Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Standardized Bycatch Reporting Methodology Amendments to the Fishery Management Plans for the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs, Scallops, and Salmon
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) submitted Amendment 51 to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands (BSAI) King and Tanner Crabs (Crab FMP), Amendment 17 to the FMP for the Scallop Fishery Off Alaska (Scallop FMP), and Amendment 15 to the FMP for the Salmon Fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Off Alaska (Salmon FMP) (collectively Amendments). If approved, these Amendments would add to or modify language in the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs to more transparently reflect and align the FMPs with the way bycatch is currently reported in the fisheries managed by the Council. These Amendments are intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act); the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs; and other applicable laws.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 112 (Monday, June 14, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 112 (Monday, June 14, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31474-31476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12373]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[RTID 0648-XA980]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Standardized
Bycatch Reporting Methodology Amendments to the Fishery Management
Plans for the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs,
Scallops, and Salmon
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of availability of fishery management plan
amendments; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council)
submitted Amendment 51 to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Bering
Sea/Aleutian Islands (BSAI) King and Tanner Crabs (Crab FMP), Amendment
17 to the FMP for the Scallop Fishery Off Alaska (Scallop FMP), and
Amendment 15 to the FMP for the Salmon Fisheries in the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) Off Alaska (Salmon FMP) (collectively Amendments).
If approved, these Amendments would add to or modify language in the
Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs to more transparently reflect and align
the FMPs with the way bycatch is currently reported in the fisheries
managed by the Council. These Amendments are intended to promote the
goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act); the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon
FMPs; and other applicable laws.
DATES: Comments on the Amendments must be received no later than August
13, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2021-0036, by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and enter NOAA-NMFS-2021-0036 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
<bullet> Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
[[Page 31475]]
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Records Office. Mail comments to
P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of proposed Amendments, the draft Categorical
Exclusion, and the draft Analysis (referred to as the ``Analysis'')
prepared for this action may be obtained from <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> or
from the NMFS Alaska Region website at <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan Mackey, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that each
regional fishery management council submit any FMP amendment it
prepares to NMFS for review and approval, disapproval, or partial
approval by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary). The Magnuson-Stevens
Act also requires that NMFS, upon receiving an FMP amendment,
immediately publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing that
the amendment is available for public review and comment. The Council
has submitted the Amendments to the Secretary for review. This notice
announces that the proposed Amendments are available for public review
and comment.
NMFS manages the crab, scallop, and salmon fisheries in Alaska's
exclusive economic zone under the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs. The
Council prepared these FMPs under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and
implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR parts 600, 679, and 680.
Section 303(a)(11) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that any
FMP establish a standardized bycatch reporting methodology (SBRM) to
assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery, and
include conservation and management measures that, to the extent
practicable and in the following priority--(A) minimize bycatch, and
(B) minimize the mortality of bycatch that cannot be avoided (16 U.S.C.
1853(a)(11)).
On January 19, 2017, NMFS published a final rule (82 FR 6317)
establishing national guidance for compliance with this requirement. As
required by 50 CFR 600.1610(b), regional fishery management councils,
in coordination with NMFS, must review their FMPs and make any
necessary changes so all FMPs are consistent with the guidance by
February 21, 2022.
The national guidance, codified at 50 CFR 600.1605(a), defines a
SBRM as ``an established, consistent procedure or procedures used to
collect, record, and report bycatch data in a fishery.'' This
information, in conjunction with other relevant sources, is used to
assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery and
inform the development of conservation and management measures to
minimize bycatch. The regulations require that an FMP identify the
required procedure that constitutes the SBRM for the fishery and
explain how the procedure meets the purpose to collect, record, and
report bycatch data.
The SBRM final rule requires the Council to explain how the SBRMs
meet the stated purpose in the rule based on an analysis of four
considerations: (1) Characteristics of bycatch in the fishery, (2) the
feasibility of the reporting methodology, (3) the uncertainty of data
resulting from the methodology, and (4) how the data will be used to
assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery (50 CFR
600.1610(a)). The Council must address these considerations when
reviewing or establishing an SBRM.
