Notice2021-16625
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2020
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 4, 2021
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) from Canada. The period of review (POR) is August 27, 2018, through April 30, 2020. The review covers forty-one producers or exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise were made at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 147 (Wednesday, August 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41956-41958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16625]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-863]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Canada: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of
No Shipments; 2018-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter
welded pipe (welded pipe) from Canada. The period of review (POR) is
August 27, 2018, through April 30, 2020. The review covers forty-one
producers or exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily
determine that sales of subject merchandise were made at prices below
normal value (NV) during the POR. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable August 4, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Dowling, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1646.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 2, 2019, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on
welded pipe from Canada.\1\ On July 10, 2020, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the
Order, covering 41 producers or exporters of the subject
merchandise.\2\ On August 5, 2020, we selected Evraz Inc. NA \3\ as the
sole mandatory respondent for this administrative review.\4\ On July
22, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by 60
days.\5\ Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce determined that it was not practicable to
complete the preliminary results of this review within 245 days and
extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review by 120
days, until July 30, 2021.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping Duty
Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 41540 (July 10, 2020) (Initiation
Notice).
\3\ In the underlying less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation,
Commerce determined that Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and
the Canadian National Steel Corporation (collectively, Evraz)
comprise a single entity. See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from
Canada: Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019) (Order).
There is no information on this record of this review that requires
reconsideration of this single entity determination.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada, 2018-2020--Respondent
Selection,'' dated August 5, 2020.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,'' dated July 22, 2020.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada:
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 1st Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 10, 2021; see also
Memorandum, ``Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of 1st Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' dated June 28, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a detailed description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at <a href="http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/">http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Diameter
Welded Pipe from Canada; 2018-2020,'' dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this Order is welded pipe from Canada. For a
full description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
One producer and/or exporter under review, Canam (St Gedeon)
(Canam), properly filed a certification reporting that it made no
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\8\ We received no
information from CBP that contradicted Canam's no-shipment
[[Page 41957]]
claim.\9\ Therefore, we preliminarily determine that this company did
not have shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent
with Commerce's practice,\10\ Commerce finds that it is not appropriate
to rescind the review with respect to this company, but rather, to
complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on
the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In the Initiation Notice, this company was listed as Canam
(St Gedeon). However, in its certification of no shipments, it noted
that Canam (St Gedeon) is a plant location and not its legal name.
It also noted that it had recently undergone a corporate
restructuring and is now named Canam Group Inc., which is the
successor entity to Canam Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and
Structures Inc. See Canam's Letter, ``No Shipments Letter for Canam
Group Inc. f/k/a Canam Buildings and Structures Inc.,'' dated August
7, 2020.
\9\ See Memorandum, ``No Shipment Inquiry with Respect to the
Company below during the Period 08/27/2018 through 04/30/2020,''
dated August 20, 2020.
\10\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged
in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306
(August 28, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a) of the Act. Export price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology
underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period of August 27, 2018, through April
30, 2020:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Appendix II.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter or producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evraz Inc. NA............................................... 14.33
Non-Selected Companies Under Review \11\.................... 14.33
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
For the weighted-average dumping margin for non-selected
respondents in an administrative review, generally, Commerce looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Under section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping
margins established for exporters and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins
determined entirely on facts available. We preliminarily calculated a
weighted-average dumping margin for Evraz that was not zero, de
minimis, or based on facts available. Accordingly, we have
preliminarily applied the weighted-average dumping margin calculated
for Evraz as the weighted-average dumping margin for the non-
individually examined companies.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results to parties within five days after public
announcement of the preliminary results.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\13\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case
briefs, may be filed not later than seven days after the date for
filing case briefs.\14\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument:
(1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and
(3) a table of authorities.\15\ Executive summaries should be limited
to five pages total, including footnotes. Case and rebuttal briefs
should be filed using ACCESS \16\ and must be served on interested
parties.\17\ Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its
requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary
information, until further notice.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also Temporary Rule
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006
(March 26, 2020); and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR
41363 (July 10, 2020).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\16\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
\17\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
\18\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time within 30
days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should
contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the
respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is
made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a date and time to be
determined.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP
35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment
instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until
the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
If Evraz's weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis
(i.e., 0.50 percent), upon completion of the final results, Commerce
will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the
ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's
examined sales to the total entered value of sales. Where we do not
have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we
will calculate a per-unit assessment rate by aggregating the
antidumping duties due for all U.S. sales to that importer and dividing
this amount by the total quantity sold to that importer.\19\ To
determine whether the duty assessment rates are de minimis, in
accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we
calculate importer-specific ad valorem ratios based on the estimated
entered value. Where Evraz's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or
de minimis, or an importer-specific ad valorem rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.\20\ For the companies which were not
selected for individual examination, we intend to direct CBP to assess
antidumping duties at a rate equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin determined for Evraz in the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\20\ See 19 CFR 352.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz
for
[[Page 41958]]
which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-
others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
the final results of this review and for future cash deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be that established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the
cash deposit rates will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not covered in this review, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which the company
was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review
or in the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the company-specific rate established for the most
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 12.32 percent, the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\23\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, including the results of its
analysis of issues raised by the parties in the written comments,
within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: July 28, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
V. Rate for Non-Examined Companies
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
Appendix II
Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for
Individual Review
1. Acier Profile SBB Inc
2. Aciers Lague Steels Inc
3. Amdor Inc
4. BPC Services Group
5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing
6. Canada Culvert
7. Canadian National Steel Corp
8. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc
9. CFI Metal Inc
10. Dominion Pipe & Piling
11. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services
12. Fi Oilfield Services Canada
13. Forterra
14. Gchem Ltd
15. Graham Construction
16. Groupe Fordia Inc
17. Grupo Fordia Inc
18. Hodgson Custom Rolling
19. Hyprescon Inc
20. Interpipe Inc
21. K K Recycling Services
22. Kobelt Manufacturing Co
23. Labrie Environment
24. Les Aciers Sofatec
25. Lorenz Conveying P
26. Lorenz Conveying Products
27. Matrix Manufacturing
28. MBI Produits De Forge
29. Nor Arc
30. Peak Drilling Ltd
31. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd
32. Pipe & Piling Supplies
33. Prudental
34. Prudential
35. Shaw Pipe Protecction
36. Shaw Pipe Protection
37. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility
38. Tenaris Prudential
39. Welded Tube of Can Ltd
[FR Doc. 2021-16625 Filed 8-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 4, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.