Notice2021-17674
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Receipt of Petition for Rulemaking for Atlantic Cod
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 18, 2021
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Abstract
NMFS announces the receipt of a petition for rulemaking from the Conservation Law Foundation. This petition requests NMFS prepare a Secretarial Amendment and take specific emergency action to end overfishing and rebuild Atlantic cod.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 157 (Wednesday, August 18, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46226-46227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17674]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID 0648-XA720]
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Receipt of Petition for Rulemaking for Atlantic
Cod
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of receipt of petition for rulemaking; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt of a petition for rulemaking from
the Conservation Law Foundation. This petition requests NMFS prepare a
Secretarial Amendment and take specific emergency action to end
overfishing and rebuild Atlantic cod.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 4, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2021-0039,
by either of the following methods:
<bullet> Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a> and enter NOAA-NMFS-2021-0039 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publically accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Christopher, Supervisory Fishery
Policy Analyst, telephone 978-281-9288, email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5c5d0c1d0c79bd6ddc7dcc6c1dac5ddd0c7f5dbdad4d49bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="29594c5d4c5b074a415b405a5d4659414c5b6947464848074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) has
petitioned NMFS to implement emergency regulations and a Secretarial
Amendment for the Northeast multispecies fishery, and other relevant
fisheries that use gear capable of catching more than a minimal amount
of Atlantic cod. CLF's petition asserts that NMFS has repeatedly
approved New England Fishery Management Council actions that have
failed to prevent and end overfishing and rebuild Atlantic cod stocks.
CLF is petitioning NMFS to implement conservation and management
measures it deems necessary to end overfishing and rebuild the Gulf of
Maine and Georges Bank cod stocks.
CLF cites numerous reasons for NMFS to take Secretarial action. CLF
asserts that NMFS has consistently approved management measures that
failed to address low recruitment, neglected to account for model
errors and uncertainty when setting catch advice, approved uncertainty
buffers that do not account for this uncertainty, and approved the use
of an inadequate acceptable biological catch (ABC) control rule. In
addition, CLF states that NMFS has failed to conduct adequate
rebuilding progress reviews for both the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank
cod stocks as required under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), or as required by the
supplemental rebuilding program review process implemented in Framework
Adjustment 51 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP). This review process requires the Council to review a rebuilding
plan if: The total catch limit for a stock has not been exceeded during
the rebuilding program; new scientific information indicates that the
stock is not rebuilding according to the program trajectory; and if the
fishing mortality associated with rebuilding (Frebuild) drops below 75
percent of the fishing mortality associated with maximum sustainable
yield (FMSY)). According to CLF, the Gulf of Maine cod stock has met
all three of these criteria, but the Council has not initiated its
required rebuilding program review. Further, CLF asserts that NMFS has
failed to recognize or account for the findings of a National Research
Council (NRC) Rebuilding Committee, which identified several reasons
why stocks may not rebuild as expected under their respective
rebuilding plans. Finally, CLF states that in NMFS's denial of a 2015
petition for rulemaking on Gulf of Maine cod, NMFS committed to prevent
overfishing, rebuild the stock, and adjust management measures as
needed in response to the findings of a 2015 assessment. CLF asserts
that these commitments were not upheld, and that NMFS did not properly
balance biological and socioeconomic impacts in its rationale to deny
the 2015 petition.
CLF's petition also alleges that inadequate at-sea monitoring
coverage in the sector fishery has failed to provide sufficiently
accurate and precise data to prevent and end overfishing or rebuild the
cod stocks. CLF asserts that inadequate monitoring coverage targets,
coupled with low quotas, have created incentives for the fishing
industry to illegally discard and misreport cod catch. Additionally,
CLF relies on recent analyses in the development of Amendment 23 to the
Northeast Multispecies FMP indicating
[[Page 46227]]
that there is an observer effect in the Northeast multispecies fishery.
This observer effect could mean observed trips are not representative
of unobserved trips. CLF also states that, without accurate and precise
catch data, managers cannot appropriately apply the accountability
measures that are designed to prevent overfishing.
Last, CLF states that measures to protect essential fish habitat,
help rebuild cod stock age structure, account for sub-populations, and
account for climate change impacts, are critical to cod recovery. CLF
asserts that the rebuilding plans that have been implemented for cod do
not identify and protect critical cod spawning areas or adequately
conserve habitat for juvenile cod. CLF also states that past management
actions have failed to address truncated cod stock age structures,
which may contribute to reduced recruitment and decreased resilience to
stressors. CLF asserts that managing cod as two stocks (Gulf of Maine
and Georges Bank) fails to account for sub-populations, and that recent
research by the Atlantic Cod Stock Working Group suggests that at least
three sub-populations exist. Differences in the characteristics of
these sub-populations, such as differences in spawning seasonality, are
important for stock recovery. Finally, CLF states that stock
assessments and management measures for Atlantic cod must account for
impacts to the stock due to climate change, especially since
temperature and other environmental conditions have been shown to
impact cod biology.
The CLF petition requests NMFS implement all of the following
conservation and management measures.
1. 100-percent at-sea monitoring on all commercial groundfish
trips.
2. Measures to prohibit directed commercial and recreational
fishing for Atlantic cod that:
a. Implement large area closures once a stock's incidental limit is
caught;
b. Reduce the incidental catch rate annually, consistent with the
current ABC control rule until overfishing is ended;
c. Prioritize the allocation of incidental catch to groundfish
vessels, consistent with the current methodology; and
d. Ensure that any incidental catch history during the closure of
the directed fishery will not count towards future potential sector
contributions.
3. Area closures to protect all identified Atlantic cod spawning
locations and favorable habitat for juvenile and adult cod.
4. A requirement to use modified groundfish gear, such as haddock
separator trawl or other selective fishing technology, throughout the
U.S. range of Atlantic cod to reduce incidental cod catch.
5. Additional measures in the recreational fisheries to reduce the
mortality of incidental catch of Atlantic cod.
In a letter dated June 10, 2020, NMFS requested the New England
Fishery Management Council consider the petition. Because Council
development of fishery management measures is the core of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, NMFS wanted to ensure that the Council considered the
petition and had the opportunity to take appropriate action through the
Council process if it deemed that such action was necessary. After
considering the petition at its June Council meeting, the Council sent
a letter to NMFS on November 27, 2020, describing its consideration and
conclusions. The Council concluded that the petition does not have
merit based on its rejection of CLF's assertions underlying its claim
that the Council has failed to take measures necessary to protect cod
and declined to consider a majority of CLF's recommended measures. The
Council stated that it already approved increasing monitoring
requirements in Amendment 23 to the Northeast Multispecies FMP. Also,
it is important to note that the Council plans to consider how new cod
stock structure information may affect development of conservation and
management measures and is advocating for the development of a new
data-limited modeling approach for the Eastern George Bank cod. See
ADDRESSES for the Council's letter and grounds for its decision.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act authorizes regional fishery management
councils to develop fishery management measures, and specifically
provides the New England Fishery Management Council with the authority
to manage the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank cod stocks. For the
reasons described above and in the Council's letter to NMFS, the
Council declined to take additional action on Atlantic cod after
reviewing the contents of the petition. However, CLF has provided
sufficient information and support in its request for Secretarial
action to warrant publication of a notice seeking public comment.
In addition to the petition and information provided by CLF and the
Council, NMFS will consider comments received when determining whether
to proceed with the development of conservation and management measures
suggested by the petition. Upon determining whether to initiate the
rulemaking suggested by the petition, the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, will publish a notice of the agency's decision or
action in the Federal Register.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 12, 2021.
Kelly Denit,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-17674 Filed 8-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 18, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.