Notice2021-11850
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention Involving Malaysia
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 7, 2021
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE), completed in Malaysia, using carbon hot-rolled steel (HRS) and/or cold-rolled steel (CRS) flat products (substrate) manufactured in Taiwan, are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) order on CORE from Taiwan.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30257-30260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11850]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-856]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan:
Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention Involving Malaysia
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports
of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE), completed in
Malaysia, using carbon hot-rolled steel (HRS) and/or cold-rolled steel
(CRS) flat products (substrate) manufactured in Taiwan, are
circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) order on CORE from Taiwan.
DATES: Applicable June 7, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang, AD/CVD Operations, Office
III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1168.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 18, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination \1\ of circumvention of the Taiwan CORE Order.\2\ A
summary of events that occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues
raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/">http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan:
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Circumvention Involving
Malaysia, 85 FR 8815 (February 18, 2020) (Preliminary
Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016) (Taiwan CORE Order).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for Anti-
Circumvention Inquiry involving Taiwan on the Antidumping Duty Order
on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are certain flat-rolled steel
products, either clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-resistant
metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-
based alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted, varnished,
laminated, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in
addition to the metallic coating. For a complete description of the
scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Scope of the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
This anti-circumvention inquiry covers CORE completed in Malaysia
from HRS and/or CRS substrate input manufactured in Taiwan and
subsequently exported to the United States (merchandise subject to this
inquiry). This final ruling applies to all shipments of merchandise
subject to this inquiry entered on or after the date of the initiation
of this inquiry.\4\ Importers and exporters of CORE produced in
Malaysia using: (1) HRS manufactured in Malaysia or other third
countries, (2) CRS manufactured in Malaysia using HRS produced in
Malaysia or other third countries, or (3) CRS manufactured in other
third countries, must certify that the HRS and/or CRS processed into
CORE in Malaysia did not originate in Taiwan, as provided for in the
certifications attached to this Federal Register notice. Otherwise,
their merchandise will be subject to AD requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's
Republic of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiries on the
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 FR 43585 (August
21, 2019) (Initiation Notice), and accompanying Memorandum,
``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's
Republic of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiries on the
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders,'' dated August 12,
2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this anti-circumvention inquiry in
accordance with section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Because certain interested parties did not cooperate to the
best of their abilities in responding to Commerce's requests for
[[Page 30258]]
information, we continue to base parts of our final determination on
the facts available, with adverse inferences, pursuant to sections
776(a) and (b) of the Act. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum contains
a full description of the methodology.\5\ We incorporate by reference
this description of the methodology for our final determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the
Anti-Circumvention Inquiries of the Antidumping Duty and
Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from Taiwan,'' dated February 7, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this inquiry are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested
parties, we made no revisions to the Preliminary Determination with
regard to our analysis under the anti-circumvention factors of section
781(b) of the Act.\6\ We have made certain changes to the language in
the certifications to provide guidance on who should complete the
exporter certification, and to allow importers and exporters to clearly
identify the parties involved in the sale(s) involving the export to
the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ We made certain adjustments to our calculations with respect
to certain prongs of the analysis for CSC Steel Sdn. Bhd. (CSCM), a
cooperative mandatory respondent in this inquiry, based on revisions
provided in a post-preliminary response from the respondent. See
Memorandum, ``Anti-Circumvention Inquiry of the Antidumping Duty
Order of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan:
China Steel Sdn. Bhd.--Final Analysis Memorandum,'' dated
concurrently with this memorandum (CSCM Final Analysis Memorandum).
However, we note that as the updated information does not result in
material changes to the calculations from the Preliminary
Determination, the conclusions of the analysis from the Preliminary
Determination remain unchanged. See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention
We determine that exports to the United States of CORE completed in
Malaysia from HRS and/or CRS substrate manufactured in Taiwan are
circumventing the Taiwan CORE Order. We therefore find it appropriate
to determine that merchandise subject to this inquiry should be
considered to be within the scope of the Taiwan CORE Order, and to
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of any entries of CORE completed in Malaysia using
HRS and/or CRS substrate manufactured in Taiwan.
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
As stated above, Commerce has made an affirmative determination of
circumvention of the Taiwan CORE Order by exports to the United States
of CORE completed in Malaysia using Taiwanese-origin HRS and/or CRS
substrate. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.225(1)(3), Commerce will
direct CBP to continue to suspend liquidation and to require a cash
deposit of estimated duties on unliquidated entries of CORE completed
in Malaysia using Taiwanese-origin HRS and/or CRS substrate that were
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
August 12, 2019, the date of initiation of this anti-circumvention
inquiry. The suspension of liquidation and cash deposit instructions
will remain in effect until further notice.
