Safety Zone; Barge Big Digger and Tugs Kimberly Anne and Andrew J Operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
This rule amends an earlier safety zone titled "Safety Zone; Tugs Kimberly Anne and Westwind and Barge Big Digger Operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI" issued on May 26, 2021, because one of the tug vessels named in the earlier rule has changed. The size, duration, and purpose of the safety zone remains the same. This rule continues to restrict entry into a 500-yard radius around two tugs and a barge engaged in pipeline-related work in the Straits of Mackinac. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the potential hazards created by the work, inspection, diving, and surveying of pipelines in the Straits of Mackinac.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46968-46970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17337]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2021-0338]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Barge Big Digger and Tugs Kimberly Anne and Andrew J
Operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends an earlier safety zone titled ``Safety Zone;
Tugs Kimberly Anne and Westwind and Barge Big Digger Operating in the
Straits of Mackinac, MI'' issued on May 26, 2021, because one of the
tug vessels named in the earlier rule has changed. The size, duration,
and purpose of the safety zone remains the same. This rule continues to
restrict entry into a 500-yard radius around two tugs and a barge
engaged in pipeline-related work in the Straits of Mackinac. The safety
zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from the potential hazards created by the work, inspection,
diving, and surveying of pipelines in the Straits of Mackinac.
DATES: This interim rule is effective without actual notice from August
23, 2021 through October 15, 2021. Comments and related material must
be received by the Coast Guard on or before September 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0338 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Deaven Palenzuela, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard at (906) 635-3223 or email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b1818061b190e1d0e051f0204052b1e18080c45060207"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e89b9b85989a8d9e8d869c818786a89d9b8b8fc6858184">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abbreviations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On May 26, 2021, the Coast Guard published a temporary interim
rule, at 86 FR 28268, that established a temporary safety zone around
the tug vessels KIMBERLY ANNE and WESTWIND, as well as barge BIG
DIGGER. This safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment from the potential hazards created by the work,
inspection, diving, and surveying of pipelines in the Straits of
Mackinac. In July 2021, the construction company notified the Coast
Guard that it needed to switch out the tug vessel WESTWIND for the tug
vessel ANDREW J. This interim rule amends the existing safety zone to
remove the name of the tug vessel WESTWIND and replace it with the name
of the tug ANDREW J.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
undergoing notice and comment procedures pursuant to section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior public
notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be
impracticable and unnecessary. The pipeline work is ongoing and the
barge is on site, and the unexpected switch of attending tug vessel did
not allow time for meaningful public comment before making the change.
Moreover, the change to the specific tug vessel attending the barge BIG
DIGGER does not change the scope, timing, or other details of the
ongoing work, and is therefore of little interest to the public.
Because this safety zone will be in place until October 15,
however, there is time to provide a 30-day public comment period after
the effective date of this rule. The Coast Guard will consider all
public comments received, and may change the rule in response to
comments if doing so is appropriate.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed
above, delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable
and unnecessary.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) has determined that potential hazards created by the work,
inspection, diving, and surveying of underwater infrastructure in the
Straits of Mackinac that started June 1, 2021, will be a safety concern
for anyone within a 500-yard radius of the tugs and barge. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone while the operation is
conducted.
III. Discussion of the Rule
This rule revises an existing safety zone that is anticipated to
continue until October 15, 2021. The safety zone continues to cover all
navigable waters within 500 yards of the barge BIG DIGGER and its
attending tugs, which are being used to work, inspect, dive, and survey
pipelines in the Straits of Mackinac. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in
these navigable waters while the operation is conducted. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The only
change this rule makes to the existing safety zone is a change to the
specific tug named.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is
[[Page 46969]]
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,''
under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which would impact a small area of the
Straits of Mackinac. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the
rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
E. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
F. Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538,
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Although this rule will not result
in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a determination that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule involves a safety zone that will prohibit
entry within 500 yards of tugs and barges used to used to work,
inspect, dive, and survey pipelines in the Straits of Mackinac. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L[60(a)] of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. If your material cannot be
submitted using <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>, call or email the person in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
To view documents mentioned as being available in the docket, find
the docket as described in the previous paragraph, and then select
``Supporting & Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public
comments will also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by
following instructions on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> Frequently
Asked Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will
only post comments that
[[Page 46970]]
address the topic of the rule. We may choose not to post off-topic,
inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1,
Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.T09-0338 by revising the section heading and
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0338 Safety Zone; Tugs Kimberly Anne and Andrew J and
Barge Big Digger operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI.
(a) Location. The following areas are safety zones: All navigable
water within 500 yards of the Tugs Kimberly Anne and Andrew J and Barge
Big Digger while conducting work, inspection, diving, and surveying of
pipelines in the Straits of Mackinac.
* * * * *
Dated: August 9, 2021.
A.R. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2021-17337 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.