Notice2021-18123
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 13.15, Which Governs the Exchange's Minor Rule Violation Plan
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 24, 2021
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 161 (Tuesday, August 24, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47346-47350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18123]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-92702; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-045]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Rule 13.15, Which Governs the Exchange's Minor Rule
Violation Plan
August 18, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 3, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change
as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and
approving the proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend Rule 13.15, which governs the Exchange's Minor Rule Violation
Plan (``MRVP''), in connection with certain minor rule violations,
applicable fines, as well as other clarifying, nonsubstantive changes.
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (<a href="http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx">http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx</a>), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its MRVP in Rule 13.15 in connection
with certain minor rule violations, applicable fines, as well as other
clarifying, nonsubstantive changes. Rule 13.15 provides for disposition
of specific violations through assessment of fines in lieu of
conducting a formal disciplinary proceeding. Rule 13.15(g) sets forth
the list of specific Exchange Rules under which a Trading Permit Holder
(``TPH'') or person associated with or employed by a TPH may be subject
to a fine for violations of such Rules and the applicable fines that
may be imposed by the Exchange. Specifically, the proposed rule change
amends Rule 13.15(g) by: (1) Eliminating certain rule violations that
the Exchange no longer believes to be minor in nature; (2) updating the
fine schedule applicable to minor rule violations related to a Market-
Maker's failure to meet Exchange quoting obligations; and (3) making
other nonsubstantive changes.
First, the proposed rule change removes the following rule
violations and applicable fines from Rule 13.15(g): \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As a result of the proposed elimination of certain rule
violations listed under Rule 13.15(g), the proposed rule change
subsequently renumbers current Rules 13.15(g)(6), (8), (9), (11),
(13), (14), (15), (16), (17), (18), (19) and (20), to Rules
13.15(g)(4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14)
and (15), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 13.15(g)(4), which currently imposes certain fines
for failure to submit trade information on time and failure to submit
trade information to the Price Reporter pursuant to Rule 6.1 (Report
Transactions to the Exchange); \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Rule 6.1(a), which provides that a participant in each
transaction to be designated by the Exchange must report or ensure
the transaction is reported to the Exchange within 90 seconds of the
execution in a form and manner prescribed by the Exchange so that
the trade information may be reported to time and sales reports; and
Rule 6.1(c), which provides the Exchange-established procedure for
reporting transactions pursuant to Rule 6.1(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 13.15(g)(5), which currently imposes certain fines
for failure to honor the firm quote requirements of Rules 5.52 (Market-
Maker Quotes) \5\ and 5.59 (Firm Disseminated Market Quotes), to honor
the priority of marketable priority customer orders pursuant to Rules
5.32 and 5.85 (which among other things, govern customer priority on
the Exchange's trading floor),\6\, and to use due diligence in the
execution of orders for which the floor Trading Permit Holder maintains
an agency obligation pursuant to Rule 5.91 (Floor Broker
Responsibilities); \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Rule 5.52(a), which provides, in relevant part, that
Market-Maker bids and offers are firm for all orders under this Rule
and Rule 602 of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act (``Rule 602'')
for the number of contracts specified in the bid or offer, except
if: (1) A system malfunction or other circumstance impairs the
Exchange's ability to disseminate or update market bids and offers
in a timely and accurate manner; (2) the level of trading activities
or the existence of unusual market conditions is such that the
Exchange is incapable of collecting, processing, and making
available to quotation vendors the data for the option in a manner
that accurately reflects the current state of the market on the
Exchange; (3) prior to the conclusion of the Opening Auction
Process; or (4) any of the circumstances provided in Rule 602(c)(4)
exist.
\6\ Rule 5.85(a)(2)(A), which provides that Priority Customer
orders in the Book have first priority. If there are two or more
Priority Customer orders in the Book at the same price, the System
prioritizes them in the order in which the System received them
(i.e., in time priority). The Exchange notes that customer priority
for electronic executions is systematically enforced. See Rule
5.32(a)(2)(A).
