Rule2021-16448
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of Columbia Codes
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 17, 2021
Effective
August 17, 2021
Issuing agencies
Justice DepartmentParole Commission
Abstract
The United States Parole Commission is revising its regulations to permit a single commissioner to reopen a DC Code case and retard the parole effective date for up to 120 days when the U.S. Parole Commission receives information that the prisoner has committed new disciplinary infractions.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45860-45861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16448]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USPC-2021-02]
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
AGENCY: United States Parole Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Parole Commission is revising its
regulations to permit a single commissioner to reopen a DC Code case
and retard the parole effective date for up to 120 days when the U.S.
Parole Commission receives
[[Page 45861]]
information that the prisoner has committed new disciplinary
infractions.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 17, 2021. Comments due on or
before October 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
number USPC-2021-02 by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
2. Mail: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission,
attention: USPC Rules Group, 90 K Street NE, Washington, DC 20530.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen H. Krapels, General Counsel,
U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC
20530, telephone (202) 346-7030. Questions about this publication are
welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases cannot be answered
over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parole Commission is publishing an interim
rule with a request for comments which would permit a single
commissioner to reopen the case of a parole eligible DC Code offender
and retard the parole effective date for up to 120 days when the
Commission receives information that the prisoner has committed new
disciplinary infractions. Currently, under 28 CFR 2.86(b), two
commissioner votes are needed to take this action. One commissioner can
already reopen and retard a case for up to 120 days without a hearing
for release planning purposes, i.e., to develop a release plan, or
obtain placement in a Residential Re-entry Center, and changing the
procedure to one commissioner is consistent with the voting rules for
U.S. Code sentenced prisoners. This action, as with other decisions to
retard a parole date by a limited period of time without conducting a
hearing, allows the Commission the flexibility to take prompt action to
impose a short sanction for minor misconduct, but conserve the decision
to release the prisoner on parole. With many prisoners transitioning to
the community through Residential Re-entry Centers earlier and more
frequently, there is a benefit to permitting one commissioner to make
the decision to sanction misconduct on the record with minimal
disruption to the release planning process.
The Commission is promulgating this rule as an interim rule and is
providing a 60-day period for public comment. The amended rule will
take effect upon publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulation Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order
13565, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b),
General Principles of Regulation. The Commission has determined that
this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and
accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and
they will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No
action under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle E-
Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E-
Congressional Review Act, now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies. Moreover, this is a rule of agency practice or
procedure that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties, and does not come within the meaning of the term
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
Parole.
The Interim Rule
Accordingly, the U.S. Parole Commission amends 28 CFR part 2 as
follows:
PART 2--[REVISED]
0
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 2 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and 4204(a)(6).
0
2. Revise Sec. 2.86 (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.86 Release on parole; rescission for misconduct.
* * * * *
(b) The Commission may reconsider any grant of parole prior to the
prisoner's actual release on parole, and may advance or retard a parole
effective date or rescind a parole date previously granted based upon
the receipt of any new and significant information concerning the
prisoner including disciplinary infractions. A Commissioner may retard
a parole date for disciplinary infractions (e.g., to permit the use of
graduated sanctions) for up to 120 days without a hearing, in addition
to any retardation ordered under Sec. 2.83(d).
* * * * *
Patricia K. Cushwa,
Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-16448 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 17, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.