CORE produced in Malaysia from HRS or CRS substrate that is not of
Taiwanese-origin is not subject to this inquiry. However, imports of
such merchandise are subject to certification requirements, and cash
deposits may be required if the certification requirements are not
satisfied. Additionally, CORE completed in Malaysia from HRS and/or CRS
from China also has been found to be circumventing the AD/CVD orders on
CORE from China and such merchandise is subject to similar
certification requirements.\7\ Accordingly, if an importer imports CORE
from Malaysia and claims that the CORE was not produced from HRS and/or
CRS substrate manufactured in Taiwan, in order not to be subject to AD
and/or CVD requirements, the importer and exporter are required to meet
the certification and documentation requirements described in
Appendices II, III and IV, in order for cash deposits pursuant to the
Taiwan CORE Order not to be required. The party that made the sale to
the United States should fill out the exporter certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See unpublished Federal Register notice, ``Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of
China: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention Involving
Malaysia,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the situation where no certification is provided for an entry,
and AD/CVD orders on CORE from China or the AD order on CORE from
Taiwan potentially apply to that entry, Commerce intends to instruct
CBP to suspend liquidation of the entry and collect cash deposits at
the rates applicable to the China CORE Orders (i.e., the AD rate
established for the China-wide entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD rate
established for all-other Chinese producers/exporters (39.05
percent)).\8\ This is to prevent evasion, given that the rates
applicable to the AD/CVD orders on CORE from China are higher than the
all-others rate established by the AD order on CORE from Taiwan. In the
situation where a certification is provided for the AD/CVD orders on
CORE from China (stating that the merchandise was not produced from HRS
and/or CRS from China), but no other certification is provided, then
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash
deposits at the AD all-others rate applicable under the AD order on
CORE from Taiwan (i.e., 3.66 percent).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Flat Products from
India, Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea,
and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July
25, 2016); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
India, Italy, Republic of Korea, and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016)
(collectively, China CORE Orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, for this final determination, we continue to determine
that the following non-responsive companies are not eligible for the
certification process: Hsin Kuang Steel Co Ltd; FIW Steel Sdn Bhd; NS
BlueScope Malaysia Sdn Bhd; and YKGI/Yung Kong Galv. Ind/Starshine
Holdings Sdn Bhd/ASTEEL Sdn Bhd (collectively, non-responsive
companies).\9\ Accordingly, importers of CORE from Malaysia produced
and/or exported by these ineligible companies are similarly ineligible
for the certification process with regard to their imports of CORE
produced by or sourced from these companies. Additionally, exporters
are not eligible to certify shipments of merchandise produced by the
above-listed companies. Accordingly, CBP shall suspend the entry and
collect cash deposits for entries of merchandise produced and/or
exported by non-responsive companies at the AD rate established for the
China-wide entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD rate established for all
other Chinese producers and/or exporters (39.05 percent) pursuant to
the China CORE Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Preliminary Determination, 85 FR at 8816, and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 8 and 22-23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice will serve as the only reminder to all parties subject
to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance
[[Page 30259]]
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f).
Dated: June 1, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Scope of the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
V. Verification
VI. Use of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference
VII. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
VIII. Statutory Framework
IX. Statutory Analysis
X. Discussion of the Issues
Comment: Whether CSCM's Manufacturing Operations in Malaysia
Constitute Circumvention Under the Statutory Criteria Established in
Section 781(b)(2) of the Act
XI. Recommendation
Appendix II--Certification Requirements
If an importer imports certain corrosion-resistant steel
products (CORE) from Malaysia and claims that the CORE was not
produced from hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate
(substrate) manufactured in Taiwan, the importer is required to
complete and maintain the importer certification attached hereto as
Appendix III and all supporting documentation. Where the importer
uses a broker to facilitate the entry process, it should obtain the
entry summary number from the broker. Agents of the importer, such
as brokers, however, are not permitted to make this certification on
behalf of the importer.
The exporter of such merchandise is required to complete and
maintain the exporter certification, attached as Appendix IV, and is
further required to provide the importer a copy of that
certification and all supporting documentation. The party that made
the sale to the United States should fill out the exporter
certification.