\7\ See Rule 5.91(a), which provides that a Floor Broker
handling an order must use due diligence to execute the order at the
best price or prices available to him or, in accordance with the
Rules. Use of due diligence in handling and executing an order
includes: (1) Announcing to the trading crowd a request for quotes;
(2) taking the necessary measures to ensure the proper execution of
an order in accordance with firm quote obligations in Rule 5.52,
including the executable quantity of a quote from the trading crowd;
(3) the immediate and continuous representation at the trading
station where the applicable class trades of the following types of
orders: (A) Market orders; (B) limit orders to sell where the
specified price is at or below the current offer or; and (C) limit
orders to buy where the specified price is at or above the current
bid; (4) subject to the requirement to systematize orders prior to
representation pursuant to Rule 5.7(f), electronically recording the
time via a PAR workstation at which the Floor Broker initially
represents the order to the trading crowd; and (5) prioritizing the
Floor Broker's agency business over the Floor Broker's liquidation
orders (which liquidation orders are described in Rule 5.91(d)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 13.15(g)(7), which currently imposes certain fines
for any individual Trading Permit Holder who fails for more than 5% of
the Trading Permit Holder's transactions in any month to submit on the
date that a transaction is
[[Page 47347]]
executed the trade information required by Rule 6.1; \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Rule 6.1(b), which requires parties to a trade to
immediately record on a card or ticket, or enter in an electronic
data storage medium acceptable to the Exchange, (1) the assigned
broker initial code and clearing firm (if a Market-Maker); (2) the
symbol of the underlying security or index; (3) the type, expiration
month, and exercise price of the option contract; (4) the
transaction price; (5) the number of contract units comprising the
transaction; (6) the time of the transaction obtained from a source
designated by the Exchange; (7) the name of the contra Clearing
Trading Permit Holder; and (8) the assigned broker initial code of
the contra Trading Permit Holder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 13.15(g)(10), which currently imposes certain fines
for violations of Rule 8.14 (Communications to the Exchange or the
Clearing Corporation); \9\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Rule 8.14, which provides that no Trading Permit Holder,
person associated with a Trading Permit Holder or applicant to be a
Trading Permit Holder shall make any misrepresentation or omission
in any application, report or other communication to the Exchange,
or to the Clearing Corporation with respect to the reporting or
clearance of any Exchange transaction, or adjust any position at the
Clearing Corporation in any class of options traded on the Exchange
except for the purpose of correcting a bona fide error in recording
or of transferring the position to another account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 13.15(g)(12), which currently imposes certain fines
for trade-through violations pursuant to Rule 5.66 (Order
Protection).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Rule 5.66(a), which provides that, except as provided
in paragraph (b), Trading Permit Holders shall not effect Trade-
Throughs. The Exchange notes that trade-through compliance for
electronic executions are systematically enforced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, as a result of the proposed deletion of Rule
13.15(g)(4) and (g)(5), the proposed rule change also deletes
Interpretations and Policies .01 and .02 to Rule 13.15, as
Interpretation and Policy .01 exclusively relates to Rule 13.15(g)(5),
and Interpretation and Policy .02 exclusively relates to Rule
13.15(g)(4). The proposed rule change also moves the entirety of the
rule text in Interpretation and Policy .03, which exclusively
corresponds to current Rule 13.15(g)(6), into Rule 13.15(g)(6) itself.
Additionally, the proposed rule change moves the language currently in
footnote 1 into current Rule 13.15(g)(6). Footnote 1 provides that
Minor Rule Violation Fines imposed under this provision may be issued
by Exchange Floor Officials. The Exchange notes that, while footnote 1
is currently appended to Rule 13.15(g)(5), which is being deleted as
proposed herein, it more appropriately applies to current Rule
13.15(g)(6) (Violations of Trading Conduct and Decorum Policies), as
fines for violations of which are currently issued by Exchange Floor
Officials pursuant to Rule 5.80(c). Rule 5.80(c)(1)(A) specifically
provides that Exchange Floor Officials may fine TPHs and persons
employed by or associated with TPHs pursuant to Rule 13.15 for trading
conduct and decorum violations which are subject to fine under such
fine schedules. As such, the proposed relocation of the language in
footnote 1 merely provides additional clarity in the MRVP fine schedule
regarding the issuance of Minor Rule Violation fines for trading
conduct and decorum violations.
