Agency Information Collection Proposed Extension
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
EIA invites public comment on the proposed three-year extension, with changes, to the Generic Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research, as required under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. EIA-882T, Generic Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research, provides EIA with the authority to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of data collected on EIA's surveys. EIA uses EIA-882T to meet its obligation to publish, and otherwise make available independent, high-quality statistical data to federal government agencies, state and local governments, the energy industry, researchers, and the general public.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38327-38328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection Proposed Extension
AGENCY: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EIA invites public comment on the proposed three-year
extension, with changes, to the Generic Clearance for Questionnaire
Testing, Evaluation, and Research, as required under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. EIA-882T, Generic Clearance for Questionnaire
Testing, Evaluation, and Research, provides EIA with the authority to
utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to pretest
questionnaires and validate the quality of data collected on EIA's
surveys. EIA uses EIA-882T to meet its obligation to publish, and
otherwise make available independent, high-quality statistical data to
federal government agencies, state and local governments, the energy
industry, researchers, and the general public.
DATES: EIA must receive all comments on this proposed information
collection no later than September 20, 2021. If you anticipate any
difficulties in submitting your comments by the deadline, contact the
person listed in the ADDRESSES section of this notice as soon as
possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically to Gerson Morales by email at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a3d1f08091514543715081b161f093a1f131b541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="26614354554948086b4954474a435566434f4708414950">[email protected]</span></a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerson Morales, U.S. Energy
Information Administration, telephone (202) 586-7077, or by email at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51163423223e3f7f1c3e23303d3422113438307f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d4a687f7e62632340627f6c61687e4d68646c236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request
contains:
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0186;
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Generic Clearance for
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research;
(3) Type of Request: Three-year extension with changes;
(4) Purpose: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is
requesting a three-year approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to
pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of the data that is
collected on EIA and DOE survey forms. Through the use of these
methodologies, EIA will conduct research studies to improve the quality
of energy data being collected, reduce or minimize survey respondent
burden, and increase agency efficiency. This authority would also allow
EIA to improve data collection in order to meet the needs of EIA's
customers while also staying current in the evolving nature of the
energy industry.
The specific methods proposed for the coverage by this clearance
are described below. Also outlined is the legal authority for these
voluntary information gathering activities.
The following methods are proposed:
Pilot Surveys. Pilot surveys conducted under this clearance will
generally be methodological studies, and will always employ
statistically representative samples. The pilot surveys will replicate
all components of the methodological design, sampling procedures (where
possible), and questionnaires of the full scale survey. Pilot surveys
will normally be utilized when EIA undertakes a complete redesign of a
particular data collection methodology or when EIA undertakes data
collection in new energy areas, such as HGL production, alternative
fueled motor vehicles, and other emerging areas of the energy sector
where data collection would provide utility to EIA.
Cognitive Interviews. Cognitive interviews are typically one-on-one
interviews in which the respondent is usually asked to ``think aloud''
or is asked ``retrospective questions'' as he or she answers questions,
reads survey materials, defines terminology, or completes other
activities as part of a typical survey process. A number of different
techniques may be involved including, asking respondents what specific
words or phrases mean or asking respondents probing questions to
determine how they estimate, calculate, or determine specific data
elements on a survey. The objectives of these cognitive interviews are
to identify problems of ambiguity or misunderstanding, examine the
process that respondents follow for reporting information, assess
survey respondents' ability to report new information, or identify
other difficulties respondents have answering survey questions in order
to reduce measurement error from estimates based on a survey.
Respondent Debriefings. Respondent debriefings conducted under this
clearance will generally be methodological or cognitive research
studies. The debriefing form is administered after a respondent
completes a questionnaire either in paper format, electronically, or
through in-person interviews. The debriefings contain probing questions
to determine how respondents interpret the survey questions, how much
time and effort was spent completing the questionnaire, and whether
they have problems in completing the survey/questionnaire. Respondent
debriefings also are useful in determining potential issues with data
quality and in estimating respondent burden.
Usability Testing. Usability tests are similar to cognitive
interviews in which a respondent is typically asked to ``think aloud''
or asked ``retrospective questions'' as he or she reviews an electronic
questionnaire, website, visual aid, or hard copy survey form. The
objective of usability testing is to check that respondents can easily
and intuitively navigate electronic survey collection programs,
websites, and other survey instruments to submit their data to EIA.
Focus Groups. Focus groups, in person, online, or by phone, involve
group sessions guided by a moderator who follows a topic guide
containing questions or subjects focused on a particular issue rather
than adhering to
[[Page 38328]]
a standardized cognitive interview protocol. Focus groups are useful
for exploring issues concerning the design of a form and the meaning of
terms from a specific group of respondents, data users, or other
stakeholders of EIA data. Focus groups may also be used to explore
respondents' general opinions about data collection technologies or
survey materials other than questionnaires.
(4a) Proposed Changes to Information Collection:
EIA proposes to add several other methodologies or techniques to
improve survey design, pretest questionnaires and validate the quality
of the data that is collected on EIA and DOE survey forms.
Field Techniques. Field techniques described in survey research and
survey methodology literature will be employed as appropriate. These
include follow-up probing, memory cue tasks, paraphrasing, confidence
rating, response latency measurements, free and dimensional sort
classification tasks, and vignette classifications. The objective of
all of these techniques is to aid in the development of surveys that
work with respondents' thought processes, thus reducing response error
and burden. These techniques have also proven useful for studying and
revising pre-existing questionnaires.
Behavior Coding. Behavior coding is a quantitative technique in
which a standard set of codes is systematically applied to respondent/
interviewer interactions in interviewer-administered surveys or
respondent/questionnaire interactions in self-administered surveys. The
advantage of this technique is that it can identify and quantify
problems with the wording or ordering of questions, but the
disadvantage is that it does not necessarily illuminate the underlying
causes.
Split Panel Test. Split panel tests refer to controlled
experimental testing of alternative hypotheses. Thus, they allow one to
choose from among competing questions, questionnaires, definitions,
error messages or survey improvement methodologies with greater
confidence than any of the other methods. Split panel tests conducted
during the fielding of the survey are superior in that they can support
both internal validity (controlled comparisons of the variable(s) under
investigation) and external validity (represent the population under
study). Most of the previously mentioned survey improvement methods can
be strengthened when teamed with this method.
(5) Annual Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,800;
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: 1,800;
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 2,200;
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
$179,630 (2,200 annual burden hours multiplied by $81.65 per hour). EIA
estimates that respondents will have no additional costs associated
with the surveys other than the burden hours and the maintenance of the
information during the normal course of business.
Comments are invited on whether or not: (a) The proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of agency
functions, including whether the information will have a practical
utility; (b) EIA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used, is accurate; (c) EIA can improve the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information it will collect; and (d) EIA can minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, such as
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Statutory Authority: 15 U.S.C. 772(b) and 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 14th, 2021.
Samson A. Adeshiyan,
Director, Office of Statistical Methods and Research, U.S. Energy
Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2021-15360 Filed 7-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.