Passes. The width of the anchorage is 400 feet. The
inner boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the nearest bank
400 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured from the
LWRP. The outer boundary of the anchorage is a line parallel to the
nearest bank 800 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP.
* * * * *
Dated: August 19, 2021.
Richard V. Timme,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard District Eight.
[FR Doc. 2021-18467 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 30, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.