The Exchange no longer believes violations of the above-listed
rules to be minor in nature and therefore proposes to remove them from
the list of rules in Rule 13.15(g) eligible for a minor rule fine
disposition. Particularly, the Exchange believes that violations of
each of the rules listed above may directly impact trading on the
Exchange, maintenance of a fair and orderly market, and/or customer
protections. For example, the Exchange believes that the requirement to
submit trade information on time, to the Price Reporter and
consistently on an order's transaction date, as well as the requirement
to truthfully and accurately represent information in communications to
the Exchange and the Clearing Corporation allows the Exchange (and the
Clearing Corporation) to maintain an accurate audit trail and trade
information. Likewise, honoring firm quotations is vital in promoting
efficient functioning of intermarket price priority and trading in
general. Timely and accurate representation of both trade information
and quotations protects investors by providing them with accurate
information essential to their trading activities and participation in
the markets. Upholding due diligence to honor the priority of customer
orders and obligations as a principal, as well as the prohibition
against the execution of trades at prices inferior to protected
quotations (trade-throughs), all provide important customer
protections. Pursuant to Rule 13.15(f), the Exchange is not required to
impose a fine pursuant to its MRVP with respect to the violation of any
rule listed under Rule 13.15. If the Exchange determines that any
violation is intentional, egregious, or otherwise not minor in nature,
it may proceed under its formal disciplinary rules. As such, the
Exchange has increasingly chosen to handle such violations in recent
years under the Exchange's formal disciplinary rules, rather than
imposing a fine pursuant to its MRVP.
The proposed rule change next amends the fine schedule applicable
to Maker-Makers for failure to meet Exchange quoting obligations.
Specifically, Rule 13.15(g)(14) ((g)(9), as amended) \11\ provides that
a fine shall be imposed upon a Market-Maker, Designated Primary Market-
Maker or Lead Market Maker (as applicable) in accordance with the fine
schedule set forth below for the following conduct: \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See supra note 3.
\12\ The proposed rule change also makes nonsubstantive
clarifying updates to Rule 13.15(g)(14), by removing the conduct
listed in subparagraph (g)(14)(B) and updating the format in which
time is reflected. These nonsubstantive amendments are described in
further detail herein this proposal below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Failure to meet the continuous quoting obligation (Rule
5.52, 5.55, and 5.54);
<bullet> Failure to meet the initial quote volume requirements
(Rule 5.52); and
<bullet> Failure of a Lead Market-Maker or Designated Primary
Market-Maker to enter opening quotes within one minute following the
initiation of an opening rotation (e.g., 9:31 a.m.) in a series in its
appointed or allocated class, respectively, that is not open due to the
lack of a quote (see Rule 5.31(e)(2) or (j)(5)(B), as applicable)
(Rules 5.55 and 5.54), respectively.
For the first offense during any rolling 24-month period, the fine
schedule imposed by Rule 13.15(g)(14) currently permits the Exchange to
apply a fine ranging between $2,000 and $4,000. For subsequent offenses
during the same period, the fine schedule currently permits the
Exchange to apply a fine ranging between $4,000 and $5,000. The
proposed rule change updates the fine schedule to provide that, during
any rolling 24-month period, the Exchange may give a Letter of Caution
for a first offense, may apply a fine of $1,500 for a second offense,
may apply a fine of $3,000 for a third offense,\13\ and may proceed
with formal disciplinary action for subsequent offenses. As described
above, and as is the case for all rule violations covered under Rule
13.15(g), the Exchange may determine that a violation of Market-Maker
quoting obligations is intentional, egregious, or otherwise not minor
in nature and choose to proceed under the Exchange's formal
disciplinary rules rather than its MRVP.\14\ The Exchange may continue
to aggregate individual violations of
[[Page 47348]]
particular rules and treat such violations as a single offense.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Exchange notes that Rule 13.15(a) authorizes the
Exchange to impose a fine, not to exceed $5,000, for minor rule
violations in lieu of commencing a disciplinary proceeding.
