Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Public Comment Request; State Annual Long-Term Care Ombudsman Report-National Ombudsman Reporting System; OMB #0985-0005
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Administration for Community Living is announcing that the proposed collection of information listed above has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance as required under section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This 30-Day notice collects comments on the information collection requirements related to the State Annual Long-Term Care Ombudsman Report-National Ombudsman Reporting System [OMB #0985-0005].
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 143 (Thursday, July 29, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 143 (Thursday, July 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40848-40849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16132]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Public Comment Request; State Annual Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Report-National Ombudsman Reporting System; OMB #0985-0005
AGENCY: Administration for Community Living, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration for Community Living is announcing that the
proposed collection of information listed above has been submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance as
required under section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. This 30-Day notice collects comments on the information
collection requirements related to the State Annual Long-Term Care
Ombudsman Report-National Ombudsman Reporting System [OMB #0985-0005].
DATES: Submit written comments on the collection of information by
August 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
<a href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain">www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain</a>. Find the information collection by
selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments''
or by using the search function. By mail to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, New Executive Office Bldg., 725 17th St.
NW, Rm. 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ACL.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louise Ryan, Administration for
Community Living, Washington, DC 20201, (206) 615-2299 or by email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e78b88928e9482c9959e8689a786848bc98f8f94c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="264a49534f554308545f47486647454a084e4e5508414950">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, ACL has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is requesting
approval to collect data for the State Annual Long-Term Care Ombudsman
Report-National Ombudsman Reporting System [OMB #0985-0005]. This
request covers minor changes and corrections to the current information
collection, with a total of 11,154 annual burden hours. The data
collection tool will enhance ACL's ability to understand and report on
Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) program operations, experiences of
long-term care facility residents and will reflect changes in LTCO
program operations and long-term supports and services policies,
research, and practices. States will continue to provide the following
data and narrative information in the report:
1. Numbers and descriptions of cases filed and complaints made on
behalf of long-term care facility residents to the statewide ombudsman
program;
2. Major issues identified impacting on the quality of care and
life of long-term care facility residents;
3. Statewide program operations;
4. Ombudsman activities in addition to complaint investigation; and
5. Organizational conflict of interest reporting as required by 45
CFR part 1324.21.
Comments in Response to the 60-Day Federal Register Notice
A notice was published in the Federal Register on March 10, 2021
(86 FR 13720). There were four public comments received during the 60-
day FRN. Please see ACLs response to comment listed below.
Two of the four respondents (Maryland Ombudsman program and the
National Association of State Ombudsman Programs (NASOP)) recommended
adding a new complaint code ``infection control.''
Response: ACL agrees to add one complaint code ``infection
control'' and corresponding definition, examples and reporting tips.
The Iowa Ombudsman program recommended adding clarifying information to
the Code I05 (Housekeeping) to be inclusive of infection control, ACL
will incorporate its suggestion into the new ``Infection control''
code. Two of the four respondents (Maryland Ombudsman program and
NASOP) recommended changes to the ``examples and reporting tips'' under
complaint code J01.
Response: ACL agrees to modify the ``examples and reporting tips''
on Complaint Code J01 ``Administrative oversight'' to incorporate
problems with a facility planning and responding to an emergency.
ACL received the following comments and did not accept them for
inclusion in NORS.
The Maryland Ombudsman proposed adding more detail and examples in
the description fields in the following cells: S02, S06, S08, S09,
S12.1, and S13 stating that this would give the State Ombudsman more
guidance on how to approach the narratives and to help ensure greater
consistency across the country.
[[Page 40849]]
Response: ACL in coordination with ACL's grantee, the National
Ombudsman Resource Center (NORC) created in-depth training and training
manuals on all aspects of NORS reporting, including examples of
narratives for both complaint examples and systems issues and does not
believe that additional guidance is necessary. See <a href="https://ltcombudsman.org/omb_support/nors">https://ltcombudsman.org/omb_support/nors</a>.
The Maryland Ombudsman program also recommended the addition of a
new complaint code in Facility Policies, Procedures and Practices (Code
J) for emergency planning complaints. The Maryland Ombudsman program
noted that there have been many instances of facilities needing to
temporarily or permanently relocate residents for a variety of reasons
from disasters to lack of appropriate staff in the building, facility
closure, or the facility did not have an appropriate plan or did not
have a plan at all.
Response: ACL will not add a new complaint code, but will modify
complaint code J01 ``Administrative Oversight'' to be inclusive of
emergency planning.
One recommendation was to include the addition of a county field
(e.g., Federal Information Processing Standard code). The commenter
noted that although looking at differences/variation between states is
important and valuable, having the ability to look at differences/
variation within each state would be immensely beneficial for the
conduct of ACL's functions and would allow for analytics to be shared
with state ombudsmen and other programs nationwide.
Response: ACL does not accept this recommendation because of the
level of burden necessary to gather and report this level of data.
NASOP made recommendations to broaden the types of activities
reported on systems issues work performed by the State Long-Term
Ombudsman, the Office and local Ombudsman entities. NASOP asserts that
this reporting element would provide needed depth and clarity about
whether a State Long-Term Care Ombudsman has the necessary independence
and resources to perform systems advocacy as required by the Older
Americans Act. NASOP proposes that data collected as narrative examples
of Systems Issues is insufficient and does not have practical utility
without additional data collection to explain the scope of a state's
work on systems advocacy. ``By only collecting two examples of a
systems issue from each state, ACL has no objective means of
determining a state's compliance with the Act nor the independence of
the Office. With our proposed addition data collection in Table 3, ACL
will collect and provide the public with a more accurate picture of
whether a state program is fulfilling the requirements of the Act.''
Response: ACL does not agree with NASOP's assessment of the current
data collection on systems advocacy for several reasons. First, the FY
2020 data is not yet final and ACL has not been able to share systems
advocacy data. Additionally, while NORS is one part of measuring
program effectiveness it is not the only way that ACL determines
compliance with the Older Americans Act. ACL provides continuous
technical assistance on matters of compliance, conducted in-depth
review of states compliance with the Ombudsman program regulation, and
worked with states to develop compliance plans. ACL also has an on-
going project to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ombudsman program
and has gathered in-depth data on both state and local level Ombudsman
program's ability to conduct systemic advocacy. See <a href="https://acl.gov/programs/program-evaluations-and-reports">https://acl.gov/programs/program-evaluations-and-reports</a>. In addition, the proposed
data collection would be very burdensome on state and local programs to
collect and report because the two recommended data elements include a
sub-set of 10 possible elements to select and to keep track of the
number of instances of each sub-set ultimately resulting in 20 new data
elements. This type of data would not add meaningful information that
would benefit ACL considering the level of effort required of states to
train on this type of data collection, adapt software and report.
Estimated Program Burden
ACL estimates the burden associated with this collection of
information as follows: Approximately 11,154 hours, with 52 state
Ombudsman programs responding annually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Hours per Annual burden
Respondent/data collection activity respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 52 1 214.5 11,154
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: July 23, 2021.
Alison Barkoff,
Acting Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 2021-16132 Filed 7-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.