Notice2021-16897
Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and Components Thereof; Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 9, 2021
Issuing agencies
International Trade Commission
Abstract
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, in this investigation and has issued a general exclusion order prohibiting the importation of infringing high-density fiber optic equipment and components thereof and cease and desist orders directed against Respondents Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. ("Leviton"), Panduit Corporation ("Panduit"), and FS.com Inc. ("FS").
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 150 (Monday, August 9, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 150 (Monday, August 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43564-43566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16897]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1194]
Certain High-Density Fiber Optic Equipment and Components
Thereof; Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
Orders; Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, in this investigation and has issued a general
exclusion order prohibiting the importation of infringing high-density
fiber optic equipment and components thereof and cease and desist
orders directed against Respondents Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
(``Leviton''), Panduit Corporation (``Panduit''), and <a href="http://FS.com">FS.com</a> Inc.
(``FS'').
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at <a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b6e6f627818634e475b6b5e58425f48054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2366676a70106b464f536356504a57400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 24, 2020, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Corning
Optical Communications LLC (``Corning'') of Charlotte, North Carolina.
85 FR 16653 (Mar. 24, 2020). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain high-density fiber optic equipment and components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,020,320
(``the '320 patent''); 10,120,153 (``the '153 patent''); 8,712,206
(``the '206 patent''); 10,094,996 (``the '996 patent''); and 10,444,456
(``the '456 patent''). Id. The complaint further alleged that a
domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's notice of investigation
named the following as respondents: Total Cable Solutions, Inc.
(``TCS'') of Springboro, Ohio; Legrand North America, LLC (``Legrand'')
of West Hartford, Connecticut; AFL Telecommunications Holdings LLC
(``AFL Holdings'') of Duncan, South Carolina; Huber+Suhner AG of
Herisau, Switzerland; Huber + Suhner, Inc. of Charlotte, North
Carolina; Shenzhen Anfkom Telecom Co., Ltd. d/b/a Anfkom Telecom
(``Anfkom'') of Shenzhen, China; Shanghai TARLUZ Telecom Tech. Co.,
Ltd. d/b/a TARLUZ (``TARLUZ'') of Shanghai, China; Wulei Technology
Co., Ltd. d/b/a Bonelinks (``Wulei Bonelinks'') of Shenzhen, China; FS
of New Castle, Delaware; Leviton of Melville, New York; Panduit of
Tinley, Illinois; The LAN Wirewerks Research Laboratories Inc. d/b/a
Wirewerks (``Wirewerks'') of Quebec, Canada; and The Siemon Company
(``Siemon'') of Watertown, Connecticut. Id. The notice of investigation
also named the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') as a
party. Id. at 16654.
Respondent Legrand was terminated from the investigation based on
withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint pursuant to Commission
Rule 210.21(a), 19 CFR 210.21(a). See Order No. 5 (Apr. 16, 2020);
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May 7, 2020). The complaint and notice of
investigation were amended to substitute AFL Telecommunications LLC for
respondent AFL Holdings. 85 FR 44923 (July 24, 2020). Thereafter,
Respondent AFL Telecommunications LLC was terminated from the
investigation based on a settlement agreement. See Order No. 27 (Oct.
20, 2020), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Nov. 2, 2020). Respondents
Huber+Suhner AG, Huber + Suhner, Inc., Anfkom, TARLUZ, and Wulei
Bonelinks (collectively, ``Defaulting Respondents'') were found in
default pursuant to Commission Rule 210.16, 19 CFR 210.16. See Order
Nos. 7 & 8 (June 9, 2020), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (June 22, 2020);
Order No. 13 (Aug. 21, 2020), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Sep. 15,
2020). Respondent TCS was terminated from the investigation based on a
consent order. See Comm'n Notice (Sept. 28, 2020). Accordingly,
Respondents Panduit, Leviton, Siemon, FS, and Wirewerks (collectively,
``Active
[[Page 43565]]
Respondents'') remain active in the investigation.
As a result of termination of all asserted claims of the '996
patent and certain other asserted claims, see Order No. 11 (July 29,
2020), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Aug. 13, 2020); Order No. 18 (Sept.
14, 2020), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 14, 2020); and Order No.
19 (Oct. 2, 2020), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 27, 2020), claims
1 and 3 of the '320 patent; claims 11, 12, 14-16, 19, 21, 27, and 28 of
the '456 patent; claims 9, 16, 23, and 26 of the '153 patent; and
claims 22 and 23 of the '206 patent remain asserted in the
investigation.
A prehearing conference and evidentiary hearing were held in this
investigation from October 21-26, 2020.
On March 23, 2021, the administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued a
final initial determination (``ID''), finding a violation of section
337 with respect to claims 1 and 3 of the '320 patent; claims 11, 12,
14-16, 19, 21, 27, and 28 of the '456 patent; claims 9, 16, 23, and 26
of the '153 patent; and claims 22 and 23 of the '206 patent. The ALJ
also issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding (``RD'').