Additionally, any fine imposed pursuant to Rule 13.15 that (1) does
not exceed $2,500 and (2) is not contested, shall be reported by the
Exchange to the Commission on a periodic, rather than a current,
basis, except as may otherwise be required by Exchange Act Rule 19d-
1 and by any other regulatory authority.
\14\ See Rule 13.15(f).
\15\ See Rule 13.15(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes it is appropriate to remove the range of
fines imposed for first and subsequent offenses and, instead, apply a
letter of caution for a first offense, a specified fine amount for a
second and a third offense, and formal disciplinary proceedings for
subsequent offenses. Particularly, the Exchange believes that applying
a lesser penalty (Letter of Caution) for a first offense and then
providing a higher, itemized fine per second and third offenses and,
ultimately, formal disciplinary proceedings for any subsequent offenses
during a rolling 24-month period, will allow the Exchange to levy
progressively larger fines and greater penalties against repeat-
offenders (as opposed to a fine range for any offenses that may come
after a first offense). The Exchange believes this fine structure may
serve to more effectively deter repeat-offenders while providing
reasonable warning for a first offense during a rolling 24-month
period. The Exchange notes that a lesser penalty in the form of a
warning letter for a first offense paired with a greater penalty in the
form of formal disciplinary proceedings after a finite number of
following offenses is consistent with the minor rule violation fine
schedules applicable to minor rule violations of substantially the same
market maker quoting obligations on the Exchange's affiliated options
exchanges, EDGX and BZX,\16\ as well as substantially similar market
maker quoting obligations on another options exchange.\17\ The Exchange
notes that the proposed change is intended to provide for consistency
across the Exchange's MRVP and the MRVPs of its affiliated options
exchanges. Additionally, EDGX and BZX also intend to file proposals to
update their minor rule violation fines so that second, third, and
subsequent offenses for violating market maker quoting obligations will
receive the same sanctions,\18\ as proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See BZX Rule 25.3(d); and EDGX Rule 25.3(d).
\17\ See e.g., MIAX Options Rule 1014(d)(7).
\18\ The Exchange again notes that pursuant to the BZX and EDGX
MRVPs, first offenses regarding market maker quoting obligations
already receive a Letter of Caution and the highest/last range of
offenses (currently 5 or more) are already subject to formal
disciplinary action. See supra note 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change also makes nonsubstantive clarifying
changes to certain provisions in Rule 13.15(g). The proposed rule
change makes a clean-up revision by removing the conduct listed in
subparagraph (g)(14)(B), ``failure to meet the applicable quote width
requirements (Rule 5.52),'' because, as of 2019, Market-Makers are no
longer subject to a quote width requirement.\19\ The proposed rule
change amends the subsequent lettering in subparagraph (g)(14) as a
result of this revision. The proposed rule change corrects a typo in
the fine amounts that inadvertently contain an additional digit in
subparagraph (g)(8). The proposed rule change also updates the time
format in the example provided in subparagraph (g)(14)(D), which is
currently reflected in Central Time, to instead reflect Eastern Time
without time zone indication. This proposed change is consistent with
Rule 1.6, which states that unless otherwise specified, all times in
the Rules are Eastern Time, and conforms the time reflected in
(g)(14)(D) to the time format reflected throughout the Rules. The
proposed rule change corrects the cross-reference to Rule 5.24(e) in
Rule 13.15(g)(19) to, instead, correctly reflect Rule 5.5(d). The
Exchange previously restructured its Rulebook in connection with a 2019
technology migration and, prior to this restructuring, the provision in
current Rule 13.15(g)(19) referred to what is now Rule 5.5(d) (former
Rule 6.23A(f)),\20\ instead of what is now Rule 5.24(e) (former Rule
6.18). Upon restructuring Chapter 13,\21\ the Exchange inadvertently
changed the cross-reference in Rule 13.15(g)(19) to reflect the
incorrect rule and now proposes to update this cross-reference to
reflect the correct and originally intended cross-reference to Rule
5.5(d). Likewise, the Exchange updates a cross-reference to prior Rule
5.25 to current Rule 5.5 in subparagraph (g)(19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87024 (September
19, 2019), 84 FR 50545 (September 25, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-059).