For any such certifications completed on the date of publication
of this final determination through 20 days after the date of
publication, exporters and importers should use the certifications
attached to the Preliminary Determination. For any such
certifications completed on or after 21 days after the date of
publication of this final determination, exporters and importers
should use the certifications contained below that have changed from
the certifications issued with the Preliminary Determination.
For entries on or after the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register, for which certifications are required,
importers should complete the required certification at or prior to
the date of entry summary, and exporters should complete the
required certification and provide it to the importer at or prior to
the date of shipment. For all such entries made within the first 20
days after publication of this notice, exporters and importers
should use the certifications attached to the Preliminary
Determination. For all entries made on or after 21 days after
publication of this notice, exporters and importers should use the
certifications contained below that have changed from the
certifications issued with the Preliminary Determination.
The importer and exporter are also required to maintain
sufficient documentation supporting their certifications. The
importer will not be required to submit the certifications or
supporting documentation to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
as part of the entry process at this time. However, the importer and
the exporter will be required to present the certifications and
supporting documentation to Commerce and/or CBP, as applicable, upon
request by the respective agency. Additionally, the claims made in
the certifications and any supporting documentation are subject to
verification by Commerce and/or CBP. The importer and exporter are
required to maintain the certifications and supporting documentation
for the later of: (1) A period of five years from the date of entry
or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of any
litigation in United States courts regarding such entries.
In the situation where no certification is provided for an
entry, and AD/CVD orders on CORE from China or the AD order on CORE
from Taiwan potentially apply to that entry, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the
rate under the China CORE Orders (i.e., the AD rate established for
the China-wide entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD rate established
for all-other Chinese producers/exporters (39.05 percent)).\10\ In
the situation where a certification is provided for the AD/CVD
orders on CORE from China (stating that the merchandise was not
produced from HRS and/or CRS from China), but no other certification
is provided, then Commerce intends to instruct CBP to suspend the
entry and collect cash deposits at the AD all-others rate applicable
to the AD order on CORE from Taiwan (i.e., 3.66 percent).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See China CORE Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix III--Importer Certification
I hereby certify that:
(A) My name is {IMPORTING COMPANY OFFICIAL'S NAME{time} and I
am an official of {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} , located at
{ADRESS OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} .
(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the facts regarding the
importation into the Customs territory of the United States of the
corrosion resistant steel products produced in Malaysia that entered
under entry number(s), identified below, and which are covered by
this certification. ``Direct personal knowledge'' refers to facts
the certifying party is expected to have in its own records. For
example, the importer should have direct personal knowledge of the
importation of the product (e.g., the name of the exporter) in its
records.
(C) If the importer is acting on behalf of the first U.S.
customer, complete this paragraph, if not put ``NA'' at the end of
this paragraph:
The corrosion resistant steel products covered by this
certification were imported by {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} on
behalf of {NAME OF U.S. CUSTOMER{time} , located at {ADDRESS OF U.S.
CUSTOMER{time} .
(D) The corrosion resistant steel products covered by this
certification were shipped to {NAME OF PARTY TO WHOM MERCHANDISE WAS
FIRST SHIPPED IN THE UNITED STATES{time} , located at {ADDRESS OF
SHIPMENT{time} .
(E) I have personal knowledge of the facts regarding the
production of the corrosion resistant steel products identified
below. ``Personal knowledge'' includes facts obtained from another
party (e.g., correspondence received by the importer (or exporter)
from the producer regarding the country of manufacture of the
imported products).
(F) The corrosion resistant steel products covered by this
certification were not manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or
cold-rolled steel substrate produced in Taiwan.
(G) This certification applies to the following entries (repeat
this block as many times as necessary):
Entry Summary #:
Entry Summary Line Item #:
Foreign Seller:
Foreign Seller's address:
Foreign Seller's Invoice #:
Foreign Seller's Invoice Line Item #:
Producer:
Producer's Address:
(H) I understand that {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} is
required to maintain a copy of this certification and sufficient
documentation supporting this certification (i.e., documents
maintained in the normal course of business, or documents obtained
by the certifying party, for example, mill certificates, production
records, invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of five
years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years after
the conclusion of any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries.
(I) I understand that {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} is
required to provide this certification and supporting records, upon
request, to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or the
Department of Commerce (Commerce).