The RD recommends that should the Commission find a violation of
section 337, that the Commission issue a general exclusion order, cease
and desist orders, and impose a bond during the period of Presidential
review.
On April 5, 2021, OUII and Respondent Leviton each filed a petition
for review of the ID. That same day, Respondents FS, Panduit,
Wirewerks, and Siemon (collectively, ``Joint Respondents'') also filed
a joint petition for review. On April 13, 2021, OUII, Leviton, and
Corning each filed a response to the petitions.
On May 24, 2021, the Commission determined to review the ID in
part. Notice at 3-6 (May 24, 2021) (``Notice of Review''), published at
86 FR 28890-893 (May 28, 2021). Specifically, the Commission determined
to review: (1) The ID's finding that the importation requirement of
section 337 is met with respect to the accused products of Respondents
Leviton, Panduit, and Siemon; (2) the ID's interpretation of the
``width of the front side of [the] fiber optic module'' limitation in
the asserted claims of the '456 patent, and the associated infringement
findings; (3) the ID's construction of ``a front opening'' in the
asserted claims of the '206 patent, and the associated infringement
findings; (4) the ID's finding that Leviton directly infringes the
asserted claims of the '320 and '456 patents; (5) the ID's findings on
indirect infringement of the asserted claims of the '320, '456, and/or
'153 patents by Respondents Leviton, Panduit, FS, and Siemon; and (6)
the ID's finding that Corning has satisfied the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement under section 337(a)(3)(B) and (C). The
Commission solicited briefing on remedy, the public interest, and
bonding, as well as on specific issues concerning importation,
infringement, and the domestic industry requirement.
On June 7, 2021, the parties filed initial submissions in response
to the Commission's Notice of Review. On June 14, 2021, the parties
filed replies to each other's submissions. In addition, the Commission
received comments from the parties on the public interest pursuant to
Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4), 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). The Commission also
received comments from Defaulting Respondents Huber+Suhner AG and Huber
+ Suhner, Inc. in response to the Commission's notice soliciting public
interest comments, 86 FR 22067-68 (Apr. 26, 2021).
Having reviewed the record of the investigation, including the
final ID and the parties' submissions, the Commission has found a
violation of section 337 as to claims 1 and 3 of the '320 patent;
claims 11, 12, 14-16, 19, 21, 27, and 28 of the '456 patent; claims 9,
16, 23, and 26 of the '153 patent; and claims 22 and 23 of the '206
patent. Specifically, the Commission affirms with modifications the
ID's finding that Respondents Leviton, Panduit, and Siemon satisfy the
importation requirement. FS and Wirewerks did not contest importation
before the ALJ. With regard to claim construction, the Commission
determines to: (1) Adopt OUII's proposed construction for the ``width
of the front side of [the] fiber optic module'' limitation in claims 12
and 28 of the '456 patent and find that the accused products meet this
limitation under the proper construction; and (2) adopt Corning's
proposed construction for the ``front opening'' limitation in the
asserted claims of the '206 patent and find that the accused products
meet this limitation under the proper construction. The Commission
affirms with modifications the ID's finding that the imported
article(s) of Respondents Panduit, Siemon, and FS are respectively used
by their customers to directly infringe the asserted claims of the
'320, '456, and '153 patents at their inducement, and the imported
articles of Respondent Leviton are used by its customers to directly
infringe the asserted claims of the '320 and '456 patents at Leviton's
inducement. Further, the Commission affirms the ID's finding of no
contributory infringement by Respondents Leviton, Panduit, and Siemon,
and takes no position on the ID's finding of no contributory
infringement by FS. Still further, the Commission takes no position on
the ID's finding that Leviton directly infringes the asserted claims of
the '320 and '456 patents. Finally, the Commission affirms with
modifications the ID's finding that Corning has satisfied the economic
prong of the domestic industry requirement under section 337(a)(3).
The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is: (1) A
general exclusion order prohibiting the entry of infringing high-
density fiber optic equipment and components thereof; and (2) cease and
desist orders directed to Respondents Leviton, Panduit, and FS. The
Commission has determined that the public interest factors do not
preclude issuance of the general exclusion order or the cease and
desist orders. The Commission has determined that a bond as set forth
in the orders is required during the period of Presidential review. 19
U.S.C. 1337(j)(3).
The investigation is terminated. The Commission's reasoning in
support of its determinations is set forth more fully in its opinion.
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President and
the United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on August 3,
2021.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
part 210.
While temporary remote operating procedures are in place in
response to COVID-19, the Office of the Secretary is not able to serve
parties that have not retained counsel or otherwise provided a point of
contact for electronic service. Accordingly, pursuant to Commission
Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR 201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the
Commission orders that the Complainant complete service for any party/
parties without a method of electronic service noted on the attached
Certificate of Service and shall file proof of service on the
Electronic Document Information System (EDIS).
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 43566]]
Issued: August 3, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-16897 Filed 8-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 9, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.