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87320 (October 16,
2019), 84 FR 56501 (October 22, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-095).
\21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87210 (October 3,
2019), 84 FR 54190 (October 9, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-068).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\22\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \23\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) \24\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change to remove
certain rules listed as eligible for a minor rule fine disposition
under its MRVP, which it no longer considers violations of which to be
minor in nature, will assist the Exchange in preventing fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices and promoting just and equitable
principles of trade, and will serve to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest.
Particularly, the Exchange believes that violations of each of the
rules proposed to be removed from its MRVP may directly impact trading
on the Exchange, maintenance of a fair and orderly market, and/or
customer protection. As such, the Exchange does not believe violations
of these rules to be minor in nature and, instead, should continue to
be handled under its formal disciplinary rules, as the Exchange has
chosen to handle the majority of all such violations in recent years,
rather than imposing fines pursuant to its MRVP.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change to remove
the range of fines imposed for first and subsequent Market-Maker
quoting offenses and, instead, apply a letter of caution for a first
offense, a specified fine amount for a second and a third offense, and
formal disciplinary proceedings for subsequent offenses will assist the
Exchange in preventing fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices
and promoting just and equitable principles of trade, and will serve to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors
and the public interest. Particularly, the Exchange believes that
applying a lesser penalty (Letter of Caution) for a first offense and
then providing an itemized fine per second
[[Page 47349]]
and third offenses and, ultimately, formal disciplinary proceedings for
any subsequent offenses during a rolling 24-month period, will allow
the Exchange to levy greater penalties (i.e., formal disciplinary
proceedings) against repeat-offenders (as opposed to a fine range for
any offenses that may come after a first offense) which may serve to
more effectively deter repeat-offenders while providing reasonable
warning for a first offense during a rolling 24-month period. The
Exchange believes that more effectively deterring repeat-offenders and
making first instance offenders aware of their quoting obligation
violations and the subsequent consequences for continued failure, will,
in turn, further motivate Market-Makers to continue to uphold their
quoting obligations, providing liquid markets to the benefit of all
investors. The Exchange again notes that a lesser penalty in the form
of a warning letter for a first offense paired with greater penalties
in the form of eventual formal disciplinary proceedings following a
finite number of offenses is consistent with the minor rule violation
fine schedules applicable to minor rule violations of substantially the
same market maker quoting obligations on the Exchange's affiliated
options exchanges, EDGX and BZX.\25\ As such, the proposed rule change
is also designed to benefit investors by providing from consistent
penalties across the MRVPs of the Exchange and its affiliated options
exchanges. As described above, EDGX and BZX intend to file proposals to
update their minor rule violation fines so that second, third, and
subsequent offenses for violating market maker quoting obligations will
receive the same sanctions,\26\ as proposed herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See supra note 16.
