Notice2021-18367
Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 26, 2021
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that exporters/producers of stainless steel flanges from India made sales at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) March 28, 2018, through September 30, 2019.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 163 (Thursday, August 26, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 163 (Thursday, August 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47619-47621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18367]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-877]
Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
exporters/producers of stainless steel flanges from India made sales at
prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) March 28,
2018, through September 30, 2019.
DATES: Applicable August 26, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benito Ballesteros, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7425.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 24, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary
Results.\1\ On April 2, 2021, we received timely-filed case briefs from
Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited (Bebitz) \2\ Chandan Steel Limited
(Chandan),\3\ and Pradeep Metals Limited,\4\ and a joint brief from
Balkrishna et al. and Bebitz.\5\ On April 9, 2021, the petitioner
timely filed its rebuttal brief.\6\ On May 11, 2021, Commerce held a
public hearing, limited to the issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs.\7\ On June 2, 2021, we extended the deadline for the final
results of this review until August 20, 2021.\8\ For a complete
description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 86 FR 11233
(February 24, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Bebitz's Letter, ``Stainless Steel Flanges from India:
Case Brief,'' dated April 2, 2021.
\3\ On April 30, 2021, we rejected Chandan's case brief for
relying on untimely-filed new factual information (NFI). See
Commerce Letter, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Rejection of New Factual
Information,'' dated April 30, 2021. Therefore, on May 4, 2021,
Chandan refiled its case brief after removing the NFI. See Chandan's
Letter, ``Certain Stainless Steel Flanges from India (A-533-877--
AR1), Submission of Case Brief for Chandan Steel (Refile),'' dated
May 4, 2021.
\4\ See Pradeep Metals' Letter, ``Certain Stainless Steel
Flanges from India (A-533-877--AR1), Submission of Case Brief for
Pradeep Metals Limited,'' dated April 2, 2021.
\5\ See Balkrishna et al./Bebitz's Letter, ``Stainless Steel
Flanges from India: `All Other' Case Brief,'' dated April 2, 2021.
\6\ On July 19, 2021, we rejected the petitioner's rebuttal
brief for containing citations to untimely-filed NFI submitted by
Chandan. See Commerce's Letter, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Rejection of
Petitioner's Rebuttal Brief,'' dated July 19, 2021. On July 21,
2021, the petitioner refiled its rebuttal brief after removing the
NFI. See Petitioner's Letter, ``Stainless Steel Flanges from India:
Resubmission of Petitioner's Rebuttal Brief,'' dated July 21, 2021.
\7\ See Hearing Transcript, ``The Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Public
Hearing,'' dated May 11, 2021.
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Stainless Steel Flanges from India:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018-2019,'' dated June 2, 2021.
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019,'' dated August 20, 2021
(Issues and Decision Memorandum) which is dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is stainless steel flanges
from India. For a complete description of the scope of this order, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
We addressed all issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Attached to this notice, in
Appendix I, is a list of the issues which parties raised. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at <a href="http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html/">http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html/</a>.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and comments received from
interested parties, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit's decision in Albemarle,\12\ Commerce continues to assign to
the companies not individually examined (see Appendix II for a full
list of these companies) a margin of 145.25 percent, which is the
dumping margin assigned to mandatory respondent Chandan. Commerce has
addressed arguments from various interested parties regarding this
rate, which we assigned to the non-examined companies in the
Preliminary Results, and, for the final results, the determination
remains unchanged, as discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Preliminary Results (citing Albemarle Corp. v. United
States, 821 F. 3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle)).
\13\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Administrative Review
We are assigning the following dumping margin to the firms listed
below for the POR, March 28, 2018, through September 30, 2019:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash deposit rate
Dumping margin (adjusted for
Exporter/producer (percent) subsidy offsets)
(percent) 14
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandan Steel Limited............. 145.25 140.38
Companies Not Individually 145.25 140.38
Examined (excluding Bebitz
Flanges Works Private Limited) 15
[[Page 47620]]
Bebitz Flanges Works Private 145.25 145.25
Limited 16.......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
Critical Circumstance Determination, 83 FR 40745 (August 16, 2018).
\15\ See Appendix II.
\16\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Normally, Commerce discloses the calculations performed in its
analysis to parties in a review within five days of the date of
publication of the notice of final results, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). However, because Commerce applied a rate based on total AFA
to the mandatory respondent in this review, in accordance with section
776 of the Act, there are no calculations to disclose.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has determined, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. We intend to
issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the final results of this review
in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court
of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not
to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a
request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the final results, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem
assessment rate equal to the dumping margins shown above to all entries
of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or
exported by Chandan or exported by the companies which were not
selected for individual examination. We intend to instruct CBP to take
into account the ``provisional measures deposit cap,'' in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(d).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of the final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Chandan and the companies not individually examined
will be equal to the rates established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered by this review but covered by a prior segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered by this review or
the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 14.29 percent,\18\ the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Antidumping Duty
Order, 83 FR 50639 (October 9, 2018) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: August 20, 2021.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of AFA to Chandan
Comment 2: Selection of the AFA Rate
Comment 3: All-Others Rate for Non-Examined Companies
Comment 4: Export Subsidies Offset
V. Recommendation
Appendix II--List of Non-Examined Companies
1. Arien Global
2. Armstrong International Pvt. Ltd
3. Avinimetal
4. Balkrishna Steel Forge Pvt. Ltd
5. Bebitz Flanges Works Private Limited
6. Bee Gee Enterprises
7. Bsl Freight Solutions Pvt., Ltd
8. CD Industries (Prop. Kisaan Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd)
9. Cipriani Harrison Valves Pvt. Ltd
10. CTL Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd
11. Echjay Forgings Private Ltd \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ In the Initiation Notice, this company also appeared as
``Echjay Forgings Private Limited.'' See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 67712, 67714
(December 11, 2019) (Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Fivebros Forgings Pvt. Ltd
13. Fluid Controls Pvt. Ltd
14. Geodis Oversea Pvt., Ltd
15. Globelink WW India Pvt., Ltd
16. Goodluck India Ltd
17. Hilton Metal Forging Limited
18. Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd
19. JAY JAGDAMBA FORGINGS PRIVATE LIMITED
20. JAY JAGDAMBA LIMITED \20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In the Initiation Notice, this company also appeared as
``Jay Jagdamba Ltd.'' Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. JAY JAGDAMBA PROFILE PRIVATE LIMITED
[[Page 47621]]
22. Kisaan Die Tech
23. Kunj Forgings Pvt. Ltd
24. Montane Shipping Pvt., Ltd
25. Noble Shipping Pvt. Ltd
26. Paramount Forge
27. Pashupati Tradex Pvt., Ltd
28. Peekay Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd
29. Pradeep Metals Ltd
30. R D Forge Pvt., Ltd
31. Rolex Fittings India Pvt. Ltd
32. Rollwell Forge Pvt. Ltd
33. Safewater Lines (I) Pvt. Ltd
34. Saini Flange Pvt. Ltd
35. SAR Transport Systems
36. Shilpan Steelcast Pvt. Ltd
37. Shree Jay Jagdamba Flanges Pvt. Ltd
38. Teamglobal Logistics Pvt. Ltd
39. Technical Products Corporation
40. Technocraft Industries India Ltd
41. Transworld Global
42. VEEYES Engineering Pvt. Ltd
43. Vishal Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd
44. Yusen Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd
[FR Doc. 2021-18367 Filed 8-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 26, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.