In February 2020, the Council received a report on current FMPs
managed by the Council and their consistency with the SBRM final rule.
At that meeting, the Council determined that the FMPs for Groundfish of
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area, Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska, and Fish Resources of the Arctic Management Area were
in compliance with the SBRM final rule. The Council also determined
that the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs needed to be updated to
explicitly identify the SBRMs to be consistent with the SBRM final rule
and should therefore be amended.
The Council took final action at its February 2021 meeting. In
taking final action, the Council noted that changes to the Crab,
Scallop, and Salmon FMPs were necessary to ensure those FMPs are
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the SBRM final rule.
During deliberation, the Council recognized that the Crab, Scallop, and
Salmon FMPs currently contain management measures such as the State's
Scallop and Crab Observer Programs, industry reports, and fish tickets
that provide SBRMs consistent with the national guidance. However,
these are not explicitly identified as the SBRM in each FMP.
The Council recommended the three FMPs be amended to explicitly
state the SBRMs and explain how they meet the purpose of collecting,
recording, and reporting bycatch data. The Council also noted that the
descriptions of the management measures that contribute to the SBRM
(such as the Crab Observer Program) may be a bit outdated. These
management measures may be updated as the FMPs are amended by this
action, and any such updates will be consistent with the SBRM
regulations and be done in coordination with the State. Updates to the
language of management measures for SBRM consistency would not add any
new reporting requirements.
This proposed action would not add any new reporting requirements
and would not change any regulatory requirements. This action would
only add to or modify language in the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs to
more transparently reflect and align with how bycatch is currently
reported in the fisheries managed by the Council by explicitly stating
the SBRM in each fishery.
Crab FMP
The combination of the Crab Observer Program and industry reports
provides a standard reporting methodology that is consistent with the
SBRM final rule. Descriptions of these management measures currently
exist in the Crab FMP; however, the FMP needs to be amended to
explicitly identify these methodologies as the SBRM. Amendment 51 to
the Crab FMP would add language to Sections 8.1.2, 8.3.1, and 8.3.7 to
identify the existing SBRM and to explain how it meets the purpose of
collecting, recording, and reporting bycatch.
Scallop FMP
The combination of industry reports and the Scallop Observer
Program provides a standard reporting methodology that is consistent
with the SBRM final rule. Descriptions of these management measures
currently exist in the Scallop FMP; however, the FMP needs to be
amended to explicitly identify these methodologies as the SBRM.
Amendment 17 to the Scallop FMP would add language to Section 3.2.12 to
identify the SBRM and explain
[[Page 31476]]
how it meets the purpose of collecting, recording, and reporting
bycatch.
Salmon FMP
Fish tickets are the standardized reporting methodology in place
for reporting catch of salmon species that are subject to maximum
retainable amounts. The Statewide Harvest Survey and creel surveys, as
well as the Saltwater Guide Logbooks, are the standardized reporting
methodology in place for reporting in the salmon sport fishery and the
guided sport fishery. However, the Salmon FMP needs to be amended in
order to explicitly identify these methodologies as the SBRM. Amendment
15 to the Salmon FMP would add language to Section 8.1.8 (Bycatch
Management) to identify the SBRM and explain how it meets the purpose
of collecting, recording, and reporting bycatch in the directed
commercial salmon fishery. In addition, Amendment 15 would add language
to Section 8.1.9 (Sport Fisheries) to identify the SBRM for the salmon
sport fishery.
NMFS is soliciting public comments on the proposed Amendments
through the end of the comment period (see DATES). All relevant written
comments received by the end of the applicable comment period will be
considered by NMFS in the approval/partial approval/disapproval
decision for the Amendments and addressed in the response to comments
in the final decision. Comments received after the end of the
applicable comment period will not be considered in the approval/
disapproval decision on the Amendments. To be considered, comments must
be received, not just postmarked or otherwise transmitted, by the last
day of the comment period (see DATES).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 8, 2021.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-12373 Filed 6-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.