\26\ See supra note 18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the proposed clarifications and corrections, as
applicable, in connection with footnote 1 of Rule 13.15, Interpretation
and Policy .03 to Rule 13.15, and Rules 13.15(g)(8), (14) and (19) will
benefit investors by adding clarity to the Rules.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed rule changes to
Rule 13.15(g) are consistent with Section 6(b)(6) of the Act,\27\ which
provides that members and persons associated with members shall be
appropriately disciplined for violation of the provisions of the rules
of the exchange, by expulsion, suspension, limitation of activities,
functions, and operations, fine, censure, being suspended or barred
from being associated with a member, or any other fitting sanction. As
noted, the proposed rule change removes certain Rules listed as
eligible for a minor rule fine disposition under the Exchange's MRVP
that the Exchange no longer believes violations of which are minor in
nature and are more appropriately disciplined through the Exchange's
formal disciplinary procedures, and amends the fine schedule applicable
to Market-Maker failures to meet their quoting obligations in a manner
that appropriately sanctions such failures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that the proposed change is designed to
provide a fair procedure for the disciplining of members and persons
associated with members, consistent with Sections 6(b)(7) and 6(d) of
the Act.\28\ Rule 13.15, currently and as amended, does not preclude a
TPH or person associated with or employed by a TPH from contesting an
alleged violation and receiving a hearing on the matter with the same
procedural rights through a litigated disciplinary proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7) and 78f(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues but rather is concerned
solely with amending its MRVP in connection with rules eligible for a
minor rule fine disposition and with the fine schedule for Market-Maker
failures to meet quoting obligations. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule changes, overall, will strengthen the Exchange's ability
to carry out its oversight and enforcement functions and deter
potential violative conduct.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c1e190009410f0301010902181f2c1f090f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b090e171e56181416161e150f083b081e18551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-045 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-045. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-045 and should be submitted on
or before September 14, 2021.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\29\ In
particular, the
[[Page 47350]]
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\30\ which requires that the rules of an
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to remove impediments and to perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The Commission also believes that
the proposal is consistent with Sections 6(b)(1) and 6(b)(6) of the Act
\31\ which require that the rules of an exchange enforce compliance
with, and provide appropriate discipline for, violations of Commission
and Exchange rules. Finally, the Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the public interest, the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as required by
Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the Act,\32\ which governs minor rule violation
plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and 78f(b)(6).
\32\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As stated above, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 13.15(g) by:
(1) Eliminating certain rule violations that the Exchange no longer
believes to be minor in nature; (2) updating the fine schedule
applicable to minor rule violations related to a Market-Maker's failure
to meet Exchange quoting obligations; and (3) making other non-
substantive changes.
The Commission believes that Rule 13.15 is an effective way to
discipline a member for a minor violation of a rule. The Commission
finds that the Exchange's proposal to eliminate rules that the Exchange
no longer believes to be minor in nature from the MRVP and amending the
fee schedule related to a Market-Maker's failure to meet the Exchange's
quoting obligations is consistent with the Act because it may help the
Exchange's ability to better carry out its oversight and enforcement
responsibilities. Lastly, the Commission also believes that the
Exchange's proposal to make non-substantive changes are consistent with
the Act because they add clarity to the Exchange's rules.
In approving the propose rule change, the Commission in no way
minimizes the importance of compliance with the Exchange's rules and
all other rules subject to fines under Rule 13.15. The Commission
believes that a violation of any self-regulatory organization's rules,
as well as Commission rules, is a serious matter. However, Rule 13.15
provides a reasonable means of addressing rule violations that may not
rise to the level of requiring formal disciplinary proceedings, while
providing greater flexibility in handling certain violations. The
Commission expects that the Exchange will continue to conduct
surveillance with due diligence and make a determination based on its
findings, on a case-by-case basis, whether a fine of more or less than
the recommended amount is appropriate for a violation under Rule 13.15
or whether a violation requires formal disciplinary action.
For the same reasons discussed above, the Commission finds good
cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\33\ for approving the
proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of the notice of the filing thereof in the Federal
Register. The proposal will assist the Exchange in preventing
fraudulent and manipulative practices by allowing the Exchange to
adequately enforce compliance with, and provide appropriate discipline
for, violations of Exchange rules. Accordingly, the Commission believes
that a full notice-and-comment period is not necessary before approving
the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act
\34\ and Rule 19d-1(c)(2) thereunder,\35\ that the proposed rule change
(SR-CBOE-2021-045) be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-18123 Filed 8-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 24, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.