Rule2021-11769
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Two Revised Sulfur Dioxide Rules for Lake County
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 7, 2021
Effective
July 7, 2021
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to the Indiana sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) State Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of Indiana has requested these SIP revisions to satisfy the requirements of a Federal consent decree. These revisions limit annual bypass venting limits in the sulfur- containing waste gas emissions from a coking and power generating facility in Lake County, Indiana, which is owned and operated by Indiana Harbor Coke Company (IHCC) and Cokenergy LLC (Cokenergy). The revisions also require Cokenergy to operate and maintain a permanent SO<INF>2</INF> flow rate monitor and improve the percent control capture efficiency of the facility. In addition, the rulemaking includes technical corrections and clarifications that do not have a substantive effect of the application of the rules.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 86 Issue 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30201-30203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11769]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2020-0369; FRL-10024-65-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Two Revised Sulfur Dioxide Rules for
Lake County
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
revisions to the Indiana sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The State of Indiana has requested these SIP
revisions to satisfy the requirements of a Federal consent decree.
These revisions limit annual bypass venting limits in the sulfur-
containing waste gas emissions from a coking and power generating
facility in Lake County, Indiana, which is owned and operated by
Indiana Harbor Coke Company (IHCC) and Cokenergy LLC (Cokenergy). The
revisions also require Cokenergy to operate and maintain a permanent
SO<INF>2</INF> flow rate monitor and improve the percent control
capture efficiency of the facility. In addition, the rulemaking
includes technical corrections and clarifications that do not have a
substantive effect of the application of the rules.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2020-0369. All documents in the docket are listed on
the <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
[[Page 30202]]
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either through
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> or at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region
5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures
due to COVID-19. We recommend that you telephone Andrew Lee, Physical
Scientist, at (312) 353-7645 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Lee, Physical Scientist,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-7645,
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#38545d5d1659565c4a5d4f165b785d4859165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="59353c3c7738373d2b3c2e773a193c2938773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
I. Background Information
On February 11, 2021, EPA proposed to approve revisions to 326
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 7-4.1-7 (Cokenergy) and 326 IAC 7-
4.1-8 (IHCC) to limit annual bypass venting of sulfur containing waste
gases from a coking and power generating facility owned and operated by
Indiana Harbor Coke Company and Cokenergy LLC in Lake County, Indiana.
See 86 FR 9038. The proposed revision for Cokenergy also requires it to
operate and maintain a permanent SO<INF>2</INF> flow rate monitor at
the facility. The state of Indiana has requested these SIP revisions to
satisfy the requirements of a Federal consent decree. An explanation of
the Clean Air Act requirements, a detailed analysis of the revisions,
and EPA's reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and will not be restated here.
II. Public Comments
EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for the February
11, 2021, proposed rule. The comment period ended on March 15, 2021.
EPA received a total of three comments, all from private citizens, on
the proposed approval of this rule. Two comments were in support of the
action and one comment was adverse. No further discussion of the
supporting comments is necessary. EPA summarizes and responds to the
adverse comment below.
Comment: This rule should be more restricting on the harmful gases
that are released into the atmosphere. The 19% of coke waste that is
pumped into our atmosphere 24 hours a day should be cut by at least 2%
for the year 2021. The option for retubing defeats the new revision
because it allows the company to continue to let a maximum of 14%
rather than the proposed 13%.
Response: The provision relating to 19% of the coke oven waste
gases leaving the common tunnel was not reopened by our proposal and is
not being revised by this rulemaking. As per the consent decree,
Indiana was not required to amend the facility's maximum percentage of
coke oven gases leaving the common tunnel that can be vented into the
atmosphere. Indiana has retained the original limit which was adopted
to be protective of the previous SO<INF>2</INF> standard. See 70 FR
56129. No one timely challenged that previous determination and it is
too late to raise an objection now. As such, this portion of the
comment is outside of the scope of this action.
In addition, the commentor raised a concern over the increase in
bypass venting allowed during a ``retubing year.'' This term is defined
in the proposed revision as a year in which there is a replacement of:
(1) Waterwalls, evaporator tubes, economizer tubes, or superheater
module pendants within the heat recovery steam generator; and (2)
exterior casing, insulation, and refractory, as needed. To comply with
the consent decree, IHCC and Cokenergy submitted to Indiana a request
to lower the facility's maximum bypass venting to 13%, down from
previously allowed 14%, except during a heat recovery steam generator
(HRSG) retubing year. During a retubing year, the facility is allowed
increase the bypass venting back up to the previously permissible
maximum of 14% when at least 3.25% of the bypass venting is due to the
HRSG retubing. In any year, one or more HRSGs may be brought offline to
replace parts that are prone to wear due to operating at extreme
temperatures. The need to increase bypass venting arises from the fact
that the facility is unable to construct redundant HRSGs that could
accept the waste gas stream when the primary HRSG is offline. As such,
when a HRSG is offline due to retubing, the facility will need to
divert a higher percentage of the gas stream to the atmosphere through
bypass venting. This provision allows the facility to preserve its
pollution control devices located downstream that cannot handle the
high temperature of the gas stream that does not first go through a
HRSG. EPA agrees with this technical justification for the need to
allow increase bypass venting during a retubing year to the previously
permissible 14%. Overall, this revision will lower the percentage of
coke oven gases that are vented to the atmosphere via bypass venting.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving Indiana's July 10, 2020 request to revise 326 IAC
7-4.1-7 and 326 IAC 7-4.1-8. These SO<INF>2</INF> SIP revisions
strengthen the SIP and fulfill the requirements of the Federal consent
decree with Cokenergy LLC and IHCC.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Indiana
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>, and at the EPA Region
5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
[[Page 30203]]
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
<bullet> Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 6, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: June 1, 2021.
Cheryl Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends title 40 CFR
part 52 as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.770, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for ``7-4.1-7'' and ``7-4.1-8'' under the heading ``Rule
4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject effective EPA approval date Notes
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
7-4.1-7..................... Cokenergy LLC sulfur 8/24/2020 6/7/2021, [INSERT ..............
dioxide emission Federal Register
limitations. CITATION].
7-4.1-8..................... Indiana Harbor Coke 8/24/2020 6/7/2021, [INSERT ..............
Company sulfur dioxide Federal Register
emission limitations. CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-11769 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 7, 2021.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.