Rule2021-17019
Procedures for the Commission's Use of Certain Authorities Under Rule 21F-3(b)(3) and Rule 21F-6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 13, 2021
Effective
August 13, 2021
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Abstract
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission" or "SEC") is issuing this statement to clarify how the SEC will proceed when addressing certain issues under Exchange Act Rule 21F-3(b)(3) and Exchange Act Rule 21F-6 while the staff is preparing and the Commission is considering potential amendments to those rules ("Interim Policy- Review Period"). These procedures will remain in effect until withdrawn by the Commission.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 154 (Friday, August 13, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44604-44606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17019]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 241
[Release No. 34-92565]
Procedures for the Commission's Use of Certain Authorities Under
Rule 21F-3(b)(3) and Rule 21F-6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Policy statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or
``SEC'') is issuing this statement to clarify how the SEC will proceed
when addressing certain issues under Exchange Act Rule 21F-3(b)(3) and
Exchange Act Rule 21F-6 while the staff is preparing and the Commission
is considering potential amendments to those rules (``Interim Policy-
Review Period''). These procedures will remain in effect until
withdrawn by the Commission.
DATES: The policy statement is effective: August 13, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Pasquinelli, Acting Chief in the
Office of the Whistleblower, Division of Enforcement, at (202) 551-
5973; William K. Shirey, Counsel to the Solicitor, Office of the
General Counsel, at (202) 551-5043; Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Consumer Protection and Wall Street
[[Page 44605]]
Reform Act of 2010 (``Dodd-Frank Act''), Section 21F was added to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78u-1 et
seq., to establish a new SEC whistleblower award program. Section 21F
provides that, pursuant to regulations adopted by the SEC, a monetary
award shall be paid to any eligible whistleblower who provides the SEC
with original information about a securities law violation that leads
to the SEC's success in obtaining a monetary order of more than a
million dollars in an SEC judicial or administrative enforcement action
(``covered action''). If an eligible whistleblower qualifies for an
award, the SEC must pay an award that is at least 10%, but no more than
30%, of the amount of the monetary sanctions collected in the SEC
enforcement action.
Section 21F further provides that if the SEC makes a whistleblower
award in connection with its own enforcement action, the whistleblower
becomes potentially eligible for an award in connection with any
related enforcement actions (``related actions'') that are successfully
litigated using the whistleblower's same original information. The
potential related enforcement actions must be brought either by a self-
regulatory organization or certain statutorily identified governmental
authorities (such as the U.S. Department of Justice or a state attorney
general in connection with a criminal proceeding).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Exchange Act 21F(a)(5) (defining related action);
Exchange Act Rule 21F-3(b)(1) (same).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In May 2011, the Commission adopted rules to govern the operation
of the whistleblower award program. In September 2020, the Commission
adopted various amendments to the Whistleblower Program rules,
including two amendments that whistleblower advocates and others have
asserted are unfair to whistleblowers and may risk reducing the
willingness of individuals to blow the whistle. These amendments were
made to: (1) Exchange Act Rule 21F-3, which addresses the criteria for
making an award based on a whistleblower's contributions to the
successful resolution of a related action; and (2) Exchange Act Rule
21F-6, which establishes the criteria that the Commission may consider
when determining the appropriate award amount.
<bullet> Relevant Amendment to Exchange Act Rule 21F-3. The 2020
Amendments added new subparagraph (c) to Rule 21F-3 to govern
situations where a whistleblower has filed a claim for an award in
connection with a potential related action but that action is
potentially also covered by a second, separate award program (such as,
for example, the federal whistleblower award program that the Internal
Revenue Service administers, see 26 U.S.C. 7623). New paragraph (c)
authorizes the Commission to determine, based on the facts and
circumstances of the claims and misconduct at issue in the potential
related action (among other factors), whether the Commission's
whistleblower program or the other whistleblower program has the more
``direct or relevant connection to the [related] action.'' And
responsibility for making an award in connection with the potential
related action will then rest with whichever award program is
determined to have the more direct or relevant connection to the
action.
<bullet> Relevant Amendment to Exchange Act Rule 21F-6. The 2020
Amendments added language to permit the Commission to consider, in its
discretion, the dollar amount of a potential award when making an award
determination. Before this amendment, the text of the rule (with one
limited exception) did not expressly afford the Commission authority to
consider the potential dollar amount of an award when determining
awards; rather, the text of the rule generally referred to setting
awards as a percentage of the monetary sanctions recovered.