(J) I understand that {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} is
required to maintain a copy of the exporter's certification
(attesting to the production and/or export of the imported
merchandise identified above), and any supporting records provided
by the exporter to the importer, for the later of: (1) A period of
five years from the date of entry
[[Page 30260]]
or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of any
litigation in United States courts regarding such entries.
(K) I understand that {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} is
required, upon request, to provide a copy of the exporter's
certification and any supporting records provided by the exporter to
the importer, to CBP and/or Commerce.
(L) I understand that the claims made herein, and the
substantiating documentation, are subject to verification by CBP
and/or Commerce.
(M) I understand that failure to maintain the required
certifications, and/or failure to substantiate the claims made
herein, and/or failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to verify the
claims made herein, may result in a de facto determination that all
entries to which this certification applies are within the scope of
the antidumping/countervailing duty order on corrosion resistant
steel products from Taiwan. I understand that such finding will
result in:
(i) Suspension of liquidation of all unliquidated entries (and
entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these
requirements were not met;
(ii) the requirement that the importer post applicable
antidumping duty and/or countervailing duty cash deposits (as
appropriate) equal to the rates determined by Commerce; and
(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} 's
privilege to certify future imports of corrosion resistant steel
products from Malaysia as not manufactured using hot-rolled steel
and/or cold-rolled steel substrate from Taiwan.
(N) I understand that agents of the importer, such as brokers,
are not permitted to make this certification.
(O) This certification was completed at or prior to the date of
entry summary.
(P) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited to, 18
U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who knowingly
and willfully make material false statements to the U.S. government.
Signature
NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
Appendix IV--Exporter Certification
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: The party that made the sale to the United
States should fill out the exporter certification.
I hereby certify that:
(A) My name is {COMPANY OFFICIAL'S NAME{time} and I am an
official of {NAME OF COMPANY{time} , located at {ADDRESS{time} ;
(B) I have direct personal knowledge of the facts regarding the
production and exportation of the corrosion resistant steel products
identified below. ``Direct personal knowledge'' refers to facts the
certifying party is expected to have in its own books and records.
For example, an exporter should have direct personal knowledge of
the producer's identity and location.
(C) The corrosion resistant steel products produced in Malaysia
and covered by this certification were not manufactured using hot-
rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate produced in Taiwan.
(D) This certification applies to the following sales to {NAME
OF U.S. CUSTOMER{time} , located at {ADDRESS OF U.S.
CUSTOMER{time} . (repeat this block as many times as necessary):
Foreign Seller's Invoice # to U.S. Customer:
Foreign Seller's Invoice to U.S. Customer Line item #:
Producer Name:
Producer's Address:
Producer's Invoice # to Foreign Seller: (If the foreign seller and
the producer are the same party, put NA here.)
(E) The corrosion resistant steel products covered by this
certification were shipped to {NAME OF U.S. PARTY TO WHOM
MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED{time} , located at {U.S. ADDRESS TO WHICH
MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED{time} .
(F) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY{time} is
required to maintain a copy of this certification and sufficient
documentation supporting this certification (i.e., documents
maintained in the normal course of business, or documents obtained
by the certifying party, for example, mill certificates, production
records, invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of five
years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years after
the conclusion of any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries.
(G) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY{time} must
provide a copy of this Exporter Certification to the U.S. importer
by the date of shipment;
(H) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY{time} is
required to provide a copy of this certification and supporting
records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
and/or the Department of Commerce (Commerce).
(I) I understand that the claims made herein, and the
substantiating documentation, are subject to verification by CBP
and/or Commerce.
(J) I understand that failure to maintain the required
certification, and/or failure to substantiate the claims made
herein, and/or failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to verify the
claims made herein, may result in a de facto determination that all
sales to which this certification applies are within the scope of
the antidumping/countervailing duty order on corrosion resistant
steel products from Taiwan. I understand that such finding will
result in:
(i) Suspension of all unliquidated entries (and entries for
which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements
were not met; and
(ii) the requirement that the importer post applicable
antidumping duty and/or countervailing duty cash deposits (as
appropriate) equal to the rates as determined by Commerce; and
(iii) the revocation of {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY{time} 's
privilege to certify future exports of corrosion resistant steel
products from Malaysia as not manufactured using hot-rolled steel
and/or cold-rolled steel substrate from Taiwan.
(K) This certification was completed at or prior to the date of
shipment.
(L) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited to, 18
U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who knowingly
and willfully make material false statements to the U.S. government.
Signature
NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
[FR Doc. 2021-11850 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 7, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.