II. Procedures Available During the Interim Policy-Review Period
On August 2, 2021, Chair Gensler issued a public statement advising
that he has directed the staff to prepare for the Commission's
consideration later this year potential changes to Rules 21F-3(b)(3)
and Rule 21F-6 to address policy concerns raised by whistleblower
advocates and others about possible adverse effects of the 2020
Amendments.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See also SEC's Spring 2021 Regulatory Agenda (publicly
available at: <a href="https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=202104&RIN=3235-AN03">https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=202104&RIN=3235-AN03</a>) (``The Commission is
considering additional amendments to the rules governing the
Whistleblower Program established by the Dodd-Frank Act.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the staff is preparing and the Commission is considering
potential additional rulemaking, the procedures discussed below are
available to whistleblowers with claims pending during the Interim
Policy-Review Period so that they are not disadvantaged under the
components of Rule 21F-3(b)(3) and Rule 21F-6 that may be revised.
These interim procedures are consistent with the SEC's overarching goal
of protecting investors and the United States capital markets by
encouraging whistleblowers to come forward to report violations of the
federal securities laws and then rewarding them when their information
leads to successful enforcement actions.
A. Exchange Act Rule 21F-3(b)(3)
For any claim that may be subject to Rule 21F-3(b)(3) during the
Interim Policy-Review Period, the Commission directs as follows:
1. Before providing a preliminary determination to a claimant, or a
proposed recommendation to the Commission, the staff shall consider
whether to recommend that the Commission's exemptive authority under
Section 36(a) of the Exchange Act \3\ should be utilized to permit an
award on a potential related action irrespective of the limitations of
Rule 21F-3(b)(3) if:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In pertinent part, Section 36(a) provides that ``by rule,
regulation, or order, may conditionally or unconditionally exempt
any person . . . from any provision or provisions of [the Exchange
Act] or of any rule or regulation thereunder, to the extent that
such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
and is consistent with the protection of investors.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) The alternative whistleblower program has an award cap or award
range that could disadvantage the particular claimant; \4\ or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See, e.g., 12 U.S.C. 4205(d)(1) (establishing a
whistleblower award program in connection with the Financial
Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, but
capping awards at $1.6 million).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) the Commission is aware or the claimant demonstrates a
likelihood that a condition or exclusion would apply to his or her
award claim under the alternative award program and the staff
determines that the claimant would likely obtain an award were he or
she permitted to proceed under the SEC's award program.
2. For any other award claim under Rule 21F-3(b)(3) for which the
staff determines that an alternative whistleblower program has a ``more
direct or relevant connection'' to the potential related action than
the Commission's award program does, the staff will inform the claimant
of its assessment. The claimant may then request that the related-
action award claim held in abeyance during the Interim Policy-Review
Period.\5\ Further, any related-action award claim that is held in
abeyance shall not impact the
[[Page 44606]]
timely processing of any award claim arising from a covered Commission
enforcement action that is successfully litigated using the claimant's
same original information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Commission contemplates that there should be no impact
on the timely processing of any related-action award claim that the
staff deems to have a ``more direct or relevant connection to the
Commission's whistleblower program.'' However, if a majority of the
Commission should subsequently disagree with that determination, the
claimant shall be notified and may request to have the related-
action award claim held in abeyance during the Interim Policy-Review
Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Exchange Act Rule 21F-6
With respect to Rule 21F-6, the Commission at the time it adopted
the 2020 rulemaking amendments explained that the amendment in question
was a clarification of discretionary authority the Commission already
possessed.\6\ The Commission anticipates that, going forward, it will
continue its practice of considering dollar amounts only in connection
with provisions of the rules that explicitly contemplate the use of
such discretion to raise awards (i.e., law enforcement interest prong
of 21F-6(a)(3) and the application of the presumption embodied in Rule
21F-6(c)). In the unlikely event that the staff or the Commission
should consider deviating from this practice, the staff will inform the
claimant that such action is being considered. The claimant may then
request that the matter be held in abeyance during the Interim Policy-
Review Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The extent to which the amendment was a clarification was a
point of disagreement at the time that the Commission adopted the
amended rules in 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Other Matters
Publication for notice and comment is not required under the
Administrative Procedure Act (``APA'') pursuant to the exemption for
agency rules of organization, procedure, or practice.\7\ It follows
that the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act do not
apply.\8\ The effective date is August 13, 2021. In accordance with the
APA,\9\ we find that there is good cause to establish an effective date
less than 30 days after publication. The Commission believes that
establishing an effective date less than 30 days after publication of
this document is necessary to clarify how the SEC will proceed when
addressing certain issues under Exchange Act Rule 21F-3(b)(3) and
Exchange Act Rule 21F-6 while the staff is preparing and the Commission
is considering potential amendments to those rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
\8\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
\9\ 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has determined that the foregoing relates only to
agency procedures and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. The foregoing is therefore not a
``rule'' under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C).
Finally, the Commission has adopted the foregoing under the
authority set forth in Sections 3(b), 21F, and 23(a) of the Exchange
Act.
By the Commission.
Dated: August 5, 2021.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17019 Filed 8-